Vehicle: Falcon
Br RB: 8.3>8.3
Reason: it is sub par compared to the other radar spaa going up and i dont think britain needs 3 8.7 spaa. It would also retain an spaa at 8.3 without having to add another. Maybe giving it the siddam treatment and removing its aphe belt would also help keep it at 8.3.
disagree with you mate, the laser rangefinder there already proves to be an very significative upgrade, and while the thermals arent at a very good resolution since they are gen 1, its something that helps alot on multiple situations, and the dm33 while not changing much in pratice to the dm23 its still an upgrade to account for.
Now looking to the other 9.3 tanks it feels decently ballanced, and imo some of them should go down not the A1A1 going up. An example would be the T72, could be an 9.0 material, it has some tradeoffs but still has laser rangefinder, same goes for the KPZ/MBT70 that has some significant downsides that could fit on a 9.0 game easily imo
Why F-2A is moving to 14.0? that thing should stay in 13.7, it has no HMS and MiG-29KR should stay at 13.7 too, its limitation to not be able to use its afterburner under 5km altittude is a huge disadvantage (because the engine and oil heats so fast).
F-16A ADF will be same BR as the F-16CM bloq 50?
F-16A ADF should stay at 13.3 as the F-16XL
F-15C GE should be 14.7 not 15.0
F-15A/J/Baz should return to 13.0
F/A-18C Early should also go to 13.0
F/A-18A should go to 12.7
Please consider this changes
Are you actually saying the t72 is a good 9.0 or have i not seen AB somewhere or something? Same with the kpz/mbt70.
Because gaijin has always based br’s on the player base and not the vehicle itself, its why things like the cv90105 sat at 10.3 while the vt5 sat at 11.7, the cv90 is probably better because no armor best armor and its round has consistant post pen damage. They are almost identical otherwise except the vt5 has spal liners and a .50 cal.
Like what are they even thinking? Stronger engine, more CM’s, HMD… The reason why ADF has such a high K/D is the meta that is defined by the matchmaker.
Technically its decompression so i think both should go up relative to everyone else which seems to be 14.0.
because its vastly stronger than those that will be 12.7 and violently better than 12.3s
honestly most 13.0s dont fare much chance either
Oh… I thought they were moving ALL top tier jets up, this doesnt look good.
it has no HMS at almost the top of the top tier, it is a feature that I strongly believe limits its true capability. keeping it at 13.7 will cause no breaking points
Bruh, then the same
MB346 getting moved to 13.0 in ground because of brimstones LMAO. They REALLY dont like us being able to effectively take out helis do they as good luck killing anything else with them.
AESA radar with a fantastic RWR does that, im fine with it being moved but they really should move up the rest of the 13.7s along with it.
I use them. As long as I’m within 1km when I fire and the missile isnt looking 90 degrees off bore when its fired they usually hit
Consider that people don’t want things necessarily only for meta reasons
Ground Realistic:
A-4E Skyhawk. 9.3 to 10.0 is to much! It will face 11.00 SPAAs and planes. All that because you can bring 2 walleyes bombs? Please, make it 9.7 to keep it playable.
2s6 is getting moved up so the worst youll see is exactly the same as what you see now.
Yeah but these two tanks aren’t almost identical. There is zero difference between them other than the name.
Vehicle: Mirage 5BA (France)
Game mode: Air Realistic Battles
Battle Rating 10.3->10.0
“Jack of all trades, master of none”
is a phrase that perfectly describes this vehicle. When compared to the Mirage IIIC (10.0) it is weaker at Air Combat, with worse missile armament and worse maneuverability. When compared to the Mirage 5F (10.0) it is worse at Ground Attack and Base Bombing due to the fact the Mirage 5BA (10.3) lack any Ballistic Computer, making strikes far more difficult. Even with Counter Measures, the Mirage 5BA struggles at Jobs that other Mirages do better at a lower Battle Rating. Lowering the Mirage 5BA to 10.0 would help the vehicle do slightly better, but still have trade-offs compared to the other 10.0 Mirages.
Vehicle:Z-19 / Z-19E
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change:11.7 → 12.0 (Planned: 12.3)
Reason: The proposed increase to 12.3 is unjustified given its ground-attack capabilities. The AKD-9 (BA-9) is merely a sub-tier laser-guided ATGM that falls significantly short of AGM-114 Hellfire-tier performance in terms of range, velocity, and post-penetration damage. Sitting at the exact same Battle Rating as the Z-10—which carries far superior AKD-10 ATGMs—makes little sense. Even if this proposed bump is a punitive adjustment targeting its 16x TY-90 air-to-air loadout, forcing it to 12.3 without competitive anti-tank ordnance severely limits its utility in Ground RB, rendering its battle impact largely negative against top-tier SPAA and MBTs. A compromise at 12.0 is far more reasonable unless advanced ground-strike weaponry is introduced.
27SM has two more missiles and doesn’t fly like a POS.
Huh?
Su-27SM has one of the best flight models in the game (top 10) while Su-30MKK and MKK aren’t even relevant
Have you even TOUCHED a single flanker?
