Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Feedback time:
“Single vehicle rule:”
F-104S ASA should move to 11.7. Its weapon systems are only slightly superior to that of Mig-23MLD while having worse flight performance.

1 Like

Yet they raise the subsonic Ayit with no radar and one of the worst RWR systems to 10.0, losses hundreds of km/h in just seconds. Im sure all the 10.7-11.0-11.3 modern day aircraft really need another 1950’s Frankenstein jet to get free kills on.

I was hoping Tornados IDS’ getting all lowered BRs. Given the fact how badly they get massacred and how slow they are, compared to other competitors to kill the bases. For GRB they have meh ordnance as well.

the jas39a does need to go up in br, even if its by 0.3, it should not be able to fight the 12.0’s

The F8U is still at 10.0 while the F-1 and F-4C, with worse FM’s and no CM, are at 10.3.
The A-5C getting its BR raised to 10.7 should not even be a thing.
Are US pilots really that bad with the bearcat, that the statistics say it should go down in BR?

2 Likes

Ah yes, because the Tornado F3 Late and F4F-ICE are equal to the 12x AAM slinging Su-27SM. That is 100% a fair fight.

Me when I make a list instead of spamming it as 5 different comments (feedback not accepted)

1 Like

Realistic Battles, J6K1, 6.7 > 6.3.
The Japanese J6K1 from the Operation Frost 2019/20 event is unplayable at 6.7. It faces jets that can outperform it and run circles around it. The J6K1 use to be 6.0 when it was added. It use to be fun to play and actually competitive. Now it is not fun to play due it it facing cold war jets almost every match. I am disappointed that I ground out the event back in 2019/20 to get this plane and now it is unplayable. At 6.7 it gets up tiered to 7.3 and 7.7 too often and gets destroyed. If it were at 6.3 it would be balanced to face other high tier props and some low tier jets occasionally. Please consider lowering the J6K1 to 6.3.
Thank you,
WAR_TANKER

2 Likes

Because AIM 9D’s vs flareless oponents is strong

Yes.

Ja37D 11.3<11.7 add the aim-120 as it had in real life, this would also create a bigger difference between the two jakt Viggen. Bonus, this would make it so Sweden has more than one aeroplane with fox 3.

btw you dont even have the A-10C, so how can you speak on how it should be rated?

If the game was solely balanced off statistics, the Abrams would be 7.3 by now with how terrible the average USA player is. I cannot imagine it’s all too different from air, considering what I hear from my friend who is an air main.

I’m quite happy Gaijin is incorporating more community feedback and seems to be taking a more nuanced approach to balancing as well. This is a very strong step forward

JA37D with 2x AMRAAM would be 13.0. (A second JA37D could be added to fullfill this but it shouldnt move up as it would leave a giant hole and teh JA37D with AMRAAM would be one of the weakest 13.0s in game)

JA37D is currently 12.0 and is probably about right for now with its current loadout, although BOL needs to be fixed.

2 Likes

Kugelblitz (GroundRB): 7.0 → 6.7

The Kugelblitz with its 7.0 BR sits at a strange point in the German TT. There is the late WW2 lineup at 6.7 or the early ColdWar lineup at 7.7.
So naturally one plays the Kugelblitz at the higher lineup, not to uptier the 6.7 to 7.0.

To fit the lineup better, the Kugelblitz should therefor be 6.7

13 Likes

GRB/RB, Me262 A-1a/U4 . 6.3 > 7.3. The Me262 U4 is by far, alongside the Arado C-2, to be the most oppressive aircraft at their BR, And germany doesn’t even have a lineup at 6.3 other than Tank Destroyers, so moving it down will either bring 6.0 german vehicles to 6.3 that will be pulled into 7.3, or the U4 will be pulled into BRs such as 6.7, 7.3 and in some cases, 8.0. So it makes no sense for the U4 to be moved to 6.3 where it can cause further damage with no way of countering it.

GRB CV9030 9.3 > 8.7 this vehicle doesn’t have the mobility or any characteristics that warrant it being in the 9.x bracket. Of the 30mm bushmaster tanks the 9030 lacks the mobility and versatility all other vehicles carry. It is not a suitable 9.x vehicle unlike the other 30mm bushmaster carriers.

1 Like

After playing the V1 for a few games I completely support this. The guns are no longer lazerbeams and its flight performance is really sub-par

1 Like

Leclerc s1/2 with stock heat at 12.0 is such a great idea

3 Likes

Lack of BR increase for F8U is a joke and it only shows that gayjoobs have no idea/dont really care what’s going on in their own game