I mean me neither but as long as it is there there isnt much of a reason for the 122 to be lower when it has better mobility and LRF, the only advantage that i can think of for the 435 is 14.5
at the BR of 8.3 the META shifts from armor to reaction time and fire power
- That list is a bit old
- The type 60 is frontally .50 cal proof
- 6.7 Japan and 7.3 Japan are rather oppressive.
japan at 6.7 is not very opressive the 5.7 m36 has same round as have the HEAT FS slingers of the br
A coax or roof 14.5? Or both?
Regardless that isn’t much of an advantage XD it’s like a 20 round belt. Compared to a .50 cal that feels like I can fire forever.
If you’re talking about the type 60 rat tank it is NOT 50 cal proof frontally
1 Like
just the roof, i mean i like them but it isnt really that huge of an advantage over the 12.7mm on the object 122
checks statshark, sees backrage has played no 6.7 Japanese tank
It can take out barrels, which the 12.7mm can’t.
It’s kinda niche but if you’re barrelled, you can fool people into pushing.
You can take out barrels while you’re in cover too.
why is opressive then buddy use some stats or objective facts and ill actually care
Taking out barrels with the 14.5 is not practically possible 99% of the time
1 Like
tell me you are an american main without telling me you are an american main, you should fly the MiG more often, and you will understand why a plane with R-60s and an awful radar and RWR should not sit at the same br of smth like the F-15A with x4 IRCCM missiles and double the amount of SARH, not even counting the avionics…
let’s just hope they are gonna act on it
They used to hit planes a bit harder than the 12.7s but they definitely feel nerfed to the level of a 12.7, because I love the btr-152D and I used to be able to annihilate planes, break wings, set fires, etc. but a few updates ago, it seems like they got the Russian 12.7 treatment, where you have to pilot snipe or they’re crap.
Which makes me sad
BTR-152D is now buried
sure at close range, but i dont really see how that beats the 4 ready to use missile that the 122 has
if it had R73s it be a fair fight if they didnt add the stupid 13.3 fox 3 spammers none of this would be happening
Better reload and fuel tanks absorbing shots too.
Though I agree that even that isn’t really enough to justify not having those ATGMs.
I think you’re sticking too closely to what the classifications are, instead of actual performance specifically in the 12.7-13.7 range.
The Mig-29G is worse than the F-2A ADTW and F-15As, and they should swap BRs. It also should not be the same BR as the objectively and significantly better Su-27s.
The Harriers are worse than, or on par with several of those 13.3s. No reason for the FA2 to be a higher BR than a Mig-29 with R-73s/R-27Rs.
F/A-18As would need to go up, and the Cs do as well.
The F-5TH would need to go down, as it’s loadout is exceptionally weak when compared to planes like the Tornado F.3 Late or F-4F ICE.
I think the higher BRs of the proposal are good, and it matches closely to my decompression proposal.
R-73 would be nice but then it would justify having the F-15A at 12.7
I really think that if it ends up being put at that br it should get 9Ls instead of Mikes, because the MiG-29A with R-73s at 12.7 would create the same issues
1 Like
try doing one post per vehicle
gaijin may not listen to posts with multiple