i mean, its bettter than the leo2av which is 10.0 with the 105mm gun.
the 2k is an absolute menace cause its armour actually can work sometimes, and due to the mobility it can dodge a lot and flank alot. its like if you gave the XM1 a better profile, and a 120mm gun, with a 10.3 round
Not an analog. Has a total of four IR missiles and can’t lead the missile. LAV-AD can carry twice to four times as many missiles and has the option of anti tank with its hydra. The shilka does compare to the ozelot who I think is a Br above it.
Chieftain mk10 : 9.0 > 9.0 (stay) Reason : Low mobility for MBTs, the BR is an error. We’re Still waition the mk11 variant (TOGs system) to be at the BR.
Chieftain Mk3 8.7 > 8.3 Reason : Mk5 is 8.7, mk3 is slower and should fix the 8.3 British lineup.
If thier going to move it up they better give it the fucking thermals at least. Stupid of them not to. Along with giving the mk 5 its lrf and moving the mk 3 down to 8.3.
I don’t see any issue with it to be honest. Never struggle to kill them when I fight them since they’re big and unarmored. And from memory I couldn’t tell you the last time I died to one.
im gonna be that guy, ive already spaded 3 harriers, and can tell you exactly, that the GR1 is fine going against A5Cs , it isnt ideal no, but you i know are gunning it straight for a base then letting someone get behind you. hence why you specifically bring up the A5C, the A5C is a non issue it compresses like mad over mach 1 in a turn, its air break sucks, its guns suck, and magic 1s arent some un beatable missile either, rocket pods can beat them
and again, you would ruin the entire 7.7, 8.3 even most 8.7s cant touch a harrier because you cant use the thing properly? the GR1 has 4, 4 sraams, that in 9.7 arent that good cause its slower, but you want it to go to 8,7 where 4 sraams would be absolutely insanely potent on such a fast air frame.
also it doesnt lose that much speed even in a 180 turn so yeah.
I mean its at 12.0 rn with 2 7fs and 4 9ls. But then again that would make it the same br as the f104asa with either 4 9ls or 2 9ls and 2 aspides with no gun. all while having an rwr that doesnt tell you direction… They need to move that thing down asap.
the mk5 could also get its better ammo and LRF and go up to 9.0, the mk3 shouldnt go down as 7.3s do struggle alot against the thing.
the mk10 to 9.3 is just ridiculous though, even if it got togs, should just put the mk11 in and give it the full upgrade package
Dont get me started, youll bring out the vatnicks thall talk your ear off trying to explain why the t55am is worse than your chieftain mk3 (im not even kidding, they were straight up saying its more armoured with a better gun and all lmao).
you really just said that. the rockets i still use on mig19, hunter F6, heck any jet without flares, T2, F3H etc.
the rockets are used as a flare and can distract the missiles, so no its not pure stupidity, what is stupidity is demanding a jet that under performs a bit at 9,7 go to 8,7 you have either no understanding of the game, or no care about it.
now this is off topic, if youd like to continue speak to me off the forum