Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

Vehicle: Challenger 3TD
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.7 → 11.3
Reason: It has no armour, is one of the slowest tanks at top tier and is carried by the fact it has DM53, but has a lower fire rate than the Challenger 2s which makes this almost a downgrade over them. If the DM53 was removed, it would barely be higher than 10.7.

Alternative solution. Give DM63 shells for minorly improved surviability and reduce its reload time to 5 seconds to match the Challenger 2. Make it an actual upgrade over all existing Challenger 2s.

14 Likes

Air RB. F14B. 12.7 > 13.0 . Please give this plane AIM9M, the AIM54C is too useless early mid-game at this BR when the team merges and when most games are decided. The plane is hopeless in defending against any IR missile at this BR.

1 Like

Yeah, but it will only hit if you are flying straight or using helicopter

RB pantsir-s1 11.7->12.7 as the strongest spaa in this game,s1 is far more powerful than other country‘s spaa,it should go to 12.7 and fight against f16c,and for sure easily shot down the f16cs

7 Likes

Legitimately almost all of these changes need to be scrapped. It is a miracle that gaijin manages to produce such awful BR changes and STILL manages to push them through despite the entire community screaming for them not to.

1 Like

F-14B does not suffer, get better at flying.

1 Like

I think you forgot the reason we were asking for the max br to go up. Best example is the ariete, which shouldn’t be the same br as the leopard 2a7.

1 Like

Ground realistic, F104S.ASA 11.3 → 10.3.

Reason: Slight better ordanace the the F104G at 10.0. Get access to limted amout of aim9L’s. This warrents higer br. But comparing the F104S.ASA with similar aircraft at lower br like Torando ids (10.3) you see that the F104S.ASA has worse payload, way worse agility, RWR and amout of countermeasures. But it has better speed. Hence it should be at a comparable br (10.3)

2 Likes

Now the 2A7HU exists, they certainly can get a BR decrease.

ARB/ASB
Ju-288 C
6.0>6.7
probably the fastest prop bomber in the game, amazing defensive armament all around and extra strong from the rear, really strong damage model and great flight model
I believe this is long overdue

3 Likes

B model which is stucking at AIM-9Ls will have same BR with Flankers

Ground RB, FlaRakPz 1 10.3 > 9.7
After the SACLOS nerfs ages ago, the roland missile system has been practically useless compared to what it used to be. Yet the german and US rolands have stayed at 10.3 for the longest time for whatever reason.

7 Likes

One more thing to add: the performance of the J35XS is too bad compared to other aircraft with 11.3 BR. Any aircraft with 11.3 BR is far better than the J35XS. The BR of the J35XS needs to be reduced to at least 11.0 or even lower. The AMX A1-A is too slow, and the performance of AAMs is also terrible, soBR needs to be reduced as well.The magnification of the AH-1W’s optics is too low, and the AIM9L and Hellfire missile mounts conflict. Its actual performance is not better than Lynx and A129, it should maintain 10.7 BR.

1 Like

The A-10C is too slow to be viable as a ground attacker at it’s current BR in Air Sim. There are too many Av-8 premiums that just JDAM every ground battle right away.

A-10C should be moved down to 11.0BR.

Air realistic battles, Mig-29. it needs to be lowered in br or get better missiles, it has 2 super strong r27er but the other 4 r60m are extra useless at 12.0

1 Like

Ground RB, XM975 10.3 > 9.7
After the SACLOS nerfs ages ago, the roland missile system has been practically useless compared to what it used to be. Yet the german and US rolands have stayed at 10.3 for the longest time for whatever reason.

3 Likes

Ground realistic, F104S 11.0 → 10.3.

Reason: Slight better ordanace the the F104G at 10.0. This warrents higer br. But comparing the F104S. with similar aircraft at lower br like Torando ids (10.3) you see that the F104S has worse payload, way worse agility, RWR, amout of countermeasures and missiles. But it has better speed. Hence it should be at a comparable br (10.3)

OK, gaijin increase max BR for ground RB higher 12.0

But for me hope gaijin decompress battle rating to 12.3 for ground vehicle top tier because 12.0 not enough

I might want AIM-9M instead Flare/Chaff x640, AIM-9 x4 (stock) & AIM-9L x4, and replace AIM-9L at tier III modification

1 Like

What about AMX-30 Roland? It’s already 9.7 and worse

1 Like

What is the point of increasing the BR range if you increase the BR of everything at top tier at the same time? The level of compression remains identical for all the top BRs.

There are clearly underperforming vehicles in there, the PUMA averages a negative k/d so why is that going up still? Radkampf is your average wheeled MBT without thermals and only 400mm of pen, that’s 10.3 worthy now?

Also handing out reload speed like candy is equally a nerf to top tier tanks that rely on reload speed, the Type 10s are already solely relying on reload speed as they either suck are are artificially nerfed in every other category, if other MBTs keep getting faster and faster reload speeds artificially it should finally get fixed as it’s been bug reported countless times for years.

And preventing people from participating on the forum unless they play your game constantly every single week ridiculous.

image

6 Likes