Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

image

The playerbase for the Type 61 is not equal for the premium vs tech tree. It’s also a far less attractive buy compared to other offers for Japan.

1 Like

yeah but those add on tracks make a world of difference for example the american 76 cant pen the corner at angles anymore its basically pay to win

1 Like

That’s why it’s meta for Squadron battles :)
Unless you have the KV-220…

1 Like

decent but the mains issue is sabre, mig 15 and early Skyhawk kicks them to death.

I like them a lot but youre very much trapped on the back foot unless your enemy has screwed up badly or just ended a dogfight and are slow

didnt claim 8.0 what on earth are you on bro

and it should be given the add on armor as its a thing the germans did too

1 Like

typo i meant 7.0

fr

The MiG-29G has R-73s.
Average Russian main behavior projecting, calling others as mains out of insecurities.

I can concede the RWR, but having a bad radar is absolutely a void argument if your SARH missiles carry IOG+DL

HMS-less, you have to point the entire nose or begin to touch ACM modes, pointing the plane’s nose anyway to lock an effectively worse SARH than the R-27ER.

Up to no one’s suprise, Russian mains glorifying the F-15A, one of the most overrated planes in the entire game and it’s not even close.

The T58 is one of those tanks that the only way you are winning against it is when it don’t know you’re there.
I would prefer a nerf to its turret rotation to about 15-20 degrees per second and a BR increase to 8.7.
Since Autoloaders affect French BRs and 1 single japanese tank so much, why not affect U.S tanks so much?

3 Likes

you do know the MIG 29G isnt the only mig 29 the 12.7 mig 29 9.12 only gets r60s

It’s a premium though, meaning lower tier players use it too.
The TT one is merely bad due to bad players, I loved spading those tanks, they were a breeze

Aircraft F4U-7
BR lowered to 5.7 in ARB
The F4U-4B is at 5.7 they are the same except the F4U-7 is slightly heavier

3 Likes

Leopard 1 should not be facing T 44 85s and M26s ,it is not a bad vehicle by any metric,its just powercreeped

yeah i think we need a hard cap between 8.0 and 8.3 as the advantage of stabs is to much

I'll quote you the table again:

image

As far as you could’ve checked before blurting out your reply, the suggestion table proposes R-73s to ANY MiG-29.

1 Like

Well yeah.
Remember when it was 7.3? That was crazy.
Now they swung it the other way.
Now it faces Obj 279 for some reason 😂

7.7 makes the most sense currently, at least to me.
Until they finally decompress 6.0-8.0.

no MiG-29 should sit at the same br as a flanker
that is completely moronic

1 Like

Yes I get that. But the German ones get smoke grenades and more add on armor, and the tiger West / ost pack is arguably even better while still having the commander hatch weak spot.

The heavy tank no.6, I’m unsure if you have it, but it has the stupid corner hull smoke launchers meaning you can’t effectively angle and look at someone -3 degrees from you.
It also has no additional armor or smoke grenades.

All for a commanders hatch that is rarely shot at in any of the tigers, unless you go against a jumbo who is a lv.100 and likes to kill tiger 24/7

assumed you too where discussing its current br placement in the br documents of the F15A being 12.7