Yak-3U needs to go to 6.3
It is one of the best props in the game and is in the same echelon as the P-51H and Spitfire Mk 24. It is very undertiered.
5 Likes
I dint know who though of that but i am speechless
apparently the SU-25 will stay at 9.7 but the A-7H a similar aircraft (if not worse) but they moving the A-7H at 11.3, same br as the A-7E and SU-25BM, whoever thought that A-7H should be 11.3 and SU-25 9.7 pls come throw
9 Likes
Hey is there anyone seen Object 279？
US main moment.
3 Likes
MO-4: 1.0 —> 1.7
Reason: has a decently sized crew, 2 45 mm guns, 2 12,7’s and it also gets an additional rocket launcher. This vehicle is incredibly broken and has no place at 1.0
in most cases you can literally multipath right up to the F-4S
It’s not that big of a task
that is not my experience with the r73
1 Like
Newport News, which is basically the same vessel
Pls don’t destroy my 10.7 Brits lineup, putting both hawk 200 to 11.3 in Ground is way to harsh 🙏
I really don’t wanna fight Pansirs and sh*t like that in my Subsonic
3 Likes
Vehicle: AGS
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.3
Reason: It has 1st gen of thermovision and APFSDS from 9.0 BR so it doesn’t belong to this environment. Give it M900 and let it on this BR. Somehow BMPTs will be at 12.0.
2 Likes
Arguably, even if the Premium Flankers went up to 14.0 and faced 15.0 uptiers. They’d perform fine.
To clarify: the su30’s and su27sm are basically the same plane. The only difference between them being that the su27 has +30m/s more acceleration.
I don’t know what Gaijin was smoking planning these changes but I am sure other players agree too, that the insignificant engine power difference makes no right for them to think that su30 is any worse than su27sm.
These two planes should be the same br.
I get that they somehow have to milk money out of players, but this is outrageous, for how many years has this been going on?
2 Likes
they should be 14.0
there is literally no reason at this point for them to not. they clap everything at their BRs, and at 13.7 will continue to clap.
Screw this russian/chinese bs, I want some balanced air battles!
bu… bu… but walleye strong? yeah good luck getting close with a 2s6 on the enemy team, let alone have anything hit as they shoot all of your munitions out of the sky…
2 Likes
fr, f15 cannot compete with typhoons, su-30s, and rafales.
It needed to be 1 BR below them for a reason
Vehicle: IAR-93B
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.3 → 9.0
Reason: It doesn’t have any flares or guided bombs/rockets and somehow SU-25K is only 0.4 BR higher with flares and more and better armament.
3 Likes
“WAAAAAH MUH OP Fox3 SLINGER CAN’T SLAP EVERYTHING NO MORE :((((”
3 Likes
Air AB, American, Italian and French F-84F 9.0 > 8.7 : same BR as the israeli and german ones which are identical. Terrible flight performance for a 9.0 aircraft. This inconsistency is in the game since these vehicles were added!
On the plus side, the F-100s had the same issue between different nation since years, and it is finally fixed !
1 Like
Air AB, Mystere IVA 9.0 > 8.7 (France and Israel) : it has no IR missiles, no afterburner and worst aerodynamics compare to the Super Mystere B2 which is also 9.0. The 30mm canons are good but 8.0 F-86s have better flight performance and its energy retention is terrible. The comparison is even worse with a 8.3 Javelin or Scimitar which have better firepower AND flight caracteristics !
1 Like
Air AB, Mystere IIC 8.7 > 8.3 : same issues than its big brother but with even worst flight performances, especially acceleration.
1 Like
Was talking about the j-15 kido
Air AB, Vautour IIB and Vautour IIA 9.7 → 9.3 (France and Israel) : abyssmal flight performance at for this BR, you can’t avoid the fighters you face going mach 1, and dodging a missile is physically not possible in this plane.
1 Like