I’d have to disagree with you on this one. I have it and it really isn’t as good as it seems
one thing that should be changed in this regard (and this applies for all manual loader tanks) is making the base reload faster even if the maxed reload speed stays the same, if it’s frustrating with a max/expert crew imagine a new player with only a few points in reload, it starts at a base reload of 27 seconds.
That could be a good way to make it less annoying to play without affecting the balance.
Now they get to face the T80UD. Absolutely fantastic, W move gaijin
1 Like
im for that. Crew skills make performance variation too extreme.
My level 130+ crewslots will always beat a new players level 30 and its by far too much to be fair at all.
Its also taken me almost 4 years of mostly playing one nation to get to that point. Its stupid
im fine for things to be better from grinding towards it but not by such a major edge
3 Likes
honestly crew training especially in reload is such a dumb concept. Notably at top tier you need to spend millions of SL to get a 6.3s reload on most NATO tanks, or 5.3 on the abrams, while russia and japan get a 6s and 4s reload right out of the box, or like you said at lower BRs where the IS-2 needs to wait almost half a minute, while an experienced player with much more skill can shave a good 7s off that just because…hes been here longer? The whole crew system needs to be reworked imo, because its just not fair
2 Likes
Air Realistic:
Mirage 2000C-S5: 12.7 → 12.3
The new proposed BR change for the F-15A is very problematic for multitude of vehicles including the Mirage 2000C-S5.
-
The Mirage 2000C-S5 lacks an MPRF mode like the F-15A which would provide stronger tracking for SARH missiles.
-
The F-15A has twice the amount of SARH missiles as the Mirage 2000C-S5
-
The F-15A has better flight model than the Mirage 2000C-S5
-
The F-15A has twice the amount of IR missiles as the Mirage 2000C-S5.
As it stands, it cannot be the same battle-rating as the F-15A.
8 Likes
Why are you talking about the IS-2 and not the 1944?
reloads arent even the worst bit.
Repair times are insane for low level crews.
a friend of mine plays not ver often, his repair times are double mine for the same damage.
I win repair races 70% of the time from this variation and its not fair at all
2 Likes
1944 has significantly better armor and a DSHK, which i think a well armored tank with the best MG in game, a point and click boom stick, and pretty fair mobility isnt a bad deal
1 Like
Not exactly BR but the changes to the Chinese air tree should be heavily reconsidered. The J-11 families has limited CAS abilities and are intended for air superiority roles. The Chinese air tree should therefore be expanded into five branches with a domestic heavy fighter branch, and the J-7/J-10A+C seperated as the new branch, where the F-16A/M2C were rebranded into TW+PK with future subtrees(this also allows for players to skip the branch if they only wanted to experience indegnious designs)
2 Likes
Air Realistic:
Mirage 2000D-RMV: 12.7 → 12.3
The new proposed BR change for the F-15A is very problematic for multitude of vehicles including the Mirage 2000D-RMV.
- The Mirage 2000D-RMV lacks an appropriate fighter radar.
- The F-15A has SARH missiles which the Mirage 2000D-RMV lacks
- The F-15A has an internal gun while the Mirage 2000D-RMV would require a gunpod that would come at the sacrifice of some flight performance.
- The F-15A has better flight model than the Mirage 2000D-RMV
- The F-15A has 2x the amount of IR missiles as the Mirage 2000D-RMV
As it stands, it cannot be the same battle-rating as the F-15A.
6 Likes
F-4F EARLY 10.7 → 10.0 - 10.3
Me 163 B 8.0 → 7.7
Me 163 B-0 / KI-200 8.3 → 7.7
Still don no why Me 163s are in 8.0-8.3
3 Likes
Vehicle: A-7K
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: Already planned for 11.0 but should be 10.7
Reason being its 11.3 RN but even at 11.0 like its planned its going to still vs 12.0 prem BR spam with 2 9Ls and sub mach and terrible FM. Also the A-10A is 10.7 ARB and gets better gun, 4 9Ls, better FM just not speed. Also would like to add the A-7E is going 10.7 to 10.3 with about same speed and FM but worse mavericks and 2 9G at best.
1 Like
We desperately need 15.0 for Air Battles.
REASON
• Relieve compression for lower BRs to allow for more expansion, for more BR compression changes
-Example:
*Rafale C/M, SU30SM2, Eurofighter AESA, should at 15.0
(they are arguably the most competitive, capable, and down right out preform ever other plane in its bracket)
With the current 14.0’s and 14.3’s moving up 14.3 and 14.7 respectively*
with the exception of
Finnish F18C
*Does not have HMS or AIM120 C5
*Folder with other Finnish F/A-18 C Hornet
Other Air BR Considerations
13.3-13.7 planes moved up to 13.7-14.0 respectively
Current 13.3’s that should be 13.7:
SU 30MK2 AMV
SU 30 MKM
REASON
•These have the biggest missile pay load at its current BR with the addition of HMS out preforming all other 13.3’s and have more countermeasures to effectively defend itself.
***Very oppressive in a current 12.3-13.3 matchmaker
Current 13.7’s that should be 14.0:
F15C MSIP II
SU27SM
F2A
J11B
BAZ Meshupar
REASON
•With the following changes, this would account for other compression changes and decompress the current 12.7-13.7 matchmaker as these massively out perform the current 12.7’s
3 Likes
The ammo belt on the DSHK is rather small and does no damage / lights almost no fires compared to the USA .50 cal.
It’s armor…? It can die to getting hit in the commander hatch by a 3.7 frontally and it has weak points on the front of the turret as thin as 73mms
It’s pen isn’t all that great either
They will ignore posts with multiple vehicle suggestions. Only one single vehicle suggestion allowed per post.
PT-16/T14 Mod. was moved up last BR rating changes and still hasn’t had interior composite added/modeled (Even though it’s accepted as a suggestion 2 years ago Community Bug Reporting System) or given DM33.
Nothing burger BR changes except for Falcon finally being put down.
1 Like
I think the AMX-30 DCA should go to 8.0 if it loses its APDS. Sure, it has a radar, but so does the SU-37-2, and it has a stabiliser and better AP shells for 7.7, at the cost of its depression. The AMX-30 DCA isn’t stabilised and its protection is rather thin too. Its APDS were what made it worth playing at 8.7 (at least to have AT capabilities that don’t require constant flanking)
4 Likes
Gaijin forgot about the existence of the F-16AJ🤣🤣🤣
Why are the F-16AJ being held at 12.7?
3 Likes
I completely agree with the F-4F Early as i made a post eay earlier. Since it bring 10.7 when J35XS and other things have more or better or having 9Js and CMs at or lower BR is sad. 10.7 no CMs and vs 11.7 prem mig-23 and what not spam and 4 9Js is just sad when J35XS gets 6 missiles, fast at alt, can 1v1 dog fight most things and win + 12 large CMs to 1 pop any IR ar 10.3.
1 Like