Reason: The F15A is objectively better then the F14B in almost every comparable metric and yet is going to sit at a higher BR? The F14 has worse IR missiles, weaker radar, and weaker flight performance. even if the F14B is to receive the AIM9M (which it should have already btw) its still worse so it should ultimately receive the AIM9M and go to 12.7 or the better option the F14B should receive the AIM9M and keep both of them at 13.0
Check monthly stats.
Then compare amount of games and adjust the KPS / KDR based on that.
E-100 has 5000 games this december and has 4.33 KDR.
5000 is a very small sample size, and so although the E-100 is good, it’s most likely the players that are good.
1 IS4 has similar if not worse armor protection than the IS6 while having worse mobility and slower reload
2 KV1E/B are the most abused op vehicles know to man and should not face any 3.3s
3 T54 1947 has No right facing 6.3 jumbos and the 1949 has NO RIGHT FACING 6.7s. the 1947s way more mobile than the tiger 2 with a larger gun
and the 1949 has 100MM sabot has no right being lower than lepoard 1 and m60 that its equal to
you do realise that you’re then relying on the enemy to have their brain shut off?
the average shitter knows how to notch the 30km launches
missile performance is most relevant at 15km for the average person
or 10 for good players
Don’t worry guys. The Gepard still sits at the same BR as the Falcon and is .4 BR lower than the AMX-30 S DCA, yet it will still continue shredding people with zero planned changes. Same goes for the ZA-35 (even more OP), PGZ09, Type 87, etc etc etc…