You mean those same 10.0 vehicles of which the fast majority will be moved up to 10.3 soon?
You struggle against the current 10.0s (that will soon be 10.3) in your 279, but you have no problems with almost an entire BR (7.7) struggling the same against you if the 279 moves down.
I guess it’s only a problem if it negatively affects you?
As a player spamming old top tier jets(F-2 Sabre, CL-13A, Hunter F.1, MiG-17, F-40 Sabre), I don’t see any problems for staying at its BR.
They all serve as legitimate counterparts eath others.
CL-13B Mk.6 is okey as well because it has steroided engine and wing slats makes it insane dogfighter.
This
(Ground AB) E.B.R. (1951). 4.3 > 4.0 – useless gun at its BR and no line-up to bring with it.
Three inches extra vert pen point blank as well.
And the three Chinese tanks with a depth of 11.0 were changed to a second-stage shell with a penetration depth of 0m of 545mm, and then the penetration depth of the DTC10-125 shell for the top Chinese tank was revised to 629mm
Im pretty sure its the agms, you can use them as psuedo ARH, though it really is just worse than the T imo
Tech-tree adjustement dictated by logic for France :
Switch places between the F-100D and the Alpha Jet E, respectively a fighter in the attacker line and an attacker in the fighter line… Moreover it seems logical to me for the super saber to be after an other sabre and before the F-8 which is literally based on the F-100.
Okey as in what? Going to 9.3 again?
I play it at 5.7 and 7.7 its a good flanker but yeah it should move down. I did better with it at higher BR’s due to bigger maps but the gun is pretty bad.
Tech-tree adjustement dictated by logic for Japan:
Switch places between the Yugumo and the Hatsuharu, because the Hatsuharu is a downgrade of this previous ship in almost every way.
He clearly meant ARB where the Su-25Ts might as well be better trying to get lucky headons with vikhrs.
Air Simulator (maybe realistic), Su-39. 11.7 > 12.0.
This plane is too oppressive with very good all-aspect Pulse-Doppler radar, IRCCM missiles, Vikhrs with proximity fuse which can be used a makeshift air-air missiles (targeting optics can be slaved to radar lock which is a huge advantage to this tactic).
Situational awareness is top priority in simulator battles and this plane has too much of it for 11.7. Given how 11.7 remains top bracket in majority of the rotations, this plane is doing too good for a strike aircraft. I have seen a Su-39 repeatedly farm a German Mig-21 once, I felt bad for that guy. That Mig-21 had poor situational awareness against this Su-39 and there was nothing he could do unless he can somehow maintain 360 degree visual awareness.
Please move the SU-39 up by a step or give it R-77s and move it up accordingly.
Yeah my bad, just realized and deleted comment.
so when will the R2y2’s get downtiered again, same with the kikka for RB
its too high of a BR, sometimes they become unplayable
Maybe 9.0.
If anything, the BRs of other aircraft should be changed, not CL-13. such as F3H, Hunters, afterburning MiG-17, J32B, etc.
When the CL-13B was implemented in 2019, it functioned quite decently as a counterpart to the above aircraft.
can i know which other 10.7 deltas are there?
Yes fine LOL. Need go back 6.3 asap (USA heavies in 6.3 and 6.7 are over 60%)
Do you think it’s easier to move a few problematic vehicles up in BR, or move all the ‘underperforming’ ones down in BR.
Realistic, SU-7BMK. 9.3>9.7. With its current change being moved to 9.7 I think is an unjust decision without at least considering these points: