Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Have you tried playing the game at least once? Aren’t you bothered by the queues at this rank? Or why is everyone so keen to keep playing for the USSR? It must be so hard to understand.

Gaijin will need monthly statistics on the BMPT before doing anything
And we don’t have those yet

So nothing is happening

Seriously? Why did they raise their BR from 10.3 to 10.7 then? When there weren’t even any monthly statistics?

The T26E5 being at the same br as the t29 and t34 and m46 is crazy (in arcade).
The tank is has a lot off armor but its not unkillable.
I feel like the speed trade off for armor is not worth it and fighting anything with apds and heat is a death sentance.(German 8.0,Russsia 8.0,UK 8.0,Israel 8.0 etc…)
Its current br is fine it can be killed with he and heat vehicles at its br and there are many weak spots to one shot it.
Its 6.7 br is fine and balanced,7.0 is too high for the current state of the game.
If the max br was 13.7 in ground i would understand.

1 Like

That was the moment it was introduced
So we had clean stats unaffected by previous br placements

Now, the stats are still affected by its previous br placement at 10.7

So again, we don’t have the monthly stats for it at 11.3
Meaning that nothing is gonna happen

Ridiculous excuses, so you want to make the players suffer for a couple more weeks to make an obvious decision. That’s so brilliant.

2 Likes

I honestly don’t believe it is that obvious

There is so much cope going around regarding some vehicles that they end up moving up/down more than they should due to player complaints

Especially if it’s a popular vehicle getting spammed constantly

I feel like that’s overkill maybe

yak3u defo deserves a 1.0 br increase minimum

why??? oh my god why??? t64B was good on 9.7 but on 10.0 was very HARD and now t64B go on 10.3?? really??? this is crazy!! make BR only from players statistic is nonsense!! T26E5 good armor but unplayable gun and he go on 7.0? OK but t29 not go on 7.7??? why?? and vk3002 on 5.0 is OP why he go not on 5.7?? T58 on 8.3 is cancer!! up him on 9.0!!! Flakpanzer 1 Gepard on 8.3 is absolut cancer for all!! Gepard is minimum 10!!! Gepard is 8.3 and he kill me front in turret with my T72 or T80 or T64B or Leo 2A4. and when i have Br 7.3 and i have versus me in uptier gepard 8.3 so he have ATOM for 2 minutes!! he must go on 10br!!

I have the premium version and the upgradeable one as well. It’s not in my best interests to demand a higher combat rating, but I have to admit – the BMPT’s atrocious settings make it incredibly durable. It can survive direct hits from six Mavericks, and a direct hit from an LS-6 with an IR seeker.

I’ll edit the post a little then.

The main issue with the BMP-T is that the ammo just doesn’t explode and even if you ammo rack it
It doesn’t actually go away

The AAM-4B doesn’t provide much over the AAM-4, just the AESA seekerhead.

Maybe when they add AAM-5s to the F-2A the ADTW could get AAM-4s.

1 Like

I don’t think that’s the main problem; I’d leave it. This solution would be fine for other similar light tanks and infantry fighting vehicles. The main problem is that its abnormal survivability, combined with the heavy firepower of its guns, makes it an incredibly toxic vehicle. Yes, there are vulnerable spots, but goodness, try hitting them when a hail of shells is flying right into your sights.

The ammo not actually going away is why it’s so survivable

Me 262 A-1/U4 GRB: 6.7->7.7 Shreds through every tank it comes across.
Ar 234 B-2 GRB: 6.3->7.3 Jet bomber this low is insane. You might as well put the B57A at 6.3 if you’re going to have the Ar 234 B-2 this low.
AR 234-C-3 GRB: 7.3->7.7
Yak 9UT GRB: 6.0->7.7/8.0 Get this over power plane up to where it sees radar spaa or remove the HVAP belt entirely.
M26 RB: 6.7->6.3 Why play this tank when there’s already the Jumbo Pershing and the Super Pershing at the same br. No one plays this tank at this br.

Well, to be honest, I have never seen a belt with such small shells explode in my life, and their detonation certainly does not lead to the destruction of vehicles.

I’ve already addressed this. the F-4EJ ADTW and Lazur-M weren’t top tier when they were added. Nor have they had any additions which makes them even close to top tier.

Along with this. I’ve already stated that I’d like TT vehicles to have some difference from the Premium ones.

Just because it HAS been done doesn’t mean it SHOULD be done again.

U.S. Win rates go to the negative. 🥀

“Instead of fixing the top tier premium problem let’s just keep adding stuff and act like it doesn’t exist.”

Already did.