I unironically enjoy not knowing about what should go where, all I want is the Chi ri dropped by 1 or 2 br brackets
1 Like
VT-4: BR 12.3 to 12.0
VT-4A1: BR 12.7 to 12.3
Folded with each other after the MBT-2000.
The VT-4 and VT-4A1 are not worthy of being in the 12.3 and 12.7 BR. These tanks are comparable to the Challenger 2 (11.7) and M1A1 (11.7) in terms of overall effectiveness.
The VT-4s currently being 12.3 and 12.7 result in these vehicles having no redeeming qualities, not even in comparison to the ZTZ99A at 12.3, which has better overall armor and mobility, let alone the: M1A1 and A2 at 12.0, Leopard 2a5/6/7/ (12.3 and 12.7), T-90M and T-80BVM (12.7), Type 10 and its prototypes (12.0 and 12.7), Ariete AMV (12.3), Leclerc (12.7), STRV 122 (12.7), and Merkava Mk.4 (12.3 and 12.7 for some reason).
Additionally, its modification tree should incorporate BTA4 in some sort of way. This round was first seen in the exported VT-4s to Pakistan and Thailand.
1 Like
So let’s take a look.
Obj 906 has ~667k games, with 1.07 KPS.
That’s pretty good considering it’s a tech tree vehicle.
I think it would make sense to uptier it to 8.3.
Turm III has ~801k games, with 1.18 KPS.
Now let’s consider the fact that it’s premium (meaning anyone can get it at any point, even new players), and it’s fully spaded off the get go.
That’s really good!
I think it would make sense to uptier it to 8.7.
T32E1 is interesting.
It has 179k games and a 1.02 KPS, which is above average.
The reason why I wouldn’t say it should be uptiered is because it has a much smaller sample size. (179k)
Compared to the Obj 906’s 667k, it’s more likely that the average T32E1 player is better than the average Obj 906 player.
I wouldn’t say it should be uptiered.
MAUS has 1,076,000 games, which is quite a lot.
Really good stats.
On one hand the Maus is actually pretty good, but on the other hand the people who play it typically experienced players or active players who at the very least has Germany at rank V.
Not everyone has access to it or purchase it because it’s exclusive.
It can go either way.
T32 has 463k games, but a 0.98 KPS.
Far more games than the T32E1 and it’s probably the reason why its stats are so mediocre compared to the T32E1
Not nearly the amount of games as the Obj 906, and yet still has worse KPS.
It seems fine where it is.
I know this way of thinking may not be the best way, but it’s one good way of thinking about it other than comparing characteristics and properties.
maus is genuinely op at 7.7 since the buffs it got highest pen filler round thats not the object 279 at 9.3
it cant be frontally killed by any 6.7 tank without a trap shot now due to its armor buff
yes lets put it at 12,0
Su-30mkk 13.3 → 13.7
Su-30mk2 amv 13.3 → 13.7
A-5C 10.7 → 10.3
BMPT → 11.7 (it’s a direct upgrade over bmpt-72)
Saab 105OE 8.3 → 8.0 (grb)
Ju288 6.0 → 6.3 (grb)
He 177 A-3 & A-5 6.3 → 6.0 (naval $ ground arcade)
Also I would like for chieftain mk.10 to remain at 9.0 as even if its stats are decent the vehicle is to impractical for a br increase.
4 Likes
what buffs?
one post per vehicle
1 Like
Its objective.
Typical UniqueScorpions cope post lmao
It is already 8.0
A good round? Excellent Armour? What lmao
The turret mantlet can be lol penned by APDS and the copula is an APHE magnet that will kill the entire turret crew. Any 105mm HEAT can go through the armour (even the spaced armour) like butter.
Less said about the APDS the better, as it’s prone to shattering.
What? Just what? I don’t even know how to respond to this its so full of cope lmao
I agree it needs to go up, but like
Just shoot the turret? Left or right side will either wipe the turret crew or set off the ammunition lmao
Again just shoot the turret? the turret is basically paper and doesn’t have the same weird bounces as the Marder hull
So you want to checks notes Move up the entire Japanese 6.7 line up huh?
Some addition notes though:
-The Type 60 isn’t .50cal proof lmao
-around 6.0s is a fairly normal reload at this BR (for example, M41 & Centurion 17pdr have 5.9, ELC & Aubl 74 has 6.7.)
4 Likes
no they just need to nerf the armor
Is it that bad? I have no idea
1 Like
genuinely makes loose braincells these takes are the worst ive ever seen
1 Like
my bad I mean the 906 or whatever the 8.0 aphe slinger
I just miss using it with the Chi to and Chi to late
It’s alright at it’s br but it would mean dragging the Chi to’s to a bad environment
Air RB it has basically always been tolerable kit + flight performance.
When you get to all air trees top tier, I will be interested to see how your views change.
1 Like
so back in the day majority of 6.7s could pen the cheek of the maus now they cant and it can pen them everywhere with the squeeze bore round its very op
I have no idea what any of those are, I’m just surprised to hear that it’s bad enough to deserve a 2.0 reduction
1 Like
I thought brackets were by 0.3 my bad, I meant dropped by 0.3/0.7
1 Like
they did the chi ri dirty
2 Likes