in your subjective opinion that neither other people nor the developer of this game that has access to all match data on each tank agree with.
2 Likes
Your inability to judge tanks is not Gaijin’s fault.
So true
This is not a subjective opinion you can examine the qualities of the tank and compare them against its BR range the only feature it has which is different is its vertical stabilizer and this is featured on lower BR shermans
Gaijin’s strongest shill
1 Like
If you’re here to have a discussion then don’t waste further time with comments like this.
1 Like
I am humbly asking IDS Tornado Marineflieger to go down to 10.7 for air RB.
1 Like
its been up for war bonds , just grab it when its up next lol
Its still supposed to be based on the datas…
1 Like
I disagree with how you are oversimplifying it. But i will call it based just for stating your mind
Merkava 3 tanks should go back down to 10.7. Current armor is not viable at 11.0 and reload speed cripples any semblance of flexibility they may have had.
Netz is fine at 12.0, it can’t compete directly with many of the top tier competitors in missile thunder, the only redeeming factor for the F-16A-10 is the flight performance, which isn’t particularly useful in top tier ARB.
4 Likes
T72AV - BMP2M - 2S38 they are too good for downtier matches.They deserve 10.3
3 Likes
Why everytime this thread is full of Tank subjects, when there is many other point to consider,…
Vidar needs to be AT LEAST 8.3… Thats the least it should be. Laser rangefinder+ Thermals + Almost Guaranteed Overpressure+ Stupid reload + Good mobility, this all sounds like MBTs. How come, now that the tiger 2 H is 7.0, am i going to be facing all of that in a tiger two that historically speaking, its chassis would’ve reached its service hour limit BEFORE THE VIDAR EXISTED
1 Like
Lmao at KA and Z-19 being one of the only top tier helis not having their BR in creased.
2 Likes
Gaijin please take a look at 8.7 to 10.0, in the last BR change you compressed these Br’s too much, tanks without thermal vision are facing 10.0, tanks without stabilizer facing 9.7…
You had to increase all Battle ratings starting from 7.3, but you basically pushed everything against the ceiling (10.0).
The game relieved the compression of the lower Br’s, but it greatly compressed 9.0 (which was previously 8.7) to 10.0
3 Likes
Just echoing other posts regarding moving the Netz to 12.3. Having basically slightly better Aim-9Ls does not justify moving it up in BR while also having the F-16AJ stay at 12.0 with a better weapons package.
1 Like
No it’s not lmao… All aspects have no right being that low I don’t care how dogass the platform they are attached to is. Nobody needs to be fighting all aspects in a flareless aircraft.
Things like the A-10/A-6 and Su-25 being 10.0 are the reason stuff like the MiG-19 and F-104S and yak-38 went down in BR where they are currently broken OP in a downtier or at tier battle.
Moving the all aspect machines to 10.7 and hard locking 10.7 from seeing 10.0 or below would allow gaijin to readjust the battle ratings of all of the 9.0-10.0 aircraft to better balance and decompress that entire BR range and actually make it enjoyable and somewhat balanced again.
2 Likes
spsk at 9.7, how can you be that stupid (it’s not a question of “are”, here it’s just how much, play your game…)? the spsk is by far the best 10.0 out there and should be at least 10.3, not going at 9.7. let’s just remember that at 9.7 IT WILL FACE FLARELESS SUB/TRANSONIC JETS WORSE IN EVERY SINGLE WAY!!! i’m not really interested to get anihilated by flying cheatcodes in planes that can’t touch it, can’t counter it and can just die from it (let’s remember it has r60s…). and also tell me how the F the spsk is equivalent to the mirage milan, do you plan to give it magics then?
4 Likes
And i know people are gonna say “Muuhhhh but the centurion and leopard 1 are MBTs they dont have it” im likening it to things such as early M1 abrams, early Leopard 2’s, etc, etc.