Use your brain for a sec. F15c at the same br has more missile and better flight performance.
So stop acting like brain dead baised person and grow up
1 Like
Air AB, Yak-38 (the standard one and the M variant) 9.3 → 9.7 : insanely good missiles for its BR (R60s!).
1 Like
Air AB, Ki-84 hei 7.7 > 7.0. : 7.7 is way too high for a prop plane with poor top speed.
Air AB All the Ki-49s 3.3 > 3.0 & 3.7 > 3.3 : poorly armored bombers with small bomb loads and average speed compare to other nations at the same BRs.
Vehicles: Namers.
Gamemode: All.
Br change 10.7 or 11.0.
Reason: slow, armor is mid but the weapons are a huge let down. A bush master at this br with only spikes on the side is crazy. A bush master is already terrible let alone on a slow vehicle so these need a buff.
1 Like
Ground AB, E.B.R. (1951) 4.7 > 4.3 : useless gun at its BR and no line-up to bring with it.
Ground AB & RB, MEPHISTO 8.7 > 9.0 with the addition of HOT-3 missiles it historically carried : really similar to the chinese AFT-09 which is literally a copy of it. Moving it also at 9.0 allows it to be a good support for the 9.3 lineup. There are already 5 ground vehicles at 8.7 at the moment (even more with the MARS 15 and AMX-10RC going up !) and none at 9.0 in the french tree.
2 Likes
Agreed, buffing French vehicles is always welcome.
1 Like
I quite honestly think the A-5c shouldn’t go up to 11.0 it will have to face f-4s and mig-23s which it cant compete with with 18 countermeasures and only rear aspect magic 1s
Vehicles: Challenger 3
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
Br change 12.3 keep at 12.0
Reason: Its not very good really is it? leopard 2a7v gun on a nude challenger 2 hull. the worse reload offsets the benefit of the 120 smoothbore over the rifle on a challenger 2.
5 Likes
If russian bias isnt their vehicles eating shells its definitely how under br’d their vehicles constantly are.
1 Like
Then you have been either gotten shot by one you saw only 1 second before impact, or HAVE only shot it at afterburning F14s from 500 meters away. When they got introduced on the SU25 testbed, they were really strong. Then it got NATO-Thundere’d quickly after western mains complained. The current state is the irccm being largely ineffective, especially compared to missiles of the competition.
Whoever wants to replace long range ERs with shorter range missiles can’t have all their senses together.
This isn’t 11.0, the meta is radar missiles. Right now, we have 2 very good ERs vs. 4 or more buffed Sparrows which is acceptable (quality vs quantity). You want to downgrade that even further and force 29s into dogfights in the radar missile era. And not only do you exchange good radar missiles with r73s, but you also want to downgrade its radar missiles directly, too.
The 29 is done for once it has shot off its radar missiles, it can only rely on its ERs. What you want to do is like saying “okay, I will take 50 bucks out of your pocket, but in exchange you’ll get 20 back”.
Only a fool would propose fighting 13.0s and 13.3/7s with R73s in exchange for ERs.
Have you taken a look at the 29’s stats in the game? Do you think that will improve by taking its biggest asset away in exchange for R73s? Do you realize which missiles at these high tiers score the absolute majority of kills? Yes, radar missiles.
Jaguar A and Super Etendard : move the magic missile modification from tier IV to tier I.
These aircrafts can’t survive without them at their BR.
2 Likes
Soukou-Tei No.4 Tier II > Tier I : a 1.3 BR boat should not be tier II, and it’s an especially weak one. Moreover, the Type 5 at BR 1.7 is Tier I.
3 Likes
jumbe 75 definitely should not be 5.0 but the 76 is also way over br’d.
Logical tech-tree adjustements for France:
Switch places between the F-100D and the Alpha Jet E in the french tech tree, respectively a fighter in the attacker line and an attacker in the fighter line… Moreover it seems logical to me for the super saber to be after an other sabre and before the F-8 which is literally based on the F-100.
The french (dutch) sea fury needs to be moved in the benelux line of the tech tree.
Yeah…ok …15.0…why not 16.0 to actually fix some problems other than reshuffle the deck…
1 Like
dude the A1A1 lacks the DM33 the 1A5 has, has no thermals, and has no laser rangefinder .
it really makes sense for it to be at an lower BR compared to the 1A5 lol
1 Like
i agree the leo 1a5 should be higher than the A1A1. the a1a1 is just a 9.3 tank. a better dart is negligible at such a BR and thermals is hardly worth BR increases.
1a5 i think should be a 9.7 as a minute upgrade to a1a1 as its real world improvements hardly affect gameplay
With the Alpha Jet TH going up in BR (AB), this plane should be placed at rank VII and switch places with the F-5A, which already have a lower BR (AB) and only 2 AIM-9Es !
The F-5A will feel way more at home at Rank VI. I can’t understand how a plane with all-aspect missiles can be placed in front of one with such poor ones.