Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Nashorn Tank Destroyer.
BR Change: 5.3 to 5.0
Reasons: Yes, a very capable gun but thats is all good. Movility is mediocre, very poor armor and suvivability, lack of a turret even his machineguns are very limited and in the most of the cases are useless.
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Panzer IV H.
BR Change: 3.7 to 4.0 and move to Rank III.
Reasons: Simple, is very good for 2.7 tanks. and is more needed in rank 3 so whit this changes all wins.
I abused mine by entering lucid dream, do whatever I want in a world I created. But I’ve lose that abilities bro it’s been years.
I also can’t sleep when I sense illogical fallacies coming from morvran
Oh lol he even reported it.
you cannot remove the gepard apds. Going to 8.7 would work if the 30s DCA goes to 8.3
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: SU-122-54.
BR Change: 6.7 to 7.0
Reasons: Very powerfull TD. Excellent movility, armor and firepower capable of firing HEATFS and APDS. Is ridiculous 5.7 tanks like Shermans or Tiger 1 face something like this.
After suggesting a 76mm gun should be at 9.3 you dont really have room to comment on logic
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: Tiger 2 P (Swedish one included)
BR change: 6.7 to 6.3.
Reasons: Weaker than H version but with the same BR. Is a nosense put both in the same BR.
When UD at 10.7 meeting his Chinese brother UD: hey I can see better than you bro you just an inferior version of me
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: M26 pershing (Italian and French variants included)
BR change: 6.7 to 6.3.
Reasons: Weaker than most of the other 6.7. Most of the 5.3 tank can easily deal the M26 a BR change is needed.
Oh im just following Morgan’s trend of logical fallacies because he can’t watch his flank
Dies to anything with an 88mm or bigger.
So no. It should stay 6.7
Yeah my buddy and I are puzzled why the T-64B keeps getting the hammer. It’s gonna be useless at 10.3
BS argument. His armor is very good his movility too plus very good gun capable of firing APHE, APDS nad HEATFS. Basically much better than any other 6.7 TD. Is undertiered as hell.
And you dont agree because youa re russian fanboy thats all.
The Gripens A/C were grouped, but the Hornets (F-18C/F-18C MLU2) were not, why? although there are much more differences between A and Gripen than hornets (the difference between hornets is that MLU2 has bombs, HMD)
Folder the 2 finish/swedish F-18c’s. Since a large amount of other vehicles are being foldered at top tier this one has little reason to not be foldered aswell when they are the same br as each other. Espescially since both the American and British 14.0 F-18s are being pulled in front of lower br planes so the can be foldered
Mode: GRB
Vehicle: M18 Hellcat.
BR Change: 6.0 to 6.3 (And chage from ligh tank to Tank destroyer)
Reasons: Very powerfull TD. Excellent movility with practically no match in any of the other nations.
Ferdinand is slower, better armored, armed, and reloads quickly, while being able to take a hit.
L argument on your part.
Su-122-54 has decent mobility. It’s heat and apds do little damage, and the reload is really long
(GRB) AH-64DJP 11.7 > 11.3 — Compared to other helicopters 11.7 (AH-64A, AH-64D [Netherlands], AHS, Mi-35P, Ka-50[11.3]) it is inferior in almost all means of warnings and countermeasures. The 64DJP does not have LWS, IRCM and MAWs (AH-64D [Netherlands], Ka-50 and Mi-35P). I believe that the lack of important warning stations and countermeasures makes it the worst helicopter among those that I cited as an example and should go to 11.3.
