stat bias good players play a vehicle and it gets crazy kds then gets over tiered hence why you see the T44 at 6.7 even though its basically a 6.3 russian jumbo
which is why i hate stat balancing
stats of a vehicle should be treated as a secondary source not a primary source of it its OP or not
I haven’t played them in a bit, but I remember them being quite good. Is that not the case anymore? Sure they’re slow and all, but they have great maneuverability, they’re like the Zero of early jets imo.
Both of them are really good though.
T20 is really mobile, 5.9s reload with decent shell and explosive filler, has a stab, and is quite small.
It’s used by seal clubbers to gain positions on the leaderboard:
Tiger has one-shot APHE with decent penetration and relatively good armour.
That Tiger being a now off-sale premium pack, so newer players can’t buy and use it.
The MiG-29G has R-73s.
Average Russian main behavior projecting, calling others as mains out of insecurities.
I can concede the RWR, but having a bad radar is absolutely a void argument if your SARH missiles carry IOG+DL
HMS-less, you have to point the entire nose or begin to touch ACM modes, pointing the plane’s nose anyway to lock an effectively worse SARH than the R-27ER.
Up to no one’s suprise, Russian mains glorifying the F-15A, one of the most overrated planes in the entire game and it’s not even close.
The T58 is one of those tanks that the only way you are winning against it is when it don’t know you’re there.
I would prefer a nerf to its turret rotation to about 15-20 degrees per second and a BR increase to 8.7.
Since Autoloaders affect French BRs and 1 single japanese tank so much, why not affect U.S tanks so much?