12.0 for Air RB would be fine.
Air RB, Netz. 12.7>12.3. This is for the lack of radar guided missiles, which makes getting kills insanely difficult with the amount of counter-meassures that planes in this range can carry, pythons 3 might be the best ir missile without irccm but its not enough to compete with a good radar missile such as the AIM sevens.
GRB Char 2C 2.3 > 1.7 BR. This tank is just awful, it really only has good explosive filler and high crew count, but the armor is easily penned by everything and it fights long barrel Panzer IVs in uptiers.
5 Likes
At its current br the F-14s can run into planes that have so bad rwr that they cannot fight phoenixes and fakours. You cannot consistantly notch or dodge (worst case scenario) a missile when you may not even know where exacly it is coming from. New weapons could be a good way to buff the F-14B so it is still good even against bigger br planes.
And it too have criminally low BR. As all soviet SPAAs do, for some reason.
I can swear, in any battle there always will be at least 2-3 shilkas just spawn chilling, because they’re waiting for free kills to come to them. I wonder why somebody even bothers to spawn planes at 7.7+ at all.
But still, M163 shouldn’t facing props, it’s just cringe. It was perfectly okay at 8.0 for many years, why exactly now it suddenly should be at 7.3?
GRB Magach 5 8.0 > 8.3 This is pretty much a sidegrade of the M48A2 G A2 (slightly worse engine, but gets ERA) and so it should be the same BR.
1 Like
Theres no way the F8F needs to be moved down, it’s already one of the most powerful planes you can face at tier if it gets a downtier it just eats the lobby alive, just leave it where it is (or even consider bumping it up a step, seriously it’s a crazy plane)
2 Likes
M48A2 G A2 being 8.3 is the problem, it should be at most 8.0
3 Likes
MF forgot the tornado F.3 late and Shar FA.2 exists
xdddxdxxdxddxdxdx no
or Sea Harrier FA2
Ground realistic, Merkava Mk.2D, 9.7 > 9.3
I totally agree, I’ve been wanting to write that too. Merkava Mk.2D should be at 9.3 instead of at 9.7. This tank is incredibly slow, has a weaker cannon and only slightly better armour. It never had much of an advantage against the 10.7 (also despite the current decompression).
1 Like
thanks, edited it
So the solution is to throw them at better planes, with better missiles, with HMDs, and far more 40G capable A2A IR missiles while also not giving them anything to improve their chance against them? If the B is being moved up, 100% it should get the 9Ms. But the As are going up too and they don’t have much of anything to deal with 13.0+ air frames.
All of the M26 should go back from 6.7 to 6.3 in RB together with the tiger IIp
4 Likes
this is a very sigma suggest from an alpha wolf pls gaijoobles consider the above
finally someone said it, these things face jets absolutely out of their league. If they added the HG series, it’d probably be a better match up to where the current 262s reside. goddamn
1 Like
Su-27 ASB 13.3 > 13.0
For reasons unknown to me, it is ONLY in the top lineup, where, to put it mildly, it cannot open up, in the absence of ARHs and normal RWR. At 13.0, the ASB already includes JAS-39, F-15A and AV-8B+, while Grippen surpasses the Su-27 in flight characteristics, Harrier - in maneuverability and the presence of ARHs. At the same time, all 3 of the above-mentioned aircraft have top IR and SARH missiles. With a larger number of missiles, the Su-27’s effectiveness is compensated by its GIANT size and very rapid loss of speed in a turn, and disgusting RWR, which in its current form (aircraft drawing at 12 km) forces you to use radar, abandoning the IRST and radar capture in the HMD
1 Like
Ground AB, Maus. 8.0 > 7.7. The Maus faces too many MBTs at this BR and should match its Realistic BR in Arcade, as this would at least slightly help with it facing too many modern rounds. The Maus is already far from overperforming at this BR in RB and 7.7 is far more suitable than 8.0 for it in AB.
4 Likes
hope they do and maybe 10.7 then but dm23 4sec reload still slaps so hard