or Sea Harrier FA2
Ground realistic, Merkava Mk.2D, 9.7 > 9.3
I totally agree, I’ve been wanting to write that too. Merkava Mk.2D should be at 9.3 instead of at 9.7. This tank is incredibly slow, has a weaker cannon and only slightly better armour. It never had much of an advantage against the 10.7 (also despite the current decompression).
1 Like
thanks, edited it
So the solution is to throw them at better planes, with better missiles, with HMDs, and far more 40G capable A2A IR missiles while also not giving them anything to improve their chance against them? If the B is being moved up, 100% it should get the 9Ms. But the As are going up too and they don’t have much of anything to deal with 13.0+ air frames.
All of the M26 should go back from 6.7 to 6.3 in RB together with the tiger IIp
4 Likes
this is a very sigma suggest from an alpha wolf pls gaijoobles consider the above
finally someone said it, these things face jets absolutely out of their league. If they added the HG series, it’d probably be a better match up to where the current 262s reside. goddamn
1 Like
Su-27 ASB 13.3 > 13.0
For reasons unknown to me, it is ONLY in the top lineup, where, to put it mildly, it cannot open up, in the absence of ARHs and normal RWR. At 13.0, the ASB already includes JAS-39, F-15A and AV-8B+, while Grippen surpasses the Su-27 in flight characteristics, Harrier - in maneuverability and the presence of ARHs. At the same time, all 3 of the above-mentioned aircraft have top IR and SARH missiles. With a larger number of missiles, the Su-27’s effectiveness is compensated by its GIANT size and very rapid loss of speed in a turn, and disgusting RWR, which in its current form (aircraft drawing at 12 km) forces you to use radar, abandoning the IRST and radar capture in the HMD
1 Like
Ground AB, Maus. 8.0 > 7.7. The Maus faces too many MBTs at this BR and should match its Realistic BR in Arcade, as this would at least slightly help with it facing too many modern rounds. The Maus is already far from overperforming at this BR in RB and 7.7 is far more suitable than 8.0 for it in AB.
4 Likes
hope they do and maybe 10.7 then but dm23 4sec reload still slaps so hard
Why AMX to 10.0 to 11.0 and saggitario to 9.3 that fight plane with missle when it don’t have flare, and F-104 that are at 11.0 with worse missle than 10.0 plane ; good work gaijin love your hate versus italy
2S38 should go at least 11.0 if not 11.3. It was and still is better than HSTV-L, even if the APFSDS round penetrates slightly lower at 0 degrees but it has faster Rate of Fire, more ammo, better thermals and is doing better in SPAA role than other dedicated SPAAs as well (due to it’s HE-VT round). It also gets more smoke grenades and LWR, giving it better survivability and great tools versus helicopters and CAS elements.
2 Likes
Why AMX to 10.0 to 11.0 ? not talking about to saggitario to 9.3 that fight plane with missle when it don’t have flare, and F-104 that are at 11.0 with worse missle than 10.0 plane with dogfight capability of a wooden trunk . Please rework the Br to the plane for italy
1 Like
Ground RB, Kugelblitz, 7.0 > 6.7. Reason :
After the Jacob De Marre armor penetration value changes, the 30 mm MK 103 HVAP shell lost around 22% of its previous armor penetration and its now unrealistically underperforming. The vehicle platform itself is a WWII Pz 4 chassis with poor mobility for the current battle rating, which is a battle rating with not a single other vehicle present, forcing players to use it for br. 7.3 to 7.7 line ups. And that ain’t right.
9 Likes
Realistic Air, G 91 YS. 9.3 > 9.0.
It’s a flareless, transonic plane going against supersonic planes and all-aspect missiles, the G. 91 Y already sits at 9.0 and they are basically the same plane, the Y has the nords manually guided missiles, and the YS has the AIM-9B of very limited utily, I don’t think their presence warrants a 0.3 br increase.
1 Like
for the love of god up the F-8U already, it’s been totally clubbing at 10.0 for months now
4 Likes
This! This is exactly what I was talking about, plus it should get the full HVAP belt, if someone wants HE in their belt, bring the HE belt then
Hello, please provide an additional BR separation for Helicopter EC as well. There’s great difference between 7.7-8.0 helicopters and 9.3 ones, while 9.7 helicopters will struggle to do anything versus 11.0 and higher. We need an intermediate 3rd bracket, around 9.3 - 10.3 as well for Heli EC mode as well in order to better balance out the matches.
Air Realistic Battles, F4s Phantom 12.0>11.7. In the current matchmaker the F4s faces the f15a, F16’s and Mirage 4000’s. All aircraft that outclass the f4s in weapons capability’s (Irccm, smokeless-motors) and in performance(Speed, maneuverability, climb rate, etc.) With the proposed change of moving the J11 and Su27 that will make the matchmaker even less favorable to the f4s.
1 Like
Ki-84 hei (AirRB) 6.3 → 6.0 or 5.7
The Ki-84 hei has the same flight-performance as the Ki-84 ko, which is at 5.3.
The only difference is the armament.
But the 30mm on the 84 hei are not good, as they are on the wings and have a very bad velocity, making aiming them in dogfights and in general atrocious.
Therefore the Ki-84 hei should be lowered in BR to ar least 6.0, or even to 5.7, as the flight performance is the same as the Ki-84 ko and the armament is somehow worse.
2 Likes