2s38 move to 10.7 finally, lwk the “2s38 OP” died a long time ago but this is fine
also im suprise the 13.0 Eagle got move down, ig it make sense since they only have aim-7m
2s38 op died bc they added the terminator
yes but making it bigger isnt going to solve much
fr bmpt is just the new “2s38 op”
its going to patch another gap so
If the fa-18a and c late, why and cant they folder the su30sm and sm2?
yeah except the bmpt is actually op unlike the derivatsiya
I am opposed to removing APDS from the AMX-30 DCA.
This vehicle lacks a stabilizer and also has low mobility due to its low power-to-weight ratio; instead, it was balanced by having high combat capability through the use of APDS.
Compared to the Falcon, which occupies a similar role, it is inferior in three aspects—stabilization, mobility, and concealment—while being superior in that it is equipped with radar.
I believe the options should be to lower its BR, apply other adjustments to give it an upper hand, or simply retain the APDS.
At the very least, if APDS is to be removed (the same applies to the Falcon), its BR should be lowered.
7 Likes
germidy is literally one of the best tt’s across the board
plz gaijin i beg
And before the 2s38 it was the BMP-2M…
Mommy russia will always have you covered comrade.
Chieftain 900 has no business being at the same BR as the Khalid, when the Khalid is blatantly better. Same for the Chieftain mk. 10. if they go up to 9.3 they better get L23a1 or the 5 second reload that the challengers get.
Falcon either goes down to 7.3/7.7 if it get’s it’s APDS removed. And the amx-30 S DCA goes down to 7.7.
Ajax needs to go down to 9.7, same BR as the STRF 9040B. As they are pretty much equal in firepower and mobility.
T58 needs to be moved up to 9.0. This thing is rediculously good.
Haven’t really got anything else to say other than the bmpt’s still needing to be moved up even higher.
2 Likes
lets be real that thing is still very good outside of the chassis its mounted on
dude who hates Falcon and DCA right now:
if it was the btr90 variant id cry
Thought you were joking with many of those changes.
Moving Panther and Tiger I? WTF?
It is, but at least its not outrageous OP
I think that in the aerial simulation, the Buccaneer S.1 should drop to 8.3 in the ranking. At 9.0 without a cannon and without missiles, it’s just a flying sardine can.
1 Like
gaijin please never add this below 11.3
Suggestion:
Remove planned foldering
F-15J(M) w/ F-15J
Reason:
So, this is gonna be a bit of a messy reason, but. Basically, firstly, them being foldered is probably a pre-emptive change to prepare for the addition of future aircraft in the line. But I think that it actually creates more issues down the road then it would solve to do now, and will likely need to be undone in the future if it is.
Basically, there are still a lot of peace eagles which could be added to the game, notably a proper early model lot C-4, which could be foldered with the current F-15J, and a lot C-8+ J-MSIP Type II with IEWS. As such, I believe it is better to leave the current vehicles unfoldered, as each of them has a much closer vehicle they could be foldered with in the future if they were to be added.
Additionally, once more modern armaments are added, the F-15J(M) will almost deffinitely go up to rank IX. As such them staying unfoldered makes this more convenient.
Really I just see no reason to folder a vehicle that will just have to be unfoldered later.
3 Likes