:insert laugh emoji:
Less versatile than the Gepard 1A2, sure, but it is much harder to spot than the Gepard 1A2, and gets twice the number of stingers. I think the Gepard 1A2 is slightly better, because it can defend itself from ground vehicles, as well as close-range air targets, but the ozelot is not too bad.
The change from the F-14 A and IRIAF is purely the cry of beginners who buy premium top tier. As did the AIM-120 nerf shortly after it arrived. Congratulations to those involved, you managed to ruin yet another thing.
7.3 is way too low. I’d say 7.7 or 8.0 is reasonable.
2 Likes
Then maybe learn how to play your vehicle instead of complaining about nonexistent problems
1 Like
I disagree with this solution for HSTV-L.
Instead, the vehicle should receive its historical shell choice and gun muzzle speed; that way, with significantly increased firepower (105mm M774-level), it would fit exactly where it is, which is where it belongs.
7 Likes
HSTV-L 11.3>11.7 I find it criminal that the HSTV is going up again and the 2S38 is only going to 10.3 yet it has only ~±50mm less penetration, a higher fire rate, better AA capabilities, and double maybe even triple the ammo count… Oh I almost forget… Gen 3 Thermals. I guess there’s more information on a classified vehicle from 2020 than there is a declassified vehicle from the late 1960’s / early 70’s. I guess I’ll cope.
5 Likes
GRB, Turm III, 8.3 > 8.7.
Turm III STILL being 8.3 is actually just confusing to me. It gets a two-plane stabilizer, good gun handling, 30mm Falcon coaxial, access to good APDS/HEATFS rounds, 5s autoloader, good mobility at 8.3. At this br, it just outperforms like 90% of the vehicles it faces, with the most effective counter to it being perhaps the T-55AM1, which it doesnt even fight against with a 100% chance.
12 Likes
Honestly, I would like too see 10.7/10.3 Draken for just funny.
It would be insanely OP as fuck lmfao
1 Like
We will need to wait another 5 years for that, just like the addition of IRST and proxy shells.
1 Like
the speed on the stat card is not correct, yes you can reach this speed but only at high altitudes like 16,000 m
1 Like
I love playing the F8U-2, but maan it’s busted.
10.3 should be good enough, though.
It has no data link so it’s aim120 is easly chaffable
I have run out of likes but completly agree.
1 Like
Is still a LOT higher than almost all other aircraft at 9.3, let alone 9.0
1 Like
But it doesn’t even have a single smoke grenade, and it’s armour is PRETTY WEAK. Meantime, half of its turret is filled with ammo.
Ground RB, Type 87 RCV (P) 7.7 > 7.3
It is a big target, with no survivability, lacking firepower and doesnt have any lineup at 7.7 while 7.3 lineup both lacks light vehicle and an 7.3 spaa. While SUB I-II has the same armament it doesnt provide anything else and lacks survivability and Type 87 RCV (P) would be able to be used not only as a 7.3 scout but also as spaa backup.
6 Likes
A-4N Ayit [AIR RB] 9.3 → 10.0
This is one of the most obscenely broken aircraft of the BR range and possibly in the entire game. WHY is it considered fair for it to have CMs and 4 missiles that are AIM-9D and equivalent at a low BR of 9.3? F8U-2 has similar armement at 10.0 and is considered absurdly OP due to it. A-4N consistently scores 4 and 5-kill games when it is flown by competent players. So why isnt it going up?
9 Likes
Why aren’t top tier SPAAs getting moved up as well?
1 Like
Hood can’t take 6crh shells, her autoloader wasn’t modified for it, and Barham is in too early of a refit for 6crh also iirc.
Renown could get them though. And Hood I think can still get an upgraded shell but with a 4crh head.
1 Like