I think they also factor in the actual statistics of player performance in arcade. I feel like the change would be reverted if it pushed more people away from naval than it pulled in
I certainly enjoy playing arcade naval as it brought my father into playing it.
i see no point in lowering some ships tier from VI to V (like uss texas) to make even harder to unlock tier VII. whit those changes you need to research all tier VI ships to unlocok tier VII, and i find this an unless encreise in grind time. plase recosider those tiers moving o to lower the number of ships needed to unloack tier VII to max ships in rank VI minus 1, (for example if there are 5 ships in rank VI you need only 4 to unloack tier VII)
We needed more decompression especially at cruser level, light crusers and destroyers don’t have a place to fighting vs battelships with relatively fast relods and good armor.
And not moveing the havy German cruises up is baffling. Move eugen and hipper up to 6.3 without any problems.
the turtleback alone makes scharn the best ship for the BR. the only way to kill it right now is to set a fire to a turret and pray it spreads to and detonates the magazine before being put out. it would do just fine at 7.7. only reason it could stay at 7.3 is if they made bigger maps where the turtleback becomes useless due to shells being able to plunge into the deck properly.
@Smin1080p_WT Hi, I noticed the italian ship Eugenio di Savoia is going down to 5.3, But her premium sister in the russian tree, Kerch will remain in 5.7 despite not having differences in firepower and protection, is this correct?
Reasoning: I don’t know the reasoning behind the Mariya’s rate of fire buff, but keeping her at where she was is insanity. She is already good at the compressed BR where she doesn’t get to fight cruisers often and with ~40 second reload. So buffing her rof to be around the same as Von Der Taan will inevitably make her far too strong. So I suggest she should be moved up to avoid having her farming cruisers.