plz gaijin i beg
And before the 2s38 it was the BMP-2M…
Mommy russia will always have you covered comrade.
Chieftain 900 has no business being at the same BR as the Khalid, when the Khalid is blatantly better. Same for the Chieftain mk. 10. if they go up to 9.3 they better get L23a1 or the 5 second reload that the challengers get.
Falcon either goes down to 7.3/7.7 if it get’s it’s APDS removed. And the amx-30 S DCA goes down to 7.7.
Ajax needs to go down to 9.7, same BR as the STRF 9040B. As they are pretty much equal in firepower and mobility.
T58 needs to be moved up to 9.0. This thing is rediculously good.
Haven’t really got anything else to say other than the bmpt’s still needing to be moved up even higher.
2 Likes
lets be real that thing is still very good outside of the chassis its mounted on
dude who hates Falcon and DCA right now:
if it was the btr90 variant id cry
Thought you were joking with many of those changes.
Moving Panther and Tiger I? WTF?
It is, but at least its not outrageous OP
I think that in the aerial simulation, the Buccaneer S.1 should drop to 8.3 in the ranking. At 9.0 without a cannon and without missiles, it’s just a flying sardine can.
1 Like
gaijin please never add this below 11.3
Suggestion:
Remove planned foldering
F-15J(M) w/ F-15J
Reason:
So, this is gonna be a bit of a messy reason, but. Basically, firstly, them being foldered is probably a pre-emptive change to prepare for the addition of future aircraft in the line. But I think that it actually creates more issues down the road then it would solve to do now, and will likely need to be undone in the future if it is.
Basically, there are still a lot of peace eagles which could be added to the game, notably a proper early model lot C-4, which could be foldered with the current F-15J, and a lot C-8+ J-MSIP Type II with IEWS. As such, I believe it is better to leave the current vehicles unfoldered, as each of them has a much closer vehicle they could be foldered with in the future if they were to be added.
Additionally, once more modern armaments are added, the F-15J(M) will almost deffinitely go up to rank IX. As such them staying unfoldered makes this more convenient.
Really I just see no reason to folder a vehicle that will just have to be unfoldered later.
1 Like
T-80UD should move from 10.3 to 10.7 or even 11.0.
Compared to T-72B and T-72B (1989) also currently at 10.3 it already had better armor, mobility and reload at the same BR, but now it got a reload buff a while ago too, making the gap even bigger. This tank is starting to become oppressive at it’s BR. Please do something about it.
Other than that, I agree with most of the proposed changes.
2 Likes
Statistics don’t lie. Most of the German lineups covering ww2 needs to be -0.3 BR.
Mode: Air Realistic
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D-R1
Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reasoning: It’s worse than the Mirage 2000C-S4/5 while being at the same BR. Lacking the Super 530D’s that the S4/5 get whilst also being worse in performance and relying on a gunpod which also tanks it’s performance.
3 Likes
statistics say german players have a skill issue because they have the most stacked tt in the game and somehow do bad
2 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D-RMV
Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Reasoning: It has only 2 x Magic 2 missiles and relies on a gunpod which already puts it behind a lot of 12.7 aircraft and even some 12.3 and 12.0. Most notably there is no reason for it to be the same BR as the F-15A which you are planning to put at 12.7.
2 Likes
Yeah, I understand how you feel, and I get your point.
That said, statistically there are AA vehicles with higher kill rates than the AMX-30, as well as some with roughly the same performance, so personally I find it a bit hard to judge.
I’m not saying that all external statistics are perfectly accurate, but among BR 8.x AA vehicles, the Falcon and the XM-246 stand out with overwhelmingly high kill rates (around 1.3x). They’re followed by the ZA-35 and the AMX-30 DCA (1.17), then the ItPsV (1.05), and then the rest.
The Falcon is definitely a problem. But in reality, the XM-246 and the ZA-35 are also
like cro
Spoiler
Yeah, pretty much, but its small, fast and fairly agile, you can terrain mask really easily.
With most supersonics at 9.7, there isnt much that can catch you in the Buc S2 at low alt and at high alt, with no bombs, nothing can catch you. You overspeed above 60% throttle unless at 20k ft, then you can hit around mach 0.97.
Buc S2B is kinda sad since loosing A2A radar, couple with the 9Ls, you could have some fun, but the Seagles are kinda fun to mess with instead. Will be interesting to see if any SEAD gameplay gets added for the AJ168s to be of some use.
1 Like
I mean, the APHE-I (SAP x3 + HEI x1) belt still exists.
They’ll struggle a lot more with cold war soviet stuff (I’m thinking of T-62s/T-55s), but blufor stuff will still be a couple APHE cupola hits away. :P