Ground RB
AMX-13 (FL11) : 4.3 > 4.0
5 Likes
Yep, its good the soviets won the battle of the atlantic, sunk Bismark, protected those north atlantic convoys coming from the soviets to support Britain…
wait… hang on a second
Oh the M8 Thunderbolt. Never heard it called the AGS 120 ever TBH
ItO 90M 12.0 → 11.7
its the same BR as the Pantsir-S1 still, less range, less missles, way worse radar, no guns
i think all that should be plenty of reasons to move the ItO 90M down
4 Likes
Ground RB.
RBT-5
1.3 → 2.7, Maybe 3.0.
This has everything the normal BT-5 has, Which is already one of if not the best reserve tier tanks, But it gets 2x 250kg rockets, These have a large enough blast radius to kill open vehicles over an entire objective, Can be fired across the map and indirectly nail people leaving spawn, And reload somewhat fast on objectives, These rockets can kill any tank in the game on hit and anything light on a near miss.
While the rockets have a dead-zone where you cant aim down, You can get around this by backing into walls to tilt the tank down which lets you fire them level.
To give an idea of just how powerful the rockets are, I exclusively use it as 5.7+, Mostly at 6.3 and have over a 1.8 KD in it along with a few nukes.
^ The RBT at only 3% of its power ^
^ The RBT at 10% power ^
Now imagine that at its current BR of 1.3 and what it could do there.
On maps with a linear objective layout its super broken, You can just sit on the objective on your teams side and endlessly bombard the enemy spawn making it impossible for light vehicles/AA’s to leave without dying.
As much fun it is to farm god modes off of 6.7’s its way too strong to be allowed to nuke reserve tier tanks.
If any tank was blessed with Russian bias, Its this one.
2 Likes
Ground RB:
CA Lorraine 6.0 > 5.7
4 Likes
Why not move the Pantsir up?
Because IT0 vs ADATS is just as bad
ADATS can actually kill tanks
also the adats has a gun
and i know better than to suggest up-br’ing russian tanks
Ground RB:
Mephisto: 8.7 > 9.0 and add HOT-3 missiles
5 Likes
I don´t like the new nerf on the Falcon and Amx 30 DCA. If the vehicle was carrying the ammunition, it seems unfair to take it away. A change of BR is preferable.
Bad moments…
5 Likes
Vehicle: IPM1
Gamemode: GRB
Position change: Folder after M1
Reason: With it being a direct upgrade to the M1, it should be placed after it, and due to not getting a more powerful gun, nor should it get full research cost, also currently being foldered after a vehicle with a higher be than it is silly.
Only the US ADATS has a gun, Britain’s doesnt.
Also what’s the ability for it to sometiimes kill tanks have to do with anything? In that regard its weaker than most 9.X ATGM vehicles. if that is the performance metric that matters, move the ADATS down to 9.3
1 Like
Ground RB:
Leclerc MSC: 11.0 > 10.7
6 Likes
that it can defend itself, and sure the adats should also move down to 11.7 probably but i was just suggesting the ItO
also the adats arleady is 11.7
AirRB
Mirage 2k- S5 12.7- 12.3 Only gets extra CMs over the 2k- S4 which is 12.3
See f-16 NETZ mod with double the amount of CMs than the NETZ yet same BR!
At least be consistent
2 Likes
Remember when the Stormer’s SACLOS could kill tanks since people thought it was a solid penetrator?
Kinda my point when compared to the IT0 in the only thing that actually matters as an SPAA
Vehicle: ItPsV Leopard
Gamemode: Realistic
Vehicle change: remove APDS belt with no BR change
Reason
Anti airs do not need apds. They are supposed to target planes and they have plenty of penetration with the AP belts. Fighting tanks should not be their primary role.
AirRB
Spitfire MK22 is the same BR as the MK24??
MK22 6.7- 6.3
3 Likes
Ground RB:
AMX-32 : 9.7 > 9.3
6 Likes