Yes that’s the problem
Incredibly false statement
It only gets stronger by uptiering a 4.7 tank to 5.0 is an honestly insane statement
1 Like
ROCAF F-104G 10.7-10.3
No countermeasures, no all aspect missiles. Should be the same as the F-104J if there are no plans for AIM-9P4’s or more loadouts.
5 Likes
A single tank is not a lineup.
Why is the t-90a still in 10.7 it’s like a t-80u but with a worst reload and a worst reverse
I mean, there’s the T14 but it’s a premium that not everyone has, and tbh it’s extremely strong and doesn’t really need a lineup
The tank is useless because there is no reason to grind the 5.0 tanks now US is encouraged to skip to 5.3
They served a purpose before to introduce mid WW2 now there is no reason to grind them, it would be better to get 5.3
Insulting me because you can’t develop an argument that justifies the unjustifiable I would suggest personal introspection
Yes that’s the problem
Because your tank belongs at a higher BR and doesn’t deserve to see the lower BR tanks it saw before, because it performs similarly to tanks on its new BR.
Also, again, wording. you don’t see more uptiers, like you claimed. getting a 5.0 match in a 5.0 tank is not an uptier, even if it was formerly 4.7
Why is gaijin ruining china’s 8.7 lineup every single update? It’s one of china’s only good br and gaijin just keeps on nerfing it. Last br changes, they moved the ptl02 and aft. Now, they remove 3 mbts from the lineup. Now China has to use 9.0 which faces lots of uptiers
3 Likes
Yes Gaijin has shown they fundamentally do not care about lineups which betrays a very critical misunderstanding of their own game
No wonder Premium ODL is so heavily incentivized Gaijin doesn’t play their own game to understand that without full lineups people will leave, they don’t even recognize the issue exists
Inexcusable
1 Like
Shittiest take ive ever seen lol
Almost like lower BR tanks are not a effective as higher BR vehicles. Shocking :O
You know that all those mean Panthers and Tigers are also going up?
There is no feature of the M4A1 76 which justifies its placement at 5.0
Gaijin adjusts BRs for vehicles based upon the its in game statistics. Of course they are capable of tweeking that for whatever reason they want, but , notionally, BR changes are made off of data.
no, it means US doesn’t have a 4.7 lineup to destroy, and it doesn’t change much for the M4A1 76 to go to 5.0 anyway, since you would take it with the 5.0 heavies anyway. or uptier your 4.3s to 4.7 to take the M4A1 76 at 4.7
How intersting! You uptiered apaches which are carrying agm-114, really bad atgm. And in the same time swedish mi-28A with convinient 16x Ataka atgm is staying on 10.3??? It even has flares, YAH-64 does not.
Make mi-28a at least 10.7 and give YAH-64 flares or let it stay 10.7. Either way you can’t use yah-64 on distances which roland doesn’t cover.
1 Like
Yes I know Gaijin is ruining the entire WW2 BR bracket with zero understanding of how it works
Almost as if it should be placed at 4.7
skink should go to 3.3 with ap removed or at max 1/4 ap. I don’t give a f about the stats, skink is there to provide a reliable AA to britain to THE LOWER TIER. OTHERWISE WHY THE f WOULD I WANT TO PLAY THE SKINK OVER THE BOSVARK!!! as for the crusader aa, just lower the ap count and lower it to 2.7-3.0 (to be able to make a crusader theme lineup without having to go over br because of the crusader AA). Gaijin should keep lineup consistent, and not destroying the game everytime they change the brs…
3 Likes
Didn’t they say in their previous promises they’d change the way they evaluate BR changes?
1 Like
Gaijin’s inability to understand its own tech trees is not my fault.