Playing Germany 6.7 is impossible

Me when german main complains that their tanks are “bad” or “overtiered”
a close up of a man wearing a suit and tie making a funny face .

Meanwhile me playing japan ww2 stuff. Because I like the game hard and suffer.

image

1 Like

then war thunder just needs to spam advertisements

How does advertising have to do with levels and BR?

make more players join the game or like say: ‘if u get at 4.7 in 1 week, we’ll give u 200k sl’ or smth

Ok but if i’m level 100 and you said I shouldn’t face level 18s how will I be able to play? The problem wasn’t a lack of new players it’s a lack of old players going back.

hmmm you have a point

1 Like


the amount of useless topics this guy pushes out

1 Like

bruh absolute crybaby bro does nothing else than complaining
bro probably has more hours on the wiki forums writing complains than actually playing the fucking game

Tiger II (both) should go down to 6.0, but their side are only allowed to field one at a time and the running gear will break down after driving a specified distance (100 meters?).

On a more serious note, 6.7 Germany is an absolutely incredible line up. Both King Tigers, Jagdtiger and Elefant, good SPAA, a solid scout tank and the me262 with the derpy cannon. Anyone struggling with that lineup probably needs some practice.

Lmao more stuff than a sad American main like myself lol

Skill issue, like, really…

some decomp around these brs would be nice

I believe he is complaining about the South African 6.7, with the Ratel 20, 90, and G6. Which honestly is my line up. I also use the Tempest as well for CAP/CAS, although I will complain that landing Tempests is extremely difficult because it loves to maintain speed when I don’t want it to.

1 Like

It is allways hilarious to see that the pz4h/j are a full br lower than the chi to and that the chi nu is the same br as the pz 4G

1 Like

“Playing Germany at 6.7” yeah no, that’s just bait.
“Nerf AMX” it’s like he listens to TikTok and parrots them
“When fix BR” fair enough
“Nerf AIM 120” agree and disagree. I just don’t like spam.
“F/A-18 ruins” yeah, wallet warriors do that
“Fix ground in arcade” no.
“Fair teams” it’s like this is his first multiplayer game
“Mi-4 at 7.7” fair enough, that Heli is bad.
“F/A-18 at 13.0” I mean, fair enough? C versions, yes.
“Fix notch” maybe do it properly?
“Reached top tier” that poor soul.
“F4 nerf” it already sucks, it doesn’t need to suck more.

1 Like

finally someone who knows

another one that knows!

1 Like

Tiger at 6.3 would dominate and utterly destroy in downtiers. If you want it to be 6.3, than the T34, T26E1, M26, IS-2, etc. etc. deserve to be at LEAST 6.3 as well, if not even lower.

The Tiger IIs are the perfect 6.7s- not too broken but not terrible vehicles either. All it takes is a little bit of skill, time, and patience to do well in these vehicles. Their are a million other things that should be moved down BEFORE the Tiger IIs ever do (an example; the IS-2) for a wide variety of reasons

first of all: ur logic is so funny XDDDDD

second: i have 13.7 soviet air and 7.7 soviet ground, so im a real russian main

third: the russian bias doesn’t exist, i just named myself “Russian Bias” cuz when i started with Germany 3.7/5.7, i heared about “russian bias” and how it makes the russian tanks stronger (something that isn’t true) so i started playing Russia and named myself Russian Bias

its fair, the sherman can pen the 100mm turret armor and the tiger… well, can pen everything, but it isn’t OP cuz it can’t outstand any shots and almost everyone knows the weaknesses of the king tigers, especially the P version