KPZ-70 should be moved up to 9.7, whereas the MBT-70 should stay at 9.3.
M163 is far too good to be facing prop CAS and ww2 jets.
M163 is good where it is at 7.7. If anything the ZSU-23-4M2 need to move up cuz it got better gun and sit at 7.3.
Ground RB, M113A1 TOW (all versions: China, Italy, Israel). 8.3 > 8.0
At its currect BR, the M113A1 is simply not competitive, as of now it has to be played in one single role and even then it is bad at it. It cannot survive hit, it cannot land a shot first and mostly it cannot even kill things in TWO hits reliably.
IT-1 is 8.7 and I think we can agree that we cannot even compare those two. M113A1 just needs some breathing space, becasue as of now noone bothers to play it.
- one more thing: Israeli M113A1 does not even have a line-up to it
Thanks for considering :)
That would be too logical.
Not sure, but superprops has seen some declines recently(allied players wanting to farm ju288s, axis players jumping on the chance), as well as the fact that some planes would not have an energy advantage compared to the SF11 such as Do335s.
The newest shilka doesn’t have radar
Vehicle: Ta152C-3
Gamemode: Air RB
BR Change: 6.3 ----> 5.7
Reason:Ta152C-3 is anything but maneuverability. I feel that I may be able to win it in dogfight in a Tu-2S. and Ta152 doe not have good climb rate, it’s not good in energy fight.
7.3 is not prop BR, it’s late ww2 / early cold war jet BR.
because its dart is awful and gets its shit kicked in by literally every 9.0 as is.
F-8U absolutely has no business at 10.0, the whole community is in unison saying this and it’s not even included in the first list you publish… Should be 10.3 or even 10.7 with F-8E. 10.3 would be fine if you move F-8E down as well since AIM-9Cs are not game changing enough to justify a BR increase.
Its sad because the M113 chassis is actually the best of the light tank missile carriers, they completely forgot about another vehicle with even worse stats spaded then the stock M113’s lol
Careful cant give Britain a shell that Germany doesnt have yet!
Excuse me as I play the world’s smallest violin for one of the most overpowered jets in the game being made into… still a strong jet just not massively overpowered. It deserves bottom of the barrel last resort minimum 9.7 and I’d still like to see it IN ITS CURRENT STATE at 10.0.
yeah doesn’t matter as long as it cant be caught by anything subsonic. all 9.3 supers are massively overpowered in downtiers because that part of the game is MASSIVELY compressed.
You don’t see me advocating for that to stay at its BR do you?
Yes. It is. I won’t humor the silly ass other side of that opinion. It’s a M61 vulcan with a tracking radar firing on WW2 CAS. I’ve both used it and been against it. It goes WITHOUT SAYING that it doesn’t belong there.
and Spitfire lf mk9 can outclimb everything at this br.
RB AMX-13 (FL11) 4.3 > 3.7 - analog of M24, does not have a stabilizer and Browning
Nor is the M163.
And if you talk about that radar dish, that’s hardly useful considering the FoV of the radar and the maximum lock-on range distance, it’s more practical to spray a target in the general direction it is going at ≈1km than to use that radar
You said “the 109s” when he specified a specific G-14 model. You are not educated on this matter.
The changes between the 2A5 and 2A7 are quite small yet also really big. The thermals are a big deal at top tier but the old A5/6 still use gen 1. I would rather have the 2A5 at a lower br with the 2PL to make a different lineup, like 11.3. If they have to change some ammo for that its fine, its pretty much the same as the A6 anyway.
Forgive me if I’m wrong but can’t the mk10 actually block shots to the turret compared to the khalid? I wish they just made them the same br for a lineup. Someone in this thread said mk10 could get a better round and I hope that’s what they do.
![]()
this is good
but please do the same with the kfir canard, please i beg of you, that thing aint fun to play rn, PLEASEEEEE I BEGGGG