@warmachine998
It is recommended to do one post per vehicle
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT there are no rules posted for vehicle br suggestion posts, such as no multiple vehicle suggestions allowed, can this be remedied?
reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
1 Like
Right, and T-80B has at least 1st gen thermal sight and -11km/h reverse speed, higher max speed and slightly more powerful engine and lower mass. If T-80UD gets thermals and higher reverse speed at 10.7, then it might be okay.
The T80UD.
The planned BR changes for the 9.0 chieftains is very silly. Now they have to face TURMs and T80UDs? They’ll just be flat out inferior to the majority of their competition at 9.3. The MBT-70, T-72A, Leo 1A5 are all fundamentally superior to both of them. Furthermore, the Khalid is now just a better chieftain 900 that you pay for. This change will subjugate these two vehicles into pure mediocrity.
Know you’re not a particular arcade player but any comment on GR7 being stuck at 13.0 for air arcade or now potentially the F15A’s being only 0.3 above the GR4 in ARB?
i did to my primary post on the thread. pretty easy to find
It never had 4x magic 2s or mica-em irl, so the only thing that makes sense is moving it down.
I agree
Spoiler
Yeah it’s a F-14A with f14D tech plus it most likely gonna be another 5 -10 years till we get another F-14 once the f14D gets added
Vehicles: Gepard 1A2, ZSU-23-4M4, PGZ04A
Gamemode: Ground RB
BR Change: +0.3 (1 step)
Reason: Probably unpopular opinion, but gun+missile (and radar) systems are too strong. They have the ability to use guns to fight other ground vehicles, low flying planes and at longer distances using missiles. It’s weird that some of them are at the same br as for example Type 93, which only contribution to the battle is usually hiding and praying that there are any targets to engage.
its astounding that the kurnass 2k is the same BR as planes like the f-18 or even the f-16A it seems that someone involved in balancing feels the python 3 is similar in capability to an IRCCM for some reason and planes with it are treated accordingly.
MiG-29G and soviet Su-27 should not be in the Gen 3.5 with Fox-3s bracket, they should be at 13.0/13.3
can u make one abbout mig 9 early? I should be same br as the late
Best ARH-less MiG-29 and actually solid 4th gen fighter.
Meh. The list is quite based.
MiG-29G should not be at the same rating as Su-27/33
Anyone who thinks they’re equal needs to get their brain functions re-evaluated
3 Likes
F104S TAF
Air RB
11.3 → 10.7 as long as the MiG-25PD sits at 11.0.
If the MiG-25 PD is moved up, 11.0 is acceptable for the TAF.
Its an interceptor aircraft that can’t intercept anymore because the MiG-25 PD, while being at a lower br, outranges it and even worse, the TAF’s RWR does not warn against the MiG-25 PD’s lock and launch.
Mirage 2000D-R1 Air RB 12.3 → 12.0 logical step down from the M2K CS4 and RMV
2 Likes