No? The F-15C GE is fine at 14.3, it is the Super Hornet that needs to drop down to 14.3 from 14.7
1 Like
super hornet gets what like two more AMRAAMs on a more bloated airframe, nonsensical to be more than 0.3 higher
Agreed, it should drop down to 14.3, but this guy is asking for the F-15C GE to drop down to 14.0 for whatever reason.
Wow a minor nation doing better than a major nation.
Your argument is disingenuous, and morvran you despise any balancing for bad Soviet tanks.
Name 1 thing the Russian tank does better than its counterparts.
Reverse. That’s literally it.
The rest of them have better reloads, armor, ammo / penetration, gun depression.
These vehicles should be looked at for a BR increase in simulator BR:
P-47D-30 (Italy)
P-47D-30 (China)
These are insanely powerful to the point of dominating the entire 2.7-4.7 brackets they face and should go up from 3.7 to 4.7 to make them consistent with the less powerful P-47D-28 (US). Nothing at their current 3.7 simulator BR can compete with them at all to the point they just sealclub the match with sometimes as many as 18 player kills without a single death
no no, I despise bad balancing of soviet tanks, and despise when major nation mains cant handle that a nation of players with a K/D closer to 1 than 0.6 is a better indication of when a vehicle is ok. Dont appreciate bad mouthing of a friend of mine either.
most open goal of the decade
BMPT
The average player is NOT good at being an example of how vehicles should be balanced
minor nation players are usually closer to what BARE MINIMUM for what a mid player is in K/D ratio for all other shooters. they are naturally are a better data pool to listen to, balance out the slop players with the competent ones and you find the IS2 is just fine as is
4 Likes
This what they should do about change BR.
1 Like
It isn’t bad mouthing when morvran is a known liar? And he is very biased.
Your opinion is also irrelevant you had only played German / Brit rank 4
And if we compare two of the same tank from Germany and Sweden wow. Look at that, Sweden is magically better despite having the worse tank.
I would point out that the 2 Russian IS-2 you link the stats for are and old premium that is longer available and an old event reward, thus now being played much by newer player the 2 combined have 4.5 million games last month while the TT IS-2 (1944) that is still available has TEN times that at 49 million games and a far lower K/D at 1.09, not horrible, but not standout either.
1 Like
not half compared to you
ok Germany and USSR are my second and third nations that i dont play much of. but i still play them
event vehicle. naturally superior players.
apples to apples is tech tree
2 Likes
Kills per Spawn:
- IRIS-T SLM: 1.50
- SAMP/T: 1.10
- Buk-M3: 0.88
Kills per Death:
- IRIS-T SLM: 1.91
- SAMP/T: 1.41
- Buk-M3: 0.77
While it may suck at intercepting munitions, it is the best in terms of netting kills and shoot down aircraft out of all top tier SAMs.
Im using december 2025 stats to try and use as fair recent data as possible.
china TT 1944 and USSR TT 1944 are the best comparison but other IS2 options are all else i have to make this russia main stop putting his fingers in his ears when told that a russian tank is balanced well.
a K/D of 1 is sadly good in this game. only the top 500 tanks for K/D actually have above a 1K/D. thats not even half. can check for yourself on statshark, if you remove event vehicles the situation is even more dire
1 Like
Vehicle: Ru251
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 7.3 —> 7.0
Reason: too long reloading time to fire heatfs.
Lmao I’m the biased one… when I’ve played more than 2 nations. I have top tier in 4 nations? 5? But surely I am the biased one.
I’m still waiting to hear what makes the IS-2 better than the other heavies.
wow! 0.1 K/D difference between us!!! im so clearly a noob in your presence despite being a far newer player. Whatever shall I do?!?!
Its quite clear that overall we are on par players on paper so youre proving nothing.
well done youve had 4 years more to do more nations while playing russia as your primary than i have.
im not. im claiming its BALANCED
please untie your panties over this.
2 Likes
Fair enough, the Chinese IS-2 (1944) is probably the best for representing it’s actual performance as it’s a still available TT vehicle and China doesn’t have the “major nation” syndrome that USA, USSR and Germany get.
That said the IS-2s reload, even max- experted is frustrating, when you switch from the IS-2 to the Tiger 2 it feels like you are using an autocannon.
1 Like
0.91 vs a 1.22?
Or 1.16 vs 1.49?
Good thing Russia isn’t my best nation! (Proving my point once more!)
Lmao you can’t say it, because you know it isn’t balanced. It’s a bad tank for its br. Buffing its reload makes it balanced
I do think you need to take minor nation stats with a grain of salt of course. but generally they are better at showing where vehicles should be.
Only issue is that they are facing the major nation noobs so naturally get statpadded.
reduce that reload and it gets moved higher up. I dont think any of us want the IS2 matchmaking to be korean war larp facing mk3 centurions day to day.
1 Like
Should we take it with a grain of salt? You always say Brit’s are better than every other player. Yet, me, a Russian main has a better KDr in the Fox, and that was post its first set of nerfs that I got it. Or second? I can’t remember when the turret traverse and the engine was changed. That’s when I got it.
Also, you just proved your own argument invalid. “ major nation noobs so naturally get statpadded” so those “major nation noobs” that are facing clearly better vehicles are doing that good with a and tank (IS-2) jeez I guesss Russian players are really good