It’s vastly better than the Aubl 74 HVG. Oh speaking of which…
Ground battles: GAB GRB GSB
VEHICLE: Aubl-74 HVG 8.0 → 8.0
Buff the reload to 4.25 secs or 4.5 seconds for first stage and 5.0 seconds after words. This thing is a total dumpster fire. It’s loud, isn’t survivable in the slightest, is slow, and terrible gun depression somehow (also gets worse with the drivers hatch), and only has 250mm pen. Which is lower than other tanks at that br.
Just make it usable, I don’t like my balls in a vice when playing Italy
Reasons: Basically is a better German M48A2 but with lower BR. So is a nosense a tank with acces to reactive armor had a lower BR than exactly the same tank without this extra armor.
Reasons: Yes, a very capable gun but thats is all good. Movility is mediocre, very poor armor and suvivability, lack of a turret even his machineguns are very limited and in the most of the cases are useless.
Reasons: Very powerfull TD. Excellent movility, armor and firepower capable of firing HEATFS and APDS. Is ridiculous 5.7 tanks like Shermans or Tiger 1 face something like this.
BS argument. His armor is very good his movility too plus very good gun capable of firing APHE, APDS nad HEATFS. Basically much better than any other 6.7 TD. Is undertiered as hell.
And you dont agree because youa re russian fanboy thats all.
The Gripens A/C were grouped, but the Hornets (F-18C/F-18C MLU2) were not, why? although there are much more differences between A and Gripen than hornets (the difference between hornets is that MLU2 has bombs, HMD)
Folder the 2 finish/swedish F-18c’s. Since a large amount of other vehicles are being foldered at top tier this one has little reason to not be foldered aswell when they are the same br as each other. Espescially since both the American and British 14.0 F-18s are being pulled in front of lower br planes so the can be foldered
