Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

I mean it is an intended feature for all VTOLs

does it? i dont think thats right

playable? now as 3.3 in a full uptier (which happens quite often) there is nothing against the PR206 and his friends which now can enjoy the slugfest again (maybe they complained…)

The fact that nothing has been done about the T58 yet is both hilarious and outrageous.

Vehicle : F5C
BR Change: ARB 10.7->10.3
engines are pretty weak and it only carries 2 missiles and which is already horrible only thing good about this jet is manueverablilty and guns everything else is pretty much s***,even J35XS sitting at 10.3 also F5 in the france TT has stronger engines+better missiles and its same br with F5C

Yeah, the only reason the Falcon has seen multiple BR increases is the APDS belt with the usually high rpm of spaa vehicles. Without that anti-tank role it has no business having the same BR as a Turms III for example.

1 Like

Lore accurate F15 gang

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: F-84F (All)

Changes:

  • 8.3 → 8.0
  • (Non-USA) Rank VI → Rank V to get its airspawn back.

it would be nice to see some more tech tree vehicles with the AIM-7P for like the f-14 maybe

maybe your worst take yet

Is it actually intended or just one of those wierd edge cases that Gaijin cant be bothered to fix?

same with you,they shouldnt change chieftains rp
only because player who play chieftains had better skills and let chieftains got high k/d?
unreasonable

How about making them allways unlimited?
Or making the new limit like 999

It should have the same rwr as the JAS39A (explains why the old RWR display is missing from the cockpit)

maybe 4.3, but i get your point

1 Like

AIR RB
Gaijin, my friends…You know exactly that the Rafale should have been at 15.0 for over a year already. We all know how you make your money with your system. But I think after a year it’s fair enough for it to go up, not down like planes such as the F-15A.
(And your premium seller, Su-30MKK should most certainly be rated at least 13.7 as well. 6Stk PL12 on 13.3 is way to crazy)

Please finally make a fair BR, give everything more space to breathe like the Non Fox3 planes to the Fox3 planes and move these super jets up to 15.0. So this way, all of us — the paying customers — can truly enjoy the many great vehicles you offer in your overall very great game.
ThX and for sure a good start into 2026:)

(GRB) Namer RCWS-30/Tsrikhon 11.3 > 10.7 — Worse wehicle then 2s38. Cant pen anything it faces. Because of its mobility, cant flank and supposed to fight 11.7 MBTs from the front. Spikes arent working as a real life counterpart and completely useless. looks really funny if compared to BMPTs.

Also:
This LT needs its ammunition rack fixed, making it like the BMPT’s, namely:

  1. split the belt into segments so it doesn’t burn out all at once from a passing shell
  2. add an ammunition resupply box
  3. add an additational ammo to the completely empty troop compartment (like 200x 30mm rounds and 6-8 additional spikes in total)

Since the developer decided that a 60-ton IFV doesn’t have enough armor, make it a fully-fledged support vehicle that can deal damage at least with its armament, since the spikes and bushmaster were implemented the way they are now in the game.

Currently, it can’t deflect apfsds with its hull, and when playing in a hull-down position, any hit in its unmanned module and namer loses all of its ammunition. This problem doesn’t exist on any vehicle I know with similar armament. Even the 2s38 has a better chance of surviving apfsds shot with its turret.

1 Like

It is since some VTOL aircraft can’t takeoff vertically when fully loaded so they’d be stuck at the helipad

any sources on that?

Mode: Air Realistic Battles

Aircraft: F6F-5N, F6F-5N (France)

Change: 4.3 → 4.0

4 Likes