The “to Germany” rule is obviously defeated when considering the Italian tree and the French tree, as I have stated prior. Otherweise it is an unfair selective application of the rule; which I do not support in any manner.
a canadian tree is stupid
Hungary is a subtree of Italy
Netherlands is a subtree of France
Canada is not a subtree of Britain
You’re the one asking to break the “rule” and get unfair special treatment.
4 Likes
As a German main, I believe that we don’t need more leopard clones in other nations.
Read again, it’s cuz Canada ISNT a SUBTREE the rule is that if it’s an export vehicle but there isnt a subtree it goes to the og fabricator Aka Germany since Canada ISNT a SUBTREE
1 Like
It’s the same reason why the Skink is in both the US and UK trees. Half the parts are US-made half are made in the UK.
Ex: License, engine, transmission, and other smaller stuff->US.
Guns->UK, but due to Canada being a commonwealth country->UK potentially some other parts as well.
1 Like
It’s the weird middle child from the victorian age family they keep Hidden in the basement
1 Like
That made me chuckle.
Canada should be a sub-tree.
I don’t agree with the Inconsistent and unfair treatment towards Canada.
2 Likes
There is no unfair or inconsistent treatment towards canada. Its handed normaly like every other nation without a home in the game
PLEASE stop with the copyslop, does every damn nation need a leo 2?
1 Like
You have my full support, I’d actually be able to play certain BRs. And Gaijin has shown their willingness to duplicate vehicles(tho it does take said major nation to cry until they get a vehicle they have nothing to do with… so…) with less relation than Canada has with the UK, that they can’t even give Candian stuff to other trees without it being covered in Canada’s connection to the UK.
Being ripped across TT is the WORST fate any nation could have and those defending that 99% likely hate those nations.
And indeed as of right now, the UK is the best place for Canada (and a CAN-ANZAC tree would be the next best place but we don’t have that)
4 Likes
I am not fighting thar, it is bad.
And i am all for a stand alone canada, australian new zealand tech tree.
But not for the UK. UK would simply get to much at this point with already 2 sub trees with a lot of diversity. Mbt choices from uk, sa and india.
And a giant amount of planes. It is just completly unfair to other game nations currently in the game.
Adding leopards and abrams into that equation is just bullshit sorry but UK does not deserve thar when it has overall the same possibilities as france and germany. They are all in the same class.
France now has 2 subtrees. But they arent huge players either compared to canada and australia.
And UK would stand at 4 subtrees at that point.
The current implementation of sub trees is generaly bad and could be easily fixed.
But as it stands UK is pampered enough for subtrees already
Id happily sacrifice the india tree for the canadians
2 Likes
Doesnt matter what u want or like.
The indian sub tree is there and gonna stay.
That wont change anymofe
I will still push for it to be reverted
2 Likes
Do I get to keep my T-90?
I mean people still have Tiger 105 and panther 2. just disable the research for ppl that don’t have it. India should be a BRICs subtree to china
1 Like
No