The same could be said for seeker suspension missiles like the AIM-9M and AAM-3. And the 9M and R73 were actually that way when they were first added, but people complained about it a bunch so Gaijin gave both an artificial nerf to their flare resistance.
Well, not really
Since strela often uses optical lock instead of IR.
They aren’t. All fox 3 missiles in game aside from the Mica and AIM-54 (and some SAM missiles I think as well) share the same seeker. Both the R77 and AIM-120 have the same notching resistance.
Their radars are roughly equal, and the MiG-35 has a better rwr because it has no blind spots, and it also gets 360 degree MAWS as well.
When notching in WT is so easy a literal braindead monkey could do it, close range performance matters significantly more than long range performance. And the R77 blows the AMRAAM out of the water in that category.
Understatement of the century
That is where most kills at top tier happen because notching long range shots is stupidly easy
2 Likes
The issue is that fov gating is apparently completely non-functional
It’s not clamping down on the aircraft at all
Vehicle: T-62/T-62M-1
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.7/9.0 —> 9.0/9.3
Reason: Considering the BR increase for other tanks, these tanks should also go up, as they’re in no way inferior to their current opponents. I suspect the developer simply “forgot” about these Soviet tanks.
Vehicle: T-55AMD/T-55AM-1
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.0 —> 9.3
Reason: Considering the BR increase for other tanks, these tanks should also go up, as they’re in no way inferior to their current opponents. I suspect the developer simply “forgot” about these Soviet tanks.
5 Likes
A friend of mine who uses the MiG-35 a ton told me it had 360 degree RWR, and I didn’t really have any reason to not trust him. I corrected my post
1 Like
He’s lying to you
I wouldn’t trust him anymore if that’s what he’s telling you ngl.
Especially since you can easily check this on statshark like I did
That seems a little bit much to me, considering its just one thing. Maybe he was also told that by someone else like I was. Or its possible he was talking about a different plane but I misremembered it as him talking about the Mig-35
tbf, I’m a bit more specific with who I trust to have good info on vehicles in-game than most.
Non-AESA Euro is better than the F-15E. In my experience, the only real threat to the Non-AESA EF2000 is other 14.7s, especially the AESA Eurofighters, which is also why I think the AESA Euro was a flawed addition
F-15C GE says hello
Never been difficult for me to deal with
That doesn’t make it a worse plane
I could say that about rafales with me in a MiG-35
But is that really how the matchup works out? God no
Base eurofighters should never of gotten the AIM-120C-5 imo. Theyll be fine with the B and it also gives the streagle of bit of an upper hand
There’s really no significant difference between the two, why does it matter
So we’re decompressing some br but making others compressed again. Current 9.3 lineup is going back to having to fight t80ud and 2s38.
1 Like
Neither should the F-15E have gotten them. They should have been kept C-5s to the Hornets to keep those at least somewhat relevant.
Massive skill issue; the first PT is one of the worst tanks I’ve ever played. Even when aiming for the ammo rack on the side of a Tiger, it took three shots just to turn the ammo red and blow it up.
1 Like