Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Ground RB :
MB 175 T : 3.3 → 3.0
Reason : it can only carry rockets and its canons are not efficient against ground targets.

4 Likes

But you see, it’s British

I think the Tsirchon is okay at 11.3, could go to 11.0 though. APS does help a decent but but it doesn’t really make sense for it to be at such a high br

just giving it the armor of a merkava would help it

like why does it have no armor

At which point, should they really be VTOL landing somewhere where they wouldnt be able to take off from again IRL?

(GRB) Merkava Mk3 (B/C/Ra’am Sagol) 11.3 > 10.7 — Should be on a same BR with early Leo 2s - inferior to them in any aspect except apfsds penetration. For some reasons have not recieved 5s reload like all abrams tanks did. Doesnt have armor or mobility.

IRL they’d probably either only refuel or take a lighter loadout, something you can’t do in ground RB because you’d have to pay the SP as if you were spawning a second plane

Vehicle: BI
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 6.7 → 7.7
Reason: At small grb map it very strong. With 25% of thrust can fly 6+m. Can intercept any bomber. Fast acceleration and rtb potentional. And similar with ki-200 and me-163 wich are at 8.0

6 Likes

nope, Lvkv gets the exact same APFSDS as the 9040C

i’m sorry, but not enough people are talking about that Falcon change.

Sure, the APDS belt is gone, but you’re not changing the BR? Like… Why? It is in no way better than the No-Radar Shilka at this point. Move it back down to 7.7 where it belongs! It has no radar to compensate as SPAA, like everything else at that BR, and now it lost the one reason to be at that BR. Move it down.

5 Likes

Please put the Su-30 Premiums at 13.7 and keep the F-15s at 13.0

not in war thunder, its missing the top pen round

I see… thought it had the same armement as the earlier 9040.
Was it always the case ?

AMX-30 S DCA
Ground Realistic
8.7 → 8.0 due to the new change.

4 Likes

What do you mean the T-64B is going to 10.3 and the T-80UD is staying at 10.3 as well???

no he is wrong it doesnt have the higher pen dart

the aim-7M has 5 degrees larger seeker gimbal over the aim-7F

Yep. Sea Harrier FRS1 operating as an emergency CAP from Atlantic Conveyor during the falklands ran a minimal load of fuel to allow for Vertical take-off. Whilst it was expected for them to be able to make an intercept, it was unlikely theyd be able to return to the cargo container. So they were only going to launch as an absolute last option

1 Like

8.0 rather. It’d be far worse than the Gepard at 8.3

1 Like