For your nam being russian bias you lack any of it and the Logic begind it
3 Likes
i can say the same to you
lol, nice logic: so cuz im named russian bias u think im bad and i don’t know nothing behind the logic
6.7 is pretty good, id say you’re just getting bad luck honestly. IS-4M is a pain but barrel shot with the Tigers reload will normally let you win but again depends on the circum stances. Id say take some time to learn your vehicles and learn what maps and areas best fit both your tanks style and your style of gameplay. 6.7 Germany is very forgiving, as for the HE lobbers, the Tiger 2P is more protected to HE rounds on the turret over the 2H.
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
thx for saying i have bad luck and not im a noob with skill issues!
1 Like
skill issue extreme, 6.7 German is very consistent and fun to play, besides that no tank is balanced based on the top tier it faces but rather if it is equivalent to those in the same tier, 6.7 for both tiger 2 is perfect, below that is idiotic, 7.0 would still be good, but not so much
I mean we have our faults i mess up shots all the time or do dumb stuff in OP vehicles. If im doing poorly i just call it for the day, i get amazing games some days and days where i get killed back to back. Such is the glorious game we play.
2 Likes
Don’t get too worked up, BR 6.7 can be daunting at first but like every other BR in the game you can overcome the challenge with a bit of patience and practise.
1 Like
Eh, depends on playstyle tbf, i prefer light tanks and love to flank and play very aggressive. The heavies and TD’s on Germany are good but they dont play well with my main playstyle, im sure if i stopped playing super super aggressive id do better but i dont and it leads to me getting surrounded without the mobility to get away.
Not everyone will play a vehicle the same way, i mean ive met people who are terrified to do close range infighting with the KV-220 instead they sit back and snipe.
Sometimes the snail bias is on yourside. (Yes i am a total peice of **** lol)
Keep that energy when you have 5.7 France and Britain fighting 6.7 Germany. Nothing like Solid Shot to ruin your day.
1 Like
First of all, you’re calling out “Russian bias” while complaining that German vehicles aren’t good enough for you — that’s a bit ironic. Second, you’re not even a Russian bias main yourself. Third, the entire reason the term “Russian bias” exists is because Soviet tanks like the BT-7M, T-34, and KV-1 were basically perfect for in-game purposes. Historically, they were pioneers in terms of performance for their time.
And yes, there were things like poor crew ergonomics — but don’t even try to bring up the welding criticism. The U.S. trials noted the welds were rough, but the important structural parts were reinforced and done well. If you’ve ever seen footage from inside a KV-1, you’d understand.
Soviet tanks from around 1939 to 1960 were simply better. Did you know that, by the logic used to balance the Maus, the first IS-7 prototype should be at the same BR? That IS-7 was built just a week after WWII ended. NATO tanks only caught up to the USSR’s quality much later. The IS series had a clear edge compared to German or NATO tanks of the time.
I don’t even want to go down the rabbit hole of Soviet equipment production — because, oh boy, it gets political real fast. Political enough that this might get deleted. The term “Russian bias” is a byproduct of internet culture, history, and yes, some good old Soviet propaganda. And speaking of that — did you know Gaijin
Gaijin made this sh!t up just to nerf the USSR tech tree artificially? Fly high, 152mm anti-concrete shell — you were too real for this fake-ass balance. Meanwhile, Germany in-game is privileged to have a museum of made-up tanks that got added purely to please the weaboo fanbase with their “aesthetic” armor layouts and anime-tier power fantasies
7 Likes
in this case, it’s not the tank itself, but the player, in the case of the post, it’s being stated that tiger 2 is bad and needs to be changed.
get on the bulldog and Jagdpanzer dude.
6.7 Germany is a fantastic lineup. Bkan is just annoying, its glass. IS-4M to a Tiger II (H) is the same as a Tiger II (H) is to a 76 Sherman. And Tiger II (P) to 6.3? Absofuckinlutely not.
1 Like
Yeah, not blaming, was playing the AMX M4, one full downtier out of five or six matchss., the battle rating 8.7 has began having less players than it used to have,
Now battle rating 9.0 to battle rating 9.3 is doing a party with constant downtiers, which battle rating gets an advantage of not facing full stabilized vehicles every time and for obvious reasons battle rating 6.7 vehicles suffers from this.
The battle rating changes scaries peoples, specially peoples that plays Meta and has an specific line-up made of excentially better vehicles than its other counterparts.
Says a brit that fights 6.7 Germans with full line up of vehicles/planes from mid to late 1950’s
You do know that that thig hasn’t been working for 5 + years now
huh?
