Well in real life there was a proposal to mount the 105 mm in the Tiger II. It just never went anywhere past paper because the Germans realized how impossibly difficult it would be to fit such a cannon in the turret while also having two loaders for the 2 stage ammunition.
Lmao
It’s the American Maus but it’s completely different from the Maus.
Yes. That’s the issue. APCR is trash.
Some light tanks and TDs in the br range of 6.3 - 6.7 have access to HEAT-FS and APDS. Jpz 4-5, LeKPz M41, T92, M50, SU-122-54, ASU-85, AML-90, M46, and many more. These tanks have access to more advanced ammunition yet they are facing WW2 tanks and are not being considered for a br adjustment. Why?
Ground vehicles from 10.0 onwards should move up in br as well. Vehicles in the range of 8.3-9.3 br are being compressed further into top tier and this exacerbates the issue you guys are trying to tackle. Vehicles without thermal vision and laser rangefinder are being compressed into facing those who have.
Some changes are odd. ATGM carriers are not going up in br. Some MBTs like T-64s are not being raised in br as well. I feel like these changes are not consistent enough across the board and this will lead to further imbalances with specific vehicles.
Im against MANPAD SAMs such as the Type 93 and Ozelot going up, they can’t compete against strike drones and helicopters with long range ATGMs.
thats not how it works…
That’s why i’m raising the issue. Nothing will happen if we dont get this to Gaijin’s attention
Agreed.
nope the t-series have way better armor, better round and not forget the 50cal (that alone is an uptier reason)
TURMS and 2s38 are ok at 10.0. Why? because skill issue. 2s38 performs the same at 10.0 as well as at higher br. TURMS is just premium t-72b(9.7) at 10.0 BR.
you are kidding lul
6.7 becomes more than playable because of these changes, so GG.
t-54 at 8.0 RIP
PLS leave HMS-Glorious at 5.7, she is good but she only has 4 main guns with low rate of firing, she is not any more powerful than those fast-firing 203mm CA or those rapid-firing 155 CL.
Also, i hope the past plan on techtree about “moving CM25 in front of PTL02, moving Ratal20 in front of Eland90 Mk7, and moving Eland90 MK7 in front of G6” to be continued and deployed, cause it is a right movement considering their BR and capability.
Thanks for listening, let’s make the game better.
Leo will go down to 7.7 in no time. dont worry
can somebody explain to me why the Ozelot gets moved to 9.7 and the Type 93 to 9.3 but the Strela stays at 9.0?!?!
This is a straight up joke, the Strela being at the same BR as the Type 93 before was wrong in the first place, as being 0.3 higher then the Ozelot, but now its just getting more ridiculous.
I play the AMX-30’s and they arent that good to go up
Re.2005 shouldnt be 6.0
It really doesnt matter tbh
The T29/30/34 have better turret armor but worse hull armor. Their armor is not overall better.
Everything is for RB
ZLT11 should either remain at 9.3 or go to 10.0 and receive a modern reload of 12 shots per minute (5s reload aced). At the new 9.7 its not going to have a lineup it will just be dead content plus the vehicle isn’t much better than the PTL02.
M60A3TTS (China). If its going to be moved then give it M774 or DM63 both are historically appropriate options.
QN506, 9.7 - 9.3. Awful vehicle in almost every way.
Magach 6M 8.7 - 9.0. If the inferior shot’kal dalet deserves a BR raise then the superior Magach should go up too. If the 6M and Dalet both go up to 9.0 they will share a BR with Magachs that have M426 and hence should both get M426.
With all the 8.3 going to up to 8.7 the ZTZ88s need to go up to 9.0 and be buffed accordingly. My idea is to buff the reload rate to 6.7 seconds aced like other L7 tanks since the vehicles have more modern 105mm guns rather than D10 based conversions and also give em a better shell.