Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

The thing you never knew is not that. It is that the naval vehicle requirements are different than for tanks/planes/helis.

Which is irrelevant. Quality issues are not represented in game for all vehicles and nations. You dont seem to have a problem with late war german armor being the same quality as interwar armor.

And then you guys would complain about the BR of the ship since then it would be at around 7.7.

It is not as the original plans specified that number. Unless you want to say that Gaijin was around 80+ years ago, then this point is just meaningless.

Its not. Deal with it.

1 Like

Vehicle: Mi-28Nm
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 13.0 -----> 13.3
Reason:
Immune to any IR missile, one taps any tank ingame with the LMUR. Additionally the chin mounted gun behaves like a laser railgun and shreds incoming planes (which cant fight it otherwise).

3 Likes

The MiG-29 needs the R-73. The F-15A is going to 12.7 while it gets AIM-9Ms!

1 Like

Crazy idea: raise a vehicle’s BR when they actually get buffs and not months/years in advance

2 Likes

wow really? why not, enlighten me then

I would suggest a top BR for Air to be 15.0, it’s the bare minimum we should have at this point in time already, all the 14.7s in that list go to 15.0, the 14.3s go to 14.7 and 14.0s to 14.3, would give a lot of breathing room to the 13.0s up to 13.7s to basically play in a bubble of their own for the most part. Seriously these top tier AESAs have no business even touching merely upgraded 80s gen 4s. Also the F-104S ASA should go down to 11.3 or 11.7 at the very least, because 9Ls and Aspides with a mediocre radar and a bad RWR do not justify it being 12.0, the same BR as a F-4J/S which have HMD, a far better radar, double the missile count (with AIM-7Fs being vastly superior to the Aspide), the MiG-23ML/A/D are also lower in BR than the ASA which makes 0 sense.

Vehicle: F-14A
Gamemode: Air Realistic
Change: no BR change, add AIM-9L missiles

A configuration with no AIM-9L missiles was used for balance reasons that are no longer an issue nowadays with F-14 being among the less competitive planes of their BR, yet incapable of going any lower due to ARH access.

5 Likes

Vehicle: CS/SA05
Gamemode: RB
BR Change: 12.0 -----> 11.7
Reason: this SPAA dont have good missiles like only 20g also missiles dont have much energy

1 Like

As much as i wish for this. Gaijn needs changes that are 80% good and 20% bad. If they make the decompression too big it will affect que times. Which cant be changed. My recommendations fixed the issue 80% with the 20% bad maintaining current que times.

And what is your source for this, may I enquire?

And give the damn B its 9M

1 Like

Of which?

tell me, what is any let’s say 6.3 tank gonna do to a Maus
then tell me what a 5.7 tank would do against it

1 Like

Vehicle: F-14B
Gamemode: Air Realistic
Change: no BR change, add AIM-9M missiles

A configuration with no AIM-9M missiles was used for balance reasons that are no longer an issue nowadays with F-14 being among the less competitive planes of their BR, yet incapable of going any lower due to ARH access.

4 Likes

Tu-4 (ussr, china)
Air realistic battle
Suggest br: 8.0 → 9.0

They are annoying when they run away all match and bomber turrets are far too accurate at all brs.

2 Likes

Vehicle: BMPT
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.3 → 12.3/12.7
Reason:
Self explaining…
Or just make it behave a bit realistic that

  • it blows up if the belt ammo is hit
  • damages at least the turret and autocannon when one of the missile gets hit
  • Finally takes reliably damage from side shots.
7 Likes

“it will affect queue times” my 14.3 matchmaker is almost instant with RARELY any downtier to lower than 13.7, the top bracket will NOT be affected, neither would be the new 12.0-13.0 they could create. Stop believing gaijins lies

Vehicle: F-16A (USA)
Game mode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: Lack of SARH missiles and introduction of various 12.7 planes with high count of flares lead to one of the sharpest drops in perfomance in the past year. It has the lowest K/D of all fighter jets at Rank 8 US. It is even lower than the 12.3 F-20A which is a premium option and expected to have an influx of newer players driving the K/D down.

Is this guys just baiting atp?

2 Likes

brother wants to kill 11.0 for good