Planned Battle Rating changes for the month of October

I would like to make some proposals for Israel.

The Merkava Mark.3 models should all be shifted down to 10.7 at the minimum. They are not equivalent to the other 11.0 tanks like the T-80UM2 and fall closer in performance to a 10.3 or 10.7 such as the T-90A. Please consider decreasing their BR.

3 Likes

Why ruin Italian 10.0 lineup by removing all 10.0 helis? At least leave the t129 at 10.0

1 Like

Because if you look at the t32 in America at 7.7 which is very weak, and if the tiger 2h exceeds the br 7.0, which in my opinion is the maximum for ww2 vehicles, it will become pointless, as the t32 will kill everyone, the heavy tank is there to be hard to beat, and not long ago I will remind you that gaijn lifted the 6.7-7.7 vehicles up so that the ww2 vehicles would not meet the leopard 1 for example, More like they picked up the br of WW2 vehicles on 7.7, then they would do something that the players asked for during the strike, and we went back to what was before it, and again the vehicles from WW2 around BR 6.7 were useless.

Now I’ve realized that the Tiger 1e will fight the is-3, it’s absurd lol

3 Likes

Leave T-69 II G at its br, it perfectly fit there. Also leave rest of chinese tanks.

Also why you are moving up Tiger I is terrible idea, it shouldnt fight against so many T-54 and IS-3, it has no chance.

Gajin why do you want destroy good changes from the summer? It is ridiculous.

3 Likes

It is unreasonable for the Type 89 and Type 87 RCV to be upgraded BR to 9.0. The problem of the Type 89 has been nerfed a total of 9 times and this upgrade of its BR makes the Type 89 almost difficult to use as the TOW is slow and has no tandem, its maneuverability is worse than some other IFVs in 9.0. The Type 87 RCV has no TVD, no STAB and no laser rangefinder, why do you guys think it’s a good idea to upgrade to 9.0?
I think you Gaijin really hate Japan because they already lack a lot of vehicles compared to other countries, especially air defense, but nerfing them constantly like this makes Japanese tech, which is already very hard to play and now even harder to play. I hope you guys give Japanese tech a better balance instead of nerfing them to the point where they are at the bottom of society.

9 Likes

You have no idea what you are talking about… Average forum user.

1 Like

Have you ever played anything with 90mm APCR? Literally zero self awareness.

Swingfire to 7.7 - or more everything else up.

This has no chance at its BR and neds scouting to actually have any use in game.

1 Like

Moving it to 8.0 was over kill

1 Like

69IIG 8.7 unchanged or T55AM/AMD 8.7→9.0

69IIG was immediately promoted to 9.0 after the Chinese National Day discount event, and it is unreasonable to engage in a battle with T72AV. This is a scam by Gaijin. If 69IIG is moved to 9.0, the T55AM/AMD that he is benchmarking against should also be moved to 9.0

ZTZ88A/B remains unchanged on 8.7 restores or 8.7→9.0 restore the performance of Type 268 composite armor

The ZTZ88 series is unable to combat any vehicle above 9.0 after being upgraded to 9.0, so it should either remain unchanged or restore its composite armor to its normal level

M60TTS(china) 9.0→8.7 ro give M774

Compared to the TTS in the United States, China’s TTS does not have explosive reactions or better steel needles, so it should either decrease to 8.7 or issue better APFSDS

Z9WA 10.3 restores ro 10.3→10.7and give 4xAKD-9

The 8-engine TY90 and 8-engine 200 speed, 750 breaking 4KM missiles are simply unable to engage in combat at the BR of 10.7

QN506 10.0→9.7ro9.3

The firepower of the QN506 is far inferior to that of the BMP2M, and its protection is not as good as that of the Cougar. Moreover, the ammunition on fire cannot be extinguished, and the CDD502 only has 4 rounds (where have the 4 spare rounds you promised in the DEV gone?). Its BR should have decreased

KF41 10.7→10.0

Same as QN506

KA-50 11.0→11.3

Improving the BR of KA-50 is something everyone wants to see

69IIA 8.3→8.0 or give APFDSD

Currently, the 69IIA in the game is just an upgraded version of the 59A, which is equivalent to a faster and grille equipped steering and high and low speed machine

Germany, Tiger, Leopard maintain at 5.7BR

Tiger and Leopard are unable to fight against vehicles of 7.0

IS-2(all)Maintain the current BR

Same as Germany

12 Likes

It really wasn’t. The T-54 and M60 had similarly useless armor while being way less mobile and being a higher BR.

Mobility isn’t overrated. It’s just that due to the lack of proper light/medium tanks in German mid tiers nobody learned how to use the mobility to its full potential. Most Panthers were basically pocket heavy tanks.

This has to be one of the worst takes in this thread.

2 Likes

Anyone who is saying that the KA series helis are worse than anything that fires hellfires is completely wrong.

Since the hellfire lofts its missiles the realistic range is more like 6km instead of the 8km on the statcard.
I find it laughable that gaijin think the AH64A and its equivalents are 11.3 worthy when the KA50 is 11.0.

If the ka50 is not brought up to 11.3 this shows clear bias towards a certain nation cough cough

3 Likes

It should add DTW2-100 or any new apfsds to balance it,8.0 is kind of useless.

2 Likes

Many good changes to WWII tanks. Soviets and Germans have long been by far the best choices for it. Things might finally start feeling balanced.

The big pay to win stompers still need to go up: KV-1E and KV-1B. Only vehicles with paper thin armor can reliably penetrate these in normal combat conditions. They still have pretty good guns and mobility as well.

Give merkawa 2d dm63 round

1 Like

Agree with everything here. The changes to ztz88a/b and type 69 II G 8.7 → 9.0 will make it unplayable. I don’t see how these are deserving of going up to 9.0.

2 Likes

I have entered the game and updated some new RB changes o7

Give us the Zerstörer 45 at 6.3 and put the Kugelblitz at 6.7 again

1 Like