After suggesting a 76mm gun should be at 9.3 you dont really have room to comment on logic
2 Likes
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Tiger 2 P (Swedish one included)
BR change: 6.7 to 6.3.
Reasons: Weaker than H version but with the same BR. Is a nosense put both in the same BR.
2 Likes
When UD at 10.7 meeting his Chinese brother UD: hey I can see better than you bro you just an inferior version of me
2 Likes
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: M26 pershing (Italian and French variants included)
BR change: 6.7 to 6.3.
Reasons: Weaker than most of the other 6.7. Most of the 5.3 tank can easily deal the M26 a BR change is needed.
3 Likes
Oh im just following Morgan’s trend of logical fallacies because he can’t watch his flank
Dies to anything with an 88mm or bigger.
So no. It should stay 6.7
Yeah my buddy and I are puzzled why the T-64B keeps getting the hammer. It’s gonna be useless at 10.3
BS argument. His armor is very good his movility too plus very good gun capable of firing APHE, APDS nad HEATFS. Basically much better than any other 6.7 TD. Is undertiered as hell.
And you dont agree because youa re russian fanboy thats all.
The Gripens A/C were grouped, but the Hornets (F-18C/F-18C MLU2) were not, why? although there are much more differences between A and Gripen than hornets (the difference between hornets is that MLU2 has bombs, HMD)
4 Likes
Folder the 2 finish/swedish F-18c’s. Since a large amount of other vehicles are being foldered at top tier this one has little reason to not be foldered aswell when they are the same br as each other. Espescially since both the American and British 14.0 F-18s are being pulled in front of lower br planes so the can be foldered
2 Likes
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: M18 Hellcat.
BR Change: 6.0 to 6.3 (And chage from ligh tank to Tank destroyer)
Reasons: Very powerfull TD. Excellent movility with practically no match in any of the other nations.
Ferdinand is slower, better armored, armed, and reloads quickly, while being able to take a hit.
L argument on your part.
Su-122-54 has decent mobility. It’s heat and apds do little damage, and the reload is really long
(GRB) AH-64DJP 11.7 > 11.3 — Compared to other helicopters 11.7 (AH-64A, AH-64D [Netherlands], AHS, Mi-35P, Ka-50[11.3]) it is inferior in almost all means of warnings and countermeasures. The 64DJP does not have LWS, IRCM and MAWs (AH-64D [Netherlands], Ka-50 and Mi-35P). I believe that the lack of important warning stations and countermeasures makes it the worst helicopter among those that I cited as an example and should go to 11.3.
1 Like
Well, that’s the developers’ fault for giving different bullets terrible penetration modifiers. The 100mm 3BM25 should have the same 60° penetration modifier as the 125mm 3BM22, meaning this 100mm bullet would have a 60° penetration similar to the APDS M728 or even better. In fact, the 115mm 3BM21 has the same problem at 60°.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1764vrf/incorrect_performance_of_3bm21_and_3bm25/
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Panther F
BR Change: 6.0 to 5.7
Reasons: Worst and weaker turret with slow rotation aswell, There is no reason put the 3 Panther is the same BR when the are not perfroming with equal result and with this Germany finally obtain some movility and variation in 5.7 a BR entire composed by heavies and TD.
My brain is checking out. Insomnia is gone, narcolepsy is coming in.
Also, they group Kurnass 2000 with Baz instead of Baz and Baz 13.7 lol
And strange they group F-5TH and F-16A OCU instead of leave it there as it is and make the RTAF F-16A ADF group with F-16A OCU then rework the OCU to be the same as Netz then add F-16AM eMLU wtf.
Russian bias is over?
Me with my 10.7 su25bm lineup:
No buddy we are just getting started
1 Like
Rangefinder and 6.7s reload as opposed to the standard 7.4s reload.
It’s better for long-range maps than the other Panther Variants.
1 Like
I’ve had one survive one of the guided missles from the Orion drone… american bias