Actually the german tiger 2p is the best armor (2p) since they never redid the turret armor so its more volumetric. Id agree if it had the other turret armor but for now its fine at 6.7 due to the poor decompression. Though if more decompression comes yes it should go down.
All Leopard 2A4s should get DM33
1 Like
(Air AB) Mystere IIC. 8.7 → 8.3 : same issues than its big brother but with even worst flight performances, especially acceleration.
3 Likes
(Air AB) AV-8A. 9.3 → 9.7 : almost untouchable if flighted well with its countermeasures, huge climb rate and (too much) good missiles for its BR.
(Air AB) Yak-38. (the standard one and the M variant) 9.3 → 9.7 : insanely good missiles for its BR (R60s !!!).
1 Like
The Ayit should go up to 9.7 in Air RB, Aim-9Ds at 9.3 are just way too strong, considering it often times faces jets like the f-86f-2.
3 Likes
(Air AB) Ki-84 hei. 7.7 > 7.0. - 7.7 is way too high for a prop plane with poor top speed.
1 Like
Abrams is universally stronger in almost every resepct to the the Challenger 2. If you think the Abrams is worse, its clear you’ve never played the Challenger 2. Ariette is also weak and should also move down, but unlike the Challenger 2s, is actually decently mobile.
Challenger 2 has the worst mobility AND Armour of any top tier tank in game at the moment. For years this was mitigated by the fact it had one of the fastest reloads at 5 seconds, but now everything has a 5 second reload and many things now even have better shells and armour than it, and yet it has not moved.
TLDR: Abrams looks like a highly competitive top tier tank next to the Challenger 2s at the moment
1 Like
(Air AB) All the Ki-49s. 3.3 > 3.0 & 3.7 > 3.3 - poorly armored bombers with small bomb loads and average speed compare to other nations at the same Brs.
1 Like
Yeah I’ve never understood why the Su-25SM3 is higher that the Su-25T or the Su-39.
Is it the MAWS? Does it having MAWS make it better than having a built in IR jammer?
Surely being warned about a missile isn’t better than missiles not being able to lock on from behind?
Also the SM3 gets less missiles so it being much higher makes less sense.
1 Like
You mean those same 10.0 vehicles of which the fast majority will be moved up to 10.3 soon?
You struggle against the current 10.0s (that will soon be 10.3) in your 279, but you have no problems with almost an entire BR (7.7) struggling the same against you if the 279 moves down.
I guess it’s only a problem if it negatively affects you?
As a player spamming old top tier jets(F-2 Sabre, CL-13A, Hunter F.1, MiG-17, F-40 Sabre), I don’t see any problems for staying at its BR.
They all serve as legitimate counterparts eath others.
CL-13B Mk.6 is okey as well because it has steroided engine and wing slats makes it insane dogfighter.
This
(Ground AB) E.B.R. (1951). 4.3 > 4.0 – useless gun at its BR and no line-up to bring with it.
2 Likes
Three inches extra vert pen point blank as well.
1 Like
And the three Chinese tanks with a depth of 11.0 were changed to a second-stage shell with a penetration depth of 0m of 545mm, and then the penetration depth of the DTC10-125 shell for the top Chinese tank was revised to 629mm
59 Likes
Im pretty sure its the agms, you can use them as psuedo ARH, though it really is just worse than the T imo
Tech-tree adjustement dictated by logic for France :
Switch places between the F-100D and the Alpha Jet E, respectively a fighter in the attacker line and an attacker in the fighter line… Moreover it seems logical to me for the super saber to be after an other sabre and before the F-8 which is literally based on the F-100.
2 Likes
Okey as in what? Going to 9.3 again?
I play it at 5.7 and 7.7 its a good flanker but yeah it should move down. I did better with it at higher BR’s due to bigger maps but the gun is pretty bad.