Seafire III
UK/France
Air Realistic: 5.0 - 4.3
It does not have the performance to face 5.0+ aircraft and it’s much closer to the 4.3 Spitfire Mk IX
I am aware. He only plays russia. There are reasons as to why he has these opinions.
Am sorry to tell you but if you think the f14s are good then I assume you die to them and if thats the case then you are the problem
BVR for the most part is dead since most players know to stay low, which helps negate the Tomcats only advantage and allows the Eagle to run it down no matter the altitude. Yeah the radar on the F-14 is strong but when you have inferior flight performance regardless of payload and altitude the F-15 is absolutely gonna close the distance and press it’s own advantage.
How is that problem
Because it has the worst ARH in the game that means it must have AIM-9Hs
I think that it is reasonable to give the tomcats better loadouts
F-14 radar is only better in range as it lacks the full PD that the F-15As radar has
Plus its head on only, pretty easy to abuse that limitation as well
Yeah it is
i wouldnt have a problem with the missile loadouts if it wasn’t seeing 13.7 almost every match
You are again transferring everything to personal experience. I don’t see the point of the discussion. And where did you see the players using it as assault tank?
If its true, better to buff PUMA lowering its br to 10.3 instead of nerfing 2S38.
Decompression and flanking.
Begleitpanzer with 1.56 kills per death on 9.7 for example.
No changes?
chieftain mk 10 and the chieftain 500
the planned br change for these two tanks are unneeded and unfounded
they are 2 out of 3 9.0 GB tree has access to, there capibilites, win rates and armor art good enouth to be facing 10.3 tanks
moving them up would be a mistake and have them suffer alot more
they are perfectly fine and capable at 9.0

Whatever russia main.
nah personally i agree with moving the 2S38 up, it’s one of the best multirole ground vehicles in the game thats only limited by whoever gets the first shot off. Puma IFV I’m a little conflicted about because its definitely not the worst where it is but the stock grind still isn’t fun even after they gave it a full APDS belt stock
bro missed the part where you acknowledged your mistake
Battle rating does not exist, so that the vehicle is protected from being crushed, they exist to stop other vehicles from being crushed by it. currently the T-80UD murders 9.3s; it should go up to 10.7 to change this. Anything “better” than it is. furthermore you have a conflict of interest since you exclusively play the T-80UD as your main vehicle. If I were to play the M1A1 the most, and I said it shouldn’t go up from 11.3 (when M829A1 was first added to it), it would be silly, as it would sealclub.
Vickers MK 7 : 10.7 → 10.3 or reload buffed to 5s (same as challenger).
Explanation: Only 3 second first stage ammo rack. 10+ sec reload after you run out of first stage ammo rack. Worst turret armour of any mbt in the br bracket (except ofc ariete p). Outdated ammo storage at the br it is. Soviet autoloaders can out-reload non-ace crew with better rounds at the br and ofc have much better first stage ammo stowage.
Without a thermal sight, I can’t see the T-80UD at 10.7. It’s funny how everyone ignores its awful -4 km/h reverse speed. This tank can’t back up after firing like the Abrams does. Compared to the T-80B at 10.7, the T-80UD only has Kontakt-V instead of Kontakt-I. But at least the T-80B can back up after firing.
all apache E have dircm turn on game



