the speed on the stat card is not correct, yes you can reach this speed but only at high altitudes like 16,000 m
1 Like
I love playing the F8U-2, but maan it’s busted.
10.3 should be good enough, though.
It has no data link so it’s aim120 is easly chaffable
I have run out of likes but completly agree.
1 Like
Is still a LOT higher than almost all other aircraft at 9.3, let alone 9.0
1 Like
But it doesn’t even have a single smoke grenade, and it’s armour is PRETTY WEAK. Meantime, half of its turret is filled with ammo.
Ground RB, Type 87 RCV (P) 7.7 > 7.3
It is a big target, with no survivability, lacking firepower and doesnt have any lineup at 7.7 while 7.3 lineup both lacks light vehicle and an 7.3 spaa. While SUB I-II has the same armament it doesnt provide anything else and lacks survivability and Type 87 RCV (P) would be able to be used not only as a 7.3 scout but also as spaa backup.
6 Likes
A-4N Ayit [AIR RB] 9.3 → 10.0
This is one of the most obscenely broken aircraft of the BR range and possibly in the entire game. WHY is it considered fair for it to have CMs and 4 missiles that are AIM-9D and equivalent at a low BR of 9.3? F8U-2 has similar armement at 10.0 and is considered absurdly OP due to it. A-4N consistently scores 4 and 5-kill games when it is flown by competent players. So why isnt it going up?
9 Likes
Why aren’t top tier SPAAs getting moved up as well?
1 Like
Hood can’t take 6crh shells, her autoloader wasn’t modified for it, and Barham is in too early of a refit for 6crh also iirc.
Renown could get them though. And Hood I think can still get an upgraded shell but with a 4crh head.
1 Like
neither are those CAS aircraft. gaijin must be insane
With the goofy flight model nerf of the J35XS, I think it could go down to 10.7 without being too overpowered. SARH missiles are a bitch when you don’t have RWR.
I own and loved it, so maybe I’m biased.
I mean sure but like it would be nice if they got DM33, would it hurt anyone? No.
Its already at 11.7…
26 rounds is enough, and the spalling you do to it is lackluster. The armour is enough to stop 20mms, so you MUST use your main gun to kill it (unless you’re an SPAA). The mobility is insane, the gun depression is very good, the reload is great, the round it uses could be better, but it’s still good as long as you know what you’re doing. the 30mm is incredible (You can break barrels, tracks, and even kill things with the SAPHEI on the lower-side of T-55AM1s, cupola shots on the M60 AOSs, etc.).
Also, M1 Abrams should get M833, M774 seems kinda underwhelming for a tank that’s about to be 10.7 soon.
3 Likes
GRB, Begleitpanzer 57, 9.3 > 9.7.
Begleitpanzer is also an underbr’d IFV. I think increasing it’s br - to AT THE VERY LEAST - 9.7, would be a great decision. It gets a decent 57mm APCBC round, access to HE-VT, Thermals, Laser Rangefinder, TOWs (although those aren’t…all too nice to use right now), an incredible firerate for a 57mm, great mobility, stabilizer. It VASTLY outperforms the CV9030, Dardo-80/60.
1 Like
more realistic in my opinion R2Y2 V1 8.0 > 7.3
because its unable to outrun the jets it encounters
it’s acceration is very slow. a prop plane can easily catch up.
in my opinion the kikka should be going from 7.0 > 6.7 because of its limited ammo of just 100.
the meme, the Ki-200 should either stay at its current BR or go to 8.7 > 8.3
im willing to change my mind, but this is what i think is better for those vehicles
2 Likes
Object 279 9.0 > 9.7/10.0
Superior to all 9.3 and some 9.7 yet it sits at a BR where it can terrorize 8.0 tanks.
What’s wrong with it?