Planned Battle Rating Changes (October 2026) — Aircraft and Ground Vehicle Decompression

no its not

How is that not normal? Let me see if I’ve got this right, all anti-air go up in BR, and you thing the planes should face weaker anti-air , even though the vast majority of them are already under-tier.

1 Like

You have completely ruined reasonably balanced CAS in Ground RB and destroyed lineups across multiple nations. Why did you raise the BR of every aircraft carrying Mavericks so high?
The AJS37 at 11.7 is an absolute joke. What is this aircraft supposed to do without guns or countermeasures against AIM-9Xs, Pantsirs, FK-2000s, and similar threats?
This is just ridiculous and feels like a completely arbitrary BR increase. The F-4E, a 1960s aircraft, has been moved up to 12.0. It will be practically unplayable there, just like all the other early Maverick carriers.
Revert the BR changes for these aircraft and stop ruining CAS gameplay!

1 Like

imagem

1 Like

Vehicle: TKX(P)
Gamemode: ground realistic/ ground sim
BR Change: 12.0 → 12.3 → 12.0
Reason:

  • 4 seconds reload isn’t as good as before with overall 5-5.5s reload of almost all topteir tanks.

  • Shooting DM-33 against Relikt Armor since the buff isn’t effective at even little angle. For a hit to have a penetration, it needs to be way to close to a perfect 90°. This added with the LFP buff on some toptier Abrams, you can’t not penetrate ‘correctly’ any tanks over a given distance since very precise shots are needed.

  • Mobility is better only is straight lines, but bleeds speed so much while turning because of the transmission model, making it less mobile than other MBT’s.

  • Armor / survivability wise, is as armored as a HSTV-L. 3 crew member, 2 in the terret way too close, no armor makes it easily destroyed or disabled with the big turret ring hinding behind a 35mm wall that can be 20mm HVAP or 12,5mm trough the turret ring.

Spoiler

image

1 Like

You do realise that’s just the panels, don’t you? You’ve still got the internal armour. Comparing a TKX to an HTVL is insane

You’re always going to fire the second shot first, wtf

Wanting the TKX to have the same BR as the Type 90 is surreal. Copium in this topic is incredible

2 Likes

Holy dishonest comparison batman.

2 Likes

no one’s forcing you to hold W in a full uptier instead of holding an angle and lolpenning the xm803 when it appears

The F-15GE was by far the best 14.3 and needed to go up to the top br after the buffs it got

F-15GE underperforming is a crazy statement
firefox_StDMgaDkiR

4 Likes

Vehicle: BMPT all version
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 —> 12.0 —> 12.7
Reason: This combat unit needs to be moved to a higher Battle Rating (BR). It’s telling that the BMPT can dismantle even 11.7 BR tanks—hitting them head-on with its APFSDS belt—and it’s frequently chosen as a second spawn in top-tier matches. The vehicle doesn’t require any further modifications or the addition of new types of fin-stabilized projectiles. It can be destroyed just as easily as most other top-tier tanks, so its survivability is perfectly fine. It has already caused enough grief for players at lower Battle Ratings. As someone who owns both versions of the BMPT, I believe that 12.7 is exactly where they belong.

no tank has recieved a reload speed buff since the tkx p got moved to 12.3, wdym 4 second reload isnt as good as before when nothing has changed? it should still go lower in br for sure

The T-80UD shouldn’t be at the same battle rating as the Leopard 2A4, because the Leopard is a superior vehicle. It belongs at 10.7; after all, its top speed is only 60 km/h. So, that opinion isn’t objective—while other tanks are already taking up their positions, you’re still on your way from the spawn.

1 Like

is the mig-29M going to get the extra countermasures since it will face 15.0 now?

More Copium , men mig-29m need get extra countremauser since it will face 13.0 ?

it has 60 countermasures fighting top tier, their not even large countermasures:0

What are you smoking budy the soviet 10.7 line up is at least 2 seconds slower and worse than any 2a4 or M1 abrams line up the T-80UD and 2s38 are always outmanuvered and out positioned I have that line up its win rates vary from 35% to 45% and its kd ratio is around 1. Tanks with no mobility no turret traverse poor spaw damage should not be going up in br. Br3 arena tank has a 800hp engine. I have several nations already purchased and I can tell you for certain the leo2a4s and M1s eat it for breakfast.

and ??? , 10 Flares , 50 Chaffs is enough

Vehicle: SU-25SM3
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.7 —> 13.0 —> 12.0-12.3 Without the Kh-38
Reason: As you are all aware, this aircraft is effectively saddled with a test-bed missile—a weapon that has never seen actual operational use. It would be better to remove this missile from its loadout and lower the aircraft’s Battle Rating (BR). This would prevent it from having to face top-tier anti-aircraft missile systems (SAMs) and high-end combat aircraft, against which it stands no chance. The aircraft is very sluggish in maneuvers, making it extremely difficult for it to evade incoming missiles. Removing the Kh-38 would resolve the very issue that has made the aircraft so unviable.

it hardly is enough