Yes, but unlike the others, the AIM-120 is designed for full BVR. It’s normal that it doesn’t have 50G’s, but it’s still excellent. Just use it at the right time and in the right way.
Who cares about your experience when we literally have direct evidence available?
All right, if you think so, feel free, I have nothing to prove.
That’s two way street logic.
Also 3k games isn’t 5k.
Which means this thing is in dire need of a nerf, if you think the obj.906 is.
I think your thinking about this is an unfair way. Over KDr is the thing that determines br.
Otherwise:
All these other tanks should go up along with the e100, etc etc
Well seeing how a 0.1 K/D in a top tier jet is incredibly impressive even for a stock grind, I haven’t made any assumptions from the start.
that literally won’t help you when the enemy can just force it close-range
in a joust with any AIM-120 carrier and something like an R-77 carrier at a similiar br the 120 carrier will lose the missile fight unless they can somehow force a dogfight
I spoke from experience, I have no evidence, but all the logic behind the change in BRs is experience, only the gaijin have statistics.
This as well
I disagree, but opinions are opinions, I’m not going to debate them, I like both.
We have statistics and evidence as well
you can look at which vehicles tend to be better throughout top tier
it’s almost always a vehicle with a hard-to-avoid medium range fox-3
This is such a great idea. I hope the devs will see this, because there is no reason to play the F-18C.
how it feels to read some of these peoples takes on some vehicles
4 Likes
I literally outpulled his missile lmao
good example of why close range perf is more important
1 Like
As Gaijin exemplify, evidence and statistics are worse than useless without the ability to correctly interpret them.
Maybe Chi ri to 5.3/5.0? I miss using it with the Chi-to and Chi-to late
Wow bigger pen number better round surely.
Also no nerf for obj605 ?
I already said, I like both types of missiles. I play differently than you show, but again, opinions are opinions.
I’m simply following objective facts and what is meta currently
1 Like
- No lol the Is-4 has decently better armor than the IS-6
- KV-1B is better, as it doesn’t face the German high power guns, and the Russian ones can’t do much to their own tank.
- If the T-54 can’t see 6.3s then why can M47s? Or m48s see 6.7? Logical fallacy.
Irony?
1 Like
I don’t agree with your view of the game, but I respect it.