I do hate facing it tbh, its stupid fast with trolly turret and 20mm. I see it more as a light tank more than anything else so maybe moving it up should be alright.
1 Like
i mean, its bettter than the leo2av which is 10.0 with the 105mm gun.
the 2k is an absolute menace cause its armour actually can work sometimes, and due to the mobility it can dodge a lot and flank alot. its like if you gave the XM1 a better profile, and a 120mm gun, with a 10.3 round
Not an analog. Has a total of four IR missiles and can’t lead the missile. LAV-AD can carry twice to four times as many missiles and has the option of anti tank with its hydra. The shilka does compare to the ozelot who I think is a Br above it.
so it would still be alright going up against a5s? that have a higher top speed better turn time and missiles that pull 35 g’s from rear and flares?
Chieftain mk10 : 9.0 > 9.0 (stay) Reason : Low mobility for MBTs, the BR is an error. We’re Still waition the mk11 variant (TOGs system) to be at the BR.
Chieftain Mk3 8.7 > 8.3 Reason : Mk5 is 8.7, mk3 is slower and should fix the 8.3 British lineup.
3 Likes
GRB GAB, Vidar, 8.3 or 8.7, it’s over bearing at its current BR.
1 Like
Gaijin is more likely to have that as the next premium since its been a hot minute since they added a prem jet.
If thier going to move it up they better give it the fucking thermals at least. Stupid of them not to. Along with giving the mk 5 its lrf and moving the mk 3 down to 8.3.
1 Like
I kinda agree, the tigershart should go down, not a lot but it should go down a bit maybe 0.3 down
1 Like
I don’t see any issue with it to be honest. Never struggle to kill them when I fight them since they’re big and unarmored. And from memory I couldn’t tell you the last time I died to one.
im gonna be that guy, ive already spaded 3 harriers, and can tell you exactly, that the GR1 is fine going against A5Cs , it isnt ideal no, but you i know are gunning it straight for a base then letting someone get behind you. hence why you specifically bring up the A5C, the A5C is a non issue it compresses like mad over mach 1 in a turn, its air break sucks, its guns suck, and magic 1s arent some un beatable missile either, rocket pods can beat them
and again, you would ruin the entire 7.7, 8.3 even most 8.7s cant touch a harrier because you cant use the thing properly? the GR1 has 4, 4 sraams, that in 9.7 arent that good cause its slower, but you want it to go to 8,7 where 4 sraams would be absolutely insanely potent on such a fast air frame.
also it doesnt lose that much speed even in a 180 turn so yeah.
1 Like
Crazy to me that the chieftain would go up in BR yet the T55 AM-1 stays at 8.7 lmao
4 Likes
I mean its at 12.0 rn with 2 7fs and 4 9ls. But then again that would make it the same br as the f104asa with either 4 9ls or 2 9ls and 2 aspides with no gun. all while having an rwr that doesnt tell you direction… They need to move that thing down asap.
the mk5 could also get its better ammo and LRF and go up to 9.0, the mk3 shouldnt go down as 7.3s do struggle alot against the thing.
the mk10 to 9.3 is just ridiculous though, even if it got togs, should just put the mk11 in and give it the full upgrade package
1 Like
Dont get me started, youll bring out the vatnicks thall talk your ear off trying to explain why the t55am is worse than your chieftain mk3 (im not even kidding, they were straight up saying its more armoured with a better gun and all lmao).
who tf is gonna bring dumb fire rockets in a plane thats 9.7? thats just pure stupidity
The f20 is 12.7 rn and if u take the sparrows you can only take 2 9Ls
Use them as flares mate, its what i do in my t2 and f1 as they refuse to give my f1 its flare pods…
Damn, i thought it was 12.3 last i checked. Yeah, that thing shouldnt be facing viggens with ARH missiles lol. 12.3 would be fine.
(grippens)
1 Like
Hey, ive gotten into people who believe a vehicle have 30mm more pen at 60° warrants it being the same BR despite having worse mobility and armor lol