its my evidence of sealclubbing
now do somn with th evidence and make a suggestion regarding a spesific vehicle
Humor me, compare the advantages/disadvantages of J-10C compared to mechanical Eurofighter, F-15C GE, and Gripen E
Why would F-15E ever have a reason to go up
Chieftains series don’t deserve a raise in BR, they are not that good if they stand on their own compare to other vehicles on the new BR. Please consider. Don’t turn UK ground into another France ground force with many over BR vehicles and making no one play it except good players. Make it enjoyable for most of the players. Your data is correct but not enough type of data to increase Chieftains BR
2 Likes
Holding W doesn’t work… Now what? Lol
1 Like
This
also you can 1 shot it with 20mm if you angle only 1° through the armor hole in the tracks.
Ammo cookoff just is also happening with 1x hit of a bmp or an autocanon in general!
Weight reduction just is something that makes sense - like how is this turret as heavy as the Merkava 4 turrets??? WITHOUT the better engine?
The Namers are nearly unplayable unless you play big wide maps or have stupid player vs you
Don’t give a damn. Nerf it or decompress.
In all seriousness though, I think many people would agree that a slightly weaker vehicle is preferable to an overpowered one, at least for the sake of balance as a whole.
1 Like
TKX(P) shouldn’t be 12.0, it should probably go down to 11.7 with the type90s. the tkxp has jm33 (dm33 equivalent 481mm of pen (same as type90) compared to clickbaits with m829a2 with 628mm with tkxp having 1s faster reload. tkxp compared to type90 has 1 thing better which is optics/thermals, the type90 has better mobility, and bigger ready rack. the tkxp mobility due to gaijin not modeling the transmission correctly also suffers from bad acceleration aka slower than other mbt eventho its like 10 to 20 tons lighter.
in turn it has very good armor, a great 6s reload autoloader now, and is decently fast in forward movement, while having an extremely strong lineup to back it, no other nation has such a strong 10.3 lineup. the thing deserves to be 10.7
what tank
gepard has a limit on the APDS belt, you can maximally take 40 rounds APDS that are ALL in one concentrated belt, not one APDS every 5 rounds
Sure, it has good armor and a fast autoloader, but with only 4 km/h reverse, no thermal sight, slow turret rotation, poor gun depression, and mediocre mobility, any competent player can hit the gun and turn T-80UD gameplay into a repair simulator.
T-80B exists too
The J-10C is fine for 14.3. (It bring lower than the Super Hornet is a bit of a joke though, same goes for the Gripen E)
Now my real question is how the hell did you get a performance like that in your J-10C? Like that is impressive even for stock standards.
Vehicle : T-64B
Gamemode: Ground RB
BR Change 10.3 → 10.0
Reasoning: IMO 10.0 is pretty alright for the T-64B, considering it just got moved to 10.0.
Furthermore, it seem a bit questionable that the T-64B will be on the same BR as the T-80UD, a objectively better Tank.
(Yes i am aware that the UD should be 10.7. Im just putting this here that noone can call me an idiot for “thinking” the UD is alr at 10.3.)
I like that “slightly weaker” is considered balanced - for experienced players, that basically turns these tanks into a piece of firewood. About decompression, I agree - it’s probably the best approach, and not just for these tanks. The whole game could really use massive decompression.
So reasonable Br for R2Y2 when?
5 Likes
wow, that is impressive
Gaijin ignores multiple vehicle suggestion posts.