AIR SIMULATOR
J-8B 11.7 → 10.7
Overall a worse F-4E. Worse RWR (SPO-10, same as MiG-21MF for example), half as many radar missiles, and taking them means you’re also limited to only two IR MSLs.
1 Like
Chieftain Marskman
Ground Realistic
8.3 → 9.0
Same as all the other Gepardy vehicles. Been over performing far too much for far too long.
3 Likes
AAM-3 vs 11.7’s :p
2 Likes
Chieftain Mk.10
RB 9.0 → 9.3
If you’re gonna move it up at least give it the 900’s volumetric hull armour.
Even then, the Sherman II is still weaker than welded hull Shermans.
All the cast hull Shermans need their armor models fixed, though.
ALL APHE with High Mass to Explosive mass Ratio
(35mm KDA, 30mm HSS 831L, RARDEN, other APHE slinging autocannons)
Add Shell Shatter Mechanic as they have done with APCR/APDS
9 Likes
The difference between the M4A1 and Sherman II is bigger than the difference between the Sherman II and the M4/M4A4
su33/27 should go 13.0 and the premium 13.7
2 Likes
and it shouldnt happen, why the hell are they not moving other planes UP?
Yeah… We are actually going to end up with F18s at 12.0 before long
Vehicle: T-80UD
Gamemode: Ground realistic
BR Change: 10.3 —> 10.7
Reason: T-80UD has been very powerful since it was added. A much stronger version of any of the T-72Bs at the same BR. Has access to the same powerful rounds, but with the armour of the much high BR T-80U series of tanks. This makes it much more survivable than the 72Bs and 64B (which you want to move up as well). Putting it at 10.7 won’t do it any harm, it would actually be paired very nicely with the T-80B, 2S6, 2S38 etc.
13 Likes
So early F-15’s goes to 12.7 in Sim, but Su-27/J-11 remains at 13.3? And Su-30MK2/MKK still not at 13.7?
7 Likes
honestly wouldnt raise it until they raise the other 5.0s cause it has similiar armor to t1e1 90 and the M4A1 76 which are very good at there br
The T-64B sharing the same BR as the T-80UD is insane, also the 2S38 getting moved up to 10.7 despite the lackluster statistics? Since when do you not care about stats when it comes to balancing vechicles?
4 Likes
SB: F-15A, F-15J, Baz
From 13.0 to 12.7
Excuse me, but WHAT???
WHY?
How can you downtier the F-15 and NOT the Su-27/Su-33/J-11 which are arguably the equivalent aircraft!!! Leaving them at 13.3 WHAT???
Redfor will be flying MiG-29A 9-13 with 2xER and 2xR-60 and inferior avionics vs 4xAIM-7M + 2xAIM-9M with a MUCH better radar and RWR and countermeasure count???
It’s already bad enough that the F-18s are undertiered at that bracket in SB, now THIS?!?!?!
HOW IS THIS EQUAL/BALANCED?
HELLO? GAIJIN? HELLO?
EDIT: Just to make it clear, I HEAVILY SUGGEST that the Su-27/Su-33/J-11 match the BR of the F-15A/F-15J/Baz, whatever it may be.
It was already bad that the Flankers were overtiered at 13.3 while the F-15s sat at 13.0, but undertiering the F-15s AGAIN… this is ABSURD.
6 Likes
It won’t even be able to pen a Tiger 2H at anything that isn’t extremely close range
1 Like
AMX 30 S DCA , put two versions in the tree, one with APDS and the other without
3 Likes
really whats this huge difference then ?
Simply not good enough with 15s aced reload.
Others would have similar shells and reload twice as fast.
M109A1/Rochev
6.3 → 6.0
They have nothing over the 6.0 M109s (even worse due to no smoke from the G, and easier to shoot barrel)
They should be moved to parity
4 Likes