@Stona_WT sorry for the ping but with the Finnish KV-1A going down in br can we expect its price to match other 4.7 tanks of the same Rank? And for those unfortunate enough to buy the vehicle will GE be given back?
I mean all of russia’s SPAA’s are insanely undertiered and are insanely op the only one they’ve nerfed is the Strela cuz its 10.3 instead of 9.7 or 9.3 where it was originally. I don’t even know how the 2s6 is 10.7 when all of the other nations top tier SPAA’s are literally worse than it. Type 81 (sam) for example is 11.3 which is fine now cuz type 90’s but before it made 0 sense. and its worse by far than the 2s6. Also got a shulka now at 7.3 because russia needed more SPAA
2 Likes
Su-27SM has 2 datalink channels.
F-4F ICE has 4, and Tornado F3 has >/=4 as well.
I’m never going to fly Su-27SM or J-11A even if it stays 13.7, so it’s not a selfish request; it’s a request after a couple hours of cross-analysis with every other jet.
Mig-29SMT is better at BVR than Su-27SM despite having 2 less radar missiles, and 6 less store positions. Of course that makes Mig-29SMT less capable of WVR than aircraft with 8+ store positions.
PUMA VJTF (and Lynx) (GroundRB) 10.7 → 10.7
Same as the PUMA, the 30mm is underperforming (straight up bad), the armor is lackluster and the spikes are unreliable. Even with higher pen, as they don’t fly correctly.
Also Germany does not have a 10.7 now, 11.0 after the changes, lineup for the PUMA, so it would fit better into the then 10.7 with the Leopard 2A4 and the Vilkas (which also has Spikes) and the FlaRakPz.
It also wouldn’t face the then 12.0, now 11.7 in uptiers.
Also: The Namer30, also with a 30mm and Spikes, has a .3 lower BR with comparable survivability and armor.
4 Likes
sea harrier frs1(sqv) arb, 11.7->11.3, despite it hase 4 aim9l, its still underpowered in compare to aircrafts it can face with
1 Like
If the 279 was realistic it would be terrible and they could keep it at 9.0. Year of development doesn’t matter but please Char B1 to -3.0.
1 Like
sea harrier frs1(sqv) arb, 11.3->11.0, although it has 4 aim9l, it’s still underpowered in comparison to aircraft it can face with
So that justifies it facing 10.7-11.0-11.3 Jets? Make it completely unplayable because it can handle itself in a downtier?
What about the MiG-21S, J35A, G.91 R/4, F-5C, Jaguar GR.1 and F-100F and French Sea Hawk MK.50, Russian BI, British Sea Vixen, p-59A ? All of those DOMINATE in a downtier and face enemies with no counter measures, yet continue to be able to do so, and have for years. The ONE good aircraft Israel has until 11.3-13.0 is the Ayit and now its going to be unusable. You know the thing cant even go above subsonic right?
It is nowhere near good enough to be fair to fight top tier with
aab*
GRB, All Leclere . 12.0 > 11.0/11.7. The Leclere’s are in a terrible state to put it bluntly. Their 5s reload is now being matched by other vehicles at a LOWER BR than themselves, with a terrible round that has to face rounds that go up to 600mm+. The Leclere’s are being pulled into a BR that seems “comparable” to the SepV2, T-90M, T-80BVM, Challanger 2 ATD, ect ect, the fact that the Leclere’s with their rounds being nowhere comparable, means that they should not be at the same BR as the “new top tier”. The Leclere’s armor is paper and is not justified because it has an autoloader, while the russians have autoloaders at 9.7, does that mean they are comparable to top tier? Not at all.
I do think that the T-72b year 86 and 89 should remain 10.0 due to mobility. At least keep the 72b 86version 10.0 no kontak-5 on it.
Red tops can be defeated by turning slightly.
1 Like
Water is wet
I wasnt talking about them, but yes it has strong missile it goes up because of that. The J35a you mentioned has mid flight performance with 4 aim 9bs its essentially a worse starfughter especially with its 30mms. Compression is a problem and i dont like super sonics fighting subs but gaijin wants that to happen so shall be it.
Me 262 C-1 7.3 to 7.0
AGS add m900 round
XM8 from 9.3 to 10.0 add M900 and it’s missing blow out panels from years
ZSU-23-4m4 9.3 to 10.0
10.5cm tiger II 7.0 to 6.7 it’s tiger with bigger weak spots.
Leclercs are the most sad MBTS fix the Armour or give them new round
LOSAT br change won’t help the tank it’s the way the missiles works is wrong and need to be fix or reworked and it’s still tracking system.
Object 248 6.7 to 6.3
Give Air spawn to Su-25T / Su-39 / A-10A / A-10late / A-10C
A-10C 11.3 to 12.0
ngl worst take ive seen in a long time
Okay, glad you just ignore all of the other jets with equal or stronger missiles at the same, and even lower BR.
You clearly have a bias, ignoring that this jet was cherry picked out of the suspiciously low BR premium jets.
Give m1a1 aim better round and give f14b aim9m
RB, Ho-229 6.0>7.0. Reason: The flight model is very unwieldy, it lacks its ordnance and has multiple model errors such as the guns being too far apart and Angled when they weren’t in the original. Also buff the ammo belts.