2s6 being 1.7 for years despite being as good as an adats in taking out air targets was insane and they still complain about the “nerf”.
Honestly, this was the worst change to battle ratings in the entire history of the game—it’s a real shame. After 8 years of continuous play, I’m actually considering quitting. The developer has absolutely no idea what they’re doing.
Biggest cope i had ever heard, they just wanted an excuse to add the smsv.
USS IOWA
Naval RB
8.7->9.0
basically unbeatble in any 7.7 ship the armor is too thick and it out guns every 7.7 heavily while being faster too there is not a single thing someone can do
USS IOWA
Naval AB
8.7->9.0
basically unbeatble in any 7.7 ship the armor is too thick and it out guns every 7.7 heavily while being faster too there is not a single thing someone can do
Yea. because player stats dictate literally everything to do with balances and the addition of SM SV.
its why spitfire 24 is going to 7.0 in GRB, why A1A1 is 8.7 now despite being worthy of 9.3 where the 1a5 sits.
Bad players are the reason why a lot of vehicles are a mess, they wreck gaijins half arsed attempts at balance
Vehicle: Otomatic
Br RB: 11.3>11.3 or 11.0
Reason: Its only use is taking out helis and munitions and its pretty bad at both due to its radar not having any nctr at all meaning your sat there guessing if your looking at a jet, heli or munition coming in. It is by no means 11.7 worthy in the slightest and should not be moved up with the rest of its non existent lineup.
J15 at 15.0? really?? Again no counter mesures
SOVESTKY SOYUZ
8.7->9.0
NAVAL RB
currently strongest single ship ingame good armor best guns in game insane damage nothing can really beat in a 1v1 not something that should fight 7.7 ships
SOVESTKY SOYUZ
8.7->9.0
NAVAL AB
currently strongest single ship ingame good armor best guns in game insane damage nothing can really beat in a 1v1 not something that should fight 7.7 ships
Possibly getting ECM and/or new missiles.
Mirage 2000D-R1 moving to 12.3, facing SMSV, IRIS-T and SAMP/T in uptiers with 2 GBU, 2 NORDS and/or miserable ARMATs going at 415 m/s max which cant kill Gepards. Without guns. To fly it you will only have the EBRC or the MSC (11.3) against top tier tanks. Otherwise you will have to bring the Leclercs at 13.0. Why would you play the D-R1 at this point ? 12.3 is far too excessive…
If you wanted to kill an airplane, you couldn’t go about it any other way.
![]()
48 large calibre, which might as well 120 standard calibre.
@Stona_WT Thank you for taking the flight simulation mode into account right from the very first version of the spreadsheet. I had been quite critical of it, but I commend you for getting it right. Thank you for listening to us.
Here are a few suggestions I’ve been thinking about for a long time>
Aircraft: Buccaneer S.1
Game Mode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 9.0 —> 8.3
Reason: The aircraft does not meet the standards of its current tier. Compared to the new bombers added recently—which have defenses and weapons that deal more damage, such as the B-52H—or jet fighters with higher speeds and missiles, the Buccaneer S.1 needs a new classification.
Aircraft: Early MiG-29s (9-12A and B / Sniper /
Game Mode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 12.3 —> 12.7
Reason: I think it’s a mistake to upgrade the first F-16s (Netz and AJ) without upgrading the initial MiG-29s. The air-to-air balance will be destroyed. All the F-16s that are going to be upgraded will get radar-guided missiles or at least 2x AIM-9Ms… I don’t think so.
Aircraft: SU-11
Game Mode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 7.0 —> 7.3
Reason: Gaijin, I know this is going to hurt, but it’s about time you fixed this. No other 7.0 jet can keep up with this monster. And that’s why so many players don’t want to engage in battles in this tier—we all know it’s unbalanced. (Sorry, but I had to say it.)
Aircraft: A2D-1
Game Mode: Air Simulator
BR Change: 7.0 —> 6.3
Reason: We’ve already received jets in 6.3 (the L-39ZA and the MB-326B) that are capable of overwhelming this aircraft, so why is the A2D-1 still at 7.0?
ATTENTION / TYPING ERROR
Aircraft: Mirage 2000C-S4
Game Mode: Air Simulator
BR Change: ??? ??? ???
Reason: It is unclear what the adjustment to the rating range was, considering that the aircraft is currently rated at 12.3 and not as changing from 12.7 to 12.3.
Here I’ll follow the same line of reasoning as before: in the simulator, this aircraft isn’t all that great, so I’d think that reversing the values would mean moving from the 12.3 range to 12.7. And the initial MiG-29s would remain at 12.3. I’d like a more convincing and technical explanation if that’s the reasoning.
I really want to believe that the typo was from 12.3 to 12.0 and that FRANCE won’t lose a fighter in the 11.7 to 12.3 range just to make the initial MiG-29s look better. There’s no way to defend you here, Gaijin.
I think it’s time for all reasonable players—those who disagree with the decisions the developers have been making lately—to stage a revolt against Gaijin. Honestly, I have no desire left to even log into this game; it’s being deliberately ruined to cater to “e-athletes” who only bring one vehicle into battle—only to then get wiped out by aircraft. Take the “Terminator,” for instance—it’s still being played at a 13.0 Battle Rating, yet USSR players claim it’s “weak” and “nerfed.” And there are plenty of other tanks and anti-aircraft vehicles that deserve a much higher Battle Rating.
this isnt 2022 levels of problems. resounding no.
they know they need to decompress but are just going too slow for it to matter with powercreep from new additions
J22M1/ IAR-93B
ARB 9.0 - 8.7
Really poor high-speed performance, and its gun RPM is too fast
Assuming that the battle rating changes for the helicopters also applies to ground battles. The G-Lynx should be at 11.0 not 11.3, so the British 11.0 lineup maintains a helicopter without having to uptier the whole lineup. Especially since the now 11.0 russian ground lineup keeps the MI-35M at 11.0.
(ARB)
MiG-25PD
11.0 → 11.3 (11.7?)
10.0-10.3 jets lives matter
Air rb
Kfir canard 11.0 → 11.0 or 10.7
Kfir canard is already underwhelming at 11.0 with 36 cms and 2 aim 9g, how does it deserve to go up even more?