Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

Reminder that they moved T-55AM-1 up to 9.0 without that buff, so there’s that.
Imagine a theoretical scenario where Turm III gets, lets say, DM23 dart and moved up to 9.0.

At that moment it’d share the same BR as the former while being better in practically every metric possible that isn’t armor (and mostly against autocannons as well). I don’t think that’s fair which is why I believe it should move up to 9.0 with APDS.

Because it’s basically not on the level of any Eurofighter. The upgrade over J-10A is pretty solid, but just not enough to make it the equal of the 14.3 planes.

I don’t disagree on your assessment of the F-15’s, they should stay at 13.0 or lose their AIM-9M’s. If this is needed it should be looked at after the 14.7 BR change runs for a bit.

Based

5 Likes

Well let’s take the A-10 Late as an example again.
It gets 6x Maverick Ds.
You can launch them at 10/9km but most of them would get intercepted or miss if it goes for the Tungy (if the Tungy plays smart and hides behind buildings).

If the A-10 decides to climb to prevent enemies from hiding behind hills / buildings and get closer to the battlefield to reduce the amount of time the Mavericks are in the air, then it probably won’t be able to kinematically dodge the Tunguska’s missiles.

The ammo box takes 10 seconds to build.
Then it takes however long to replish the ammo.
I’d say maybe 20 seconds at most.
I really doubt a plane (especially the A-10) can just get back to base, rearm, and take off, and start acquiring targets within that time, unless you’re talking about a second aircraft spawning in or multiple engaging at the same time.
In that case, you’re in a 1v2 or 1v3 etc and of course you are going to struggle.

Most of which won’t be focusing on random aircraft swooping in out of nowhere and start strafing at the back of their spawn.

Of which apparently said 10.7 autocannon vehicles aren’t anything to be worried about.
Keep in mind the 2S38’s 57mm carries a lot more range than 40mm Bofors from either the Strfs or M247, and especially compared to 30mm AHEAD.

The OSA’s missiles are much slower than the Tunguska’s:
580m/s compared to 910m/s.
Even if the OSA’s missiles control better at range, they aren’t going to get to the jet before it would already escape.
It won’t kill it more so than just harass it.
At that point I’d rather have the Tunguska anyways.

I guess you’re right about it being tedious against mutliple targets.
Those drones should die fairly easily by the Tunguska’s 30mms or AAMs, though.

One set of nation mains being trash so bad even raccoons wouldn’t sniff them doesn’t mean you should punish everyone else for not sucking

same vehicle, same BR

no.

Get filtered

2 Likes

Well, I wouldn’t be opposed to it getting that buff and staying at 9.0.

If it got DM23 then it would definitely be 9.3 at the very least 😅
Probably 9.7 but maybe not.

DM23 is whole lot better than its APDS.

Everything about the Turm III is better than the T-55AM-1 besides the fact that it’s effectively a light tank with no armour other than against 50.Cals, and doesn’t get LRF nor smoke grenades.

Please consider lowering the F-104 ASA’s BR in Air RB. I get it, the players that play it are above average so the stats for the plane seem like a BR change is unneeded, but please, reconsider the fact it is at a higher BR as the MiG-23ML/MLD, same BR as the PD F-4s and only has an MTI radar and cannot bring a gun with its radar missile loadout. The plane itself isn’t comparable to most, if not all of its contemporaries and is only carried by the above average skill gap of its users. Please stop penalizing us, there has been multiple BR changes in the past where it was heavily suggested.

3 Likes

Don’t you mean apfsds?
It’s Armor-Piercing Fin-stabilized Discarding sabot innit?

If the Cheiftain MK.10 is going up to 9.3, it should recieve its correct engine horsepower of 850ps, which has already been reported but is yet to be changed.

Some militaries do use the APDS-FS abbreviation instead of APFSDS

it could also be refited with the TOGs thermals

1 Like

It can be both

Honestly, reading these suggestions makes me realise why gaijin doesnt listen to us

1 Like

That would be the Cheiftain Mk.11, which we should really have ingame

this one wasnt a MK.11 but was a fit check using the IR lamp fittings
this is what the MK.11 looks like:
image

1 Like

That’s why it would be so great if Gaijin had common sense, they wouldn’t need us to tell them what we need.
But they don’t, as you can see

ah ok, that would be cool to see but i dont see them changing the entire model for it unfortunately

Alright then

they wouldn’t need to as ingame the IR lamp never opens, it could just stay closed but give the tank thermals