Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

This is horrible game design, you cannot just limit the options of dealing with a tank to spawning a plane. The Maus should be killable by other tanks.

J-7E
GRB:
10.3 → 11.0
Why is it the same BR as the MiG-21BIS in GRB, let alone the MiG-21SMT / MiG-21MF???

1 Like

F-104G
Air realistic
11.0->10.7
Exact same engine as the 9.3 one, while 21bis at same rating as a much better engine than the 9.3 21. Zero reason they should be the same rating.

3 Likes

Ground RB.
Is-2 1944 6.7->6.3

Inferior to every other 6.7 heavy tank, It has terrible gun depression and an abysmal reload.

It received BR-471D when it moved up in an attempt to justify it, However BR-471D is WORSE than the other shells it has, Only offering a small flat pen increase at the cost of way worse angled pen(which matters more than flat) and worse HE filler.
This shell was also originally removed because the IS-2’s didn’t ever carry it, So not only should the tank move back down it should also lose the non-historical shell thats useless anyway.

7 Likes

lovely, but still ignoring a lot of ww2 BRs, specially mr. wyvern S.4 and mr. yak-3 (4.3)
still, thank you a lot

3 Likes

Cool? Really wanna put a meta airframe at 12.0 to bully 11.0 ig

Agreed, it’s so much worse than the KT that it’s not even funny.

1 Like

CAS isn’t that much of an issue at 7.7
the Maus does really well at 7.7 and when downtiered
there is literally no reason to move it down to fight things that literally cannot kill it

1 Like

Agreed, Mr. gfdrfgedg (short for Jonathan)

2 Likes

I think you hit the wrong reply

1 Like

Mirage 2000D-R1
GRB:
11.3 → 11.7
Extremely oppressive against SPAAs, being able to carry 2x AS-30Ls and 2x GBU-12s, along with 2x Magic 2s to deal with other aircraft.

1 Like

no screw this thing, its still going to be incredibly frustrating to face


send it to 12.7 and its still going to do fine

Ah yes I did, oops

1 Like

T-72B3 → 11.7
it should not move downwards

4 Likes

AT BR 10.0 AND LOWER:
All missiles with overload of 18 G or more and/or effective rear aspect range exceeding 3 km in a tail chase at ground speed 1000 km/h at altitude 2000m should be removed from all aircraft.

This is due to most aircraft not having any countermeasure and there being no effective counterplay to these missiles at these BRs, especially due to poor spotting making it very difficult to see these enemies sometimes

1 Like

The only justification i can see for the F18E being 14.7 is if it at least got the aim120D otherwise im kinda lost as to what’s going on here

2 Likes

yes

How much we bet they will fall for the most gullible-catching bait

2 Likes

Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Plane:Kurnass 2000
Br change: 12.3>12.0
Reasoning: It’s a Phantom with 6 Python-3s, extra flares and no radar missiles .3 higher than another Phantom with 4 decent IR missiles, 4 decent radar missiles. Pythons-3s are good non-IRCCM missiles and more flares are nice, but it’s has no radar missiles. It has no right to be 12.3, the same br as an F-16 and also fighting the Jf-17,F-16D and the su30mkk in a full uptier.

1 Like

Vehicle: MiG-29 9-13 and 9-12A/B
Gamemode: Air battles in general
Change: Add the R-73 and remove the R-27ER from their loadout
reason: The MiG-29 at 12.7 is outclassed by other jets at its BR due to it only having 2 usable missiles in the R-27ER while its R-60M are obsolete for its BR bracket giving it a unbalanced loadout. Removing the R-27ER and adding the R-73 to it would make its loadout much more balanced overall with it trading in a insanly powerful sarh for more power full ir missiles

5 Likes