The fact that the su30’s and the jf17 is both at 13.3 shows how absurd the compression is
i still think the other AH-64E Guardians need their DIRCM Removed, China already has the 10ME, The Dutch don’t have the DIRCM, Indonesia don’t have the DIRCM and the JAGM needs a huge buff as their max lock is sub 6 km and with every Ruzzian player getting a Pansir you have like 4 seconds you can search and launch just to get a “Hit”. Besides that getting a “Hit” is lucky now considering if every player can spawn a Pansir they can either shoot the missile down or them dying does a larger effect with how wack the JAGMs seeker is it will just hit the body
1 Like
Just some F tier rage bait by some Vatnik i bet
1 Like
Almost all messages in this topic about 2S38 focus on its nerfing instead of buffing other similar struggling vehicles.
So It should be better than PUMA VJTF. It will be interesting to see.
the hit simulator is basicly based on the wrong lofting angle, ( only russia got a got one ofc ) alot of issues has been posted about it.
and i am pretty sure the jagm speed is unrealistic
just a sad situtation overall
“Oh look i finally got my F-15A from 1972 this will be so fun”
- Here comes a Gripen from 2025
2 Likes
it is better than the puma
Well gaijin also believes that HEAT is a thin line of damage which is just wrong
1 Like
So the F-15A’s get downtiered but not F-14A or B…
F-14A vs F-15A
- Eagle can bring much better IR missiles, while Tomcat is stuck with AIM-9H
- Eagle has a noticeably higher thrust-to-weight ratio
- Eagle has a higher G limit, meaning it can pull harder for longer
- Eagle has 4 times more countermeasures than Tomcat
- Eagle can carry GBU-8 while Tomcat carries Zunis and up to 2000lbs dumb bombs
- Eagle can carry Napalm without compromising its missile loadouts
- Eagle has around 30% more ammo for the M61
- Tomcat can carry more sparrows, but their quality in the past few years is questionable
- Tomcat can bring AIM-54, meaning it can shoot first from further away, but the A model requires constant TWS updates until the radar turns on otherwise the missile WILL go dumb
- Tomcat has nose authority near stall speeds
F-14B vs F-15A
- Eagle can still bring better IR missiles, AIM-9M vs AIM-9L
- Eagle still has a noticeably higher thrust-to-weight ratio
- Eagle still has a higher G limit, meaning it can pull harder for longer
- Eagle still carries Napalm without interfering with its A2A weapons
- Eagle still has around 30% more ammo for the M61
- Tomcat now carries up to 3 times the amount of CMs if you bring 4x BOL pods, although their flares aren’t as effective
- Tomcat can bring 4x JDAMs and/or Laser-guided bombs
- Tomcat can still carry more sparrows, however AIM-7F and M models are identical in every regard
- Tomcat can now bring AIM-54C, which only brings a seeker head improvement
- Tomcat still has superior near-stall nose authority
TLDR: F-15A is better and more survivable than F-14A, and I think moving it down to 12.7 is a mistake. If F-14B is gonna stay at 13.0 at least give it AIM-9M as well.
7 Likes
That is a Extremely brain dead take smh. If you are struggling in the F-14s you have one of two problems.
- You got a uptier against other Fox 3s.
- You are the problem.
Only thing a agree with is that the B should get the 9M and while at it the A should finally get its 9L.
1 Like
That is not a vehicle issue, it’s a gameplay issue on your end. When you treat a SHORAD as a front line assault tank, you will get expected results. Just like with other IFVs/AFVs not intended for that role.
Furthermore the PUMA is worse than the 2S38…
And now please tell me how well a Bushmaster or other 30mm do against russian armor. Especially in the frontal arc.
Please tell me which other vehicle perform similar/better in its role of tank support/SHORAD.
The 2S38 has seen no changes aside from extra internal modules since it’s addition.
3 Likes
it got a ammo stowage buff so it can fire continuesly
1 Like
ah yes. Forgot about that XD
No nerfs without buffs for these vehicles ey
1 Like
Vehicle: Potez 633
Game Mode: Air RB / Air Realistic
BR change: BR 1.7 shall remain ant not reduced to BR 1.3
Reasoning:
In the BR change table you addressed a BR decrease from 1.7 to 1.3.
This makes zero sense if you compare this aircraft with the higher BR versions of the same aircraft and check the number of matches played and kills per match.
As soon as the model has 2 times more matches played than the two other versions together and the KpB ratio is 0,07 (~10 times lower) it is imho obvious that you need to use common sense.
In the latest “Fairplay banlist” you banned a hell of cheaters with bot scripts - a lot of them used exactly this aircraft - that’s why it has abysmally bad stats. So the poor performance was created by bot scripts, not player performance - no need for a lower BR 😎
In addition: These aircraft turn extremely well and are way too fast for an BR 1.3 opponent.
3 Likes
- its not hard to trash an AIM-54 if you know its coming
- Eagle will beat a Tomcat in close quarters more often than not
- F-15A being able to turn harder and accelerate faster while carrying a much better IR missile is something you can’t simply say is a skill issue for F-14A
1 Like
Mf if your close in a F-14 that is the first problem
Seafire III
UK/France
Air Realistic: 5.0 - 4.3
It does not have the performance to face 5.0+ aircraft and it’s much closer to the 4.3 Spitfire Mk IX
1 Like
I am aware. He only plays russia. There are reasons as to why he has these opinions.
1 Like
Am sorry to tell you but if you think the f14s are good then I assume you die to them and if thats the case then you are the problem
1 Like