neither are those CAS aircraft. gaijin must be insane
With the goofy flight model nerf of the J35XS, I think it could go down to 10.7 without being too overpowered. SARH missiles are a bitch when you don’t have RWR.
I own and loved it, so maybe I’m biased.
I mean sure but like it would be nice if they got DM33, would it hurt anyone? No.
Its already at 11.7…
26 rounds is enough, and the spalling you do to it is lackluster. The armour is enough to stop 20mms, so you MUST use your main gun to kill it (unless you’re an SPAA). The mobility is insane, the gun depression is very good, the reload is great, the round it uses could be better, but it’s still good as long as you know what you’re doing. the 30mm is incredible (You can break barrels, tracks, and even kill things with the SAPHEI on the lower-side of T-55AM1s, cupola shots on the M60 AOSs, etc.).
Also, M1 Abrams should get M833, M774 seems kinda underwhelming for a tank that’s about to be 10.7 soon.
3 Likes
GRB, Begleitpanzer 57, 9.3 > 9.7.
Begleitpanzer is also an underbr’d IFV. I think increasing it’s br - to AT THE VERY LEAST - 9.7, would be a great decision. It gets a decent 57mm APCBC round, access to HE-VT, Thermals, Laser Rangefinder, TOWs (although those aren’t…all too nice to use right now), an incredible firerate for a 57mm, great mobility, stabilizer. It VASTLY outperforms the CV9030, Dardo-80/60.
1 Like
more realistic in my opinion R2Y2 V1 8.0 > 7.3
because its unable to outrun the jets it encounters
it’s acceration is very slow. a prop plane can easily catch up.
in my opinion the kikka should be going from 7.0 > 6.7 because of its limited ammo of just 100.
the meme, the Ki-200 should either stay at its current BR or go to 8.7 > 8.3
im willing to change my mind, but this is what i think is better for those vehicles
2 Likes
Object 279 9.0 > 9.7/10.0
Superior to all 9.3 and some 9.7 yet it sits at a BR where it can terrorize 8.0 tanks.
What’s wrong with it?
Yes? Can we get M900 for the Regular M1 Abrams and keep it at the same BR? Hell no. There is a reason why you want DM33 (because it will make the vehicle more broken), and you don’t want any of the repercussions (it going to a higher BR).
Compared to the D model, the additional x2 AIM-9J and CM would not fit in one BR step.
1 Like
T-80 BVM - reduce reload to 5.6 - 6 seconds.
It’s worse than the STRVs and Leopard 2A7 in most ways, and is still USSRs best tank. It loses to almost all top tier tanks in a 1-1 when it doesn’t get a OHK.
Not superior to all of them, but I agree with the sentiment. It should go up to 9.3.
1 Like
Tank - Falcon
Mode - GRB
Br* (clone added without APDS round at 7.3)
Add a clone of the Falcon (or make moduels/ammo that affect BR placement) and stick it at 7.3 to fill a SPAA gap, and it would be simmlar to the ZSU -23 without radar/M163
2 Likes
Everything else is moving up with it, so I don’t see the issue tbh
1 Like
please dont do this
it will hurt the game
it means 10.0 aircraft will now have to deal with high-G PD missiles
which means less safe haven for actual gameplay and more for brainless missile spam
6 Likes
It would be better than the M163, and maybe slightly better than the Shilka without radar.
RB, ZSL92, 6.7 > 7.3 (or higher). This vehicle should receive scouting and APDS and act in a similar fashion to the Wiesel 1A4. China has lots of actual SPAAG vehicle to fill this gap, such as the WZ554…
4 Likes
(realistic), f-4j phantom 2. 12.0< 11.3/11.7
Reasoning: man, it’s just unfair to play this aircraft in a full uptier(which in my case, happens all the time), in 13.0 they all have IRCCM misiles, very good radar misiles, and speed, and the most annoying thing about this aircraft, is that the radar doesn’t work, it never locks something, i know that it has HMD but it’s there for nothing, cuse it doesnt lock anything, even the ACQ doesnt work, its just unfair
2 Likes