It is, but with how tiny the maps are… Its not an optimal aircraft to use. It ideally needs space
I usually run the Hunter FGA9 as my CAP at 9.3
exactly, i killed som many T-72s in my gepard 1A2 just hitting the sights and overpressure the entire crew. (gaijin, nerf it, but not too much lol)
1 Like
Speaking of, why not move down the SRAAM hunter to 9.3 in grb?
1 Like
Oh, I know, but still we need the 9.7 one in-game and an actual 9.7 and 10.0 lineup
You could. quite easily. (not sure why I dont have a suggestion for that)
But for the exact same argument id have for the Harrier GR1 though
1 Like
You need to create for each aircraft a single post…
Like this:
Or this:
Vehicle: Object 279
Gamemode: All Ground
BR Change: 9.0 —> 9.3
Reason: The fact that you still continue to let this thing have its go at 8.0 tanks is absolutely beyond me when it is easily the best 9.0 in the game (yet you moved both of the worse Merkava Mk1 and now the British tanks to 9.3 instead lmfao). This will do perfectly fine at 9.3 and will still be among the top performing tanks there.
1 Like
no its an aa,
Lvkv means anti air gun carrier
Harrier would be too strong due to CCIP + Helipad Airspawn but the Hunter wouldn’t be as much of an issue
chieftain mk10 and 900 going to 9.3 feels very unfair.
There are a lot of tanks at 9.0 that more than match the mk 10 and 900.
The leopard A1A1 and OF40 MK2A and XM803 (my beloved) have equal or better turret laying and are more mobile.
The Taiwanese M60 TTS and T62M1 have better firepower and equivalent mobility and same-ish armour (one with composite one without) and about the same turret laying capabilities.
There are more 9.0 tanks that I consider better than the mk10 and 900, the TAM, the ZTZ88s, even the M60 TTS in the USA tech can do the ESS thermal trick.
That might actually be all the 9.0 tanks in the game oops, well I guess it makes my point.
Please don’t move the Mk10 and 900 up, the Mk10 is gimmicky and entirely map dependant, the 900 is better in that it is more useful generally but I wouldn’t take it over any of the 9.3 British tanks meaning it would be like a 4th spawn meaning in practice I’d never likely use it in a lineup at 9.3.
Thanks for reading my rant , kay bye.
3 Likes
its the same APHE as the Rarden, i.e. basically worthless against anything with side armour, you can get lucky and pixel hunt a weak-spot but eh, not worth it.
YAK-3U
5.7->6.3
blatantly op at its br cause how strong it is can out dogfight most things and can out energy what it cant out dogfight
7 Likes
Ngl Most Aircraft based APHE belts are abit OP-
You should either reduce the explosive damage on the Belts or Reduce so its not more than like 1 APHe Round in the Belt and have the rest be AP rounds-
I know The russian 45mm and japanese 30mm belts are abit OP
1 Like
Guys, no one talking about how the 2S6 Tuguska is untouched. How is this thing 10.7 meanwhile the best SPAA eveyrone have is a Roland 3 which struggle to hit a maneuvering heli?
5 Likes
Japanese 30mms arent nearly as much of a problem because of their low pen and high dispersion
1 Like
Mode: Air RB
Vehicle: Yak-3
Recommendation: BR 4.3 to 4.7
Reasoning:
- Armament:
The too low BR of Yak-3s made sense in the pre-real shatter era as the damage output of the 20 mm ShVak cannons was (historically correct) very weak.
The changes of real shatter and adding things like adjusted ballistics made the 20 mm ShVak a very potent weapon - easy to use thanks to very flat ballistic curve and center mounted.
You can actually outrange any plane with German MG 151s in a headon at high speed - thanks to way better ballistics and thanks to the not processed bug report regarding MG 151s, as the self destructing mine shells explode after travelled distance and not after 3 seconds (which would be historically accurate). - Flight performance:
If you compare the climb rate up to 5.000 meters with current peers you might find out that just a few planes (like Pyoerremski, 109 G-6 or F8F) are able to get to co-alt before the merge - otherwise your team has to rely on fighters with interceptor spawn to push them low. Seeing that most of Air RB fights takes place at the sweet spot of Yak-3s (= 4 km alt and lower) the 4.3 BR is a joke as outperforms as a whole (speed, climb, turn) almost anything - (except Spits and JP planes) due to superior energy retention. A plane which saw combat in September / October 1944 should fight contemporary aircraft of the Luftwaffe (their sole opponent until August 1945); the currently way too low BR is just the result of poor pilots (similar to most US fighters).
9 Likes
Don’t bother with high tier naval. Use 5.7 British ships, HMS London and HMS Invincible. You also have HMS Glorious but 15 inch guns at that BR are kind of useless.
Very rarely did I get uptiered. I spaded HMS London in 20 games with 48 kills and just a single death.
What about the 9UT? Same 45mm, Even better plane.
Idk lol i have had a really good time with them lmao
M2K-5F most likely gonna benefit from 14.7 decompression, looking forward to playing that one.
1 Like