Ground RB, Roland 1 9.7 > 9.3
After the SACLOS nerfs ages ago, the roland missile system has been practically useless compared to what it used to be. The US and german ones should be 9.7 and the french one 9.3 as it’s worse than those.
(also sidenote the addition of rank 8 ruined grinding france & israel, there are basically no vehicles to use to grind rank 8 compared to before when you could use all the rank 6 ones)
That’s unbalanced considering it gets Fox-1s and Fox-2s. 10.7 is perfectly fine. If it’s good for the buccaneer S.2B it’s good for the F-4C.
Air RB. F14A. 12.3 > 12.7. Give the techtree F14A access to AIM9L, AIM54A is worse than the AIM54C in terms of BVR and WVR it’s useless like the 54C. If the F14B is hopeless against IR missiles, then the 14A is basically dead if anyone gets to your side or rear. At this BR the plane needs something to stand on equal footing. I will not touch the IRIAF F14A because the Fakour 90 is very good and can be used in 4km shots under certain conditions.
Ground Battles, M1A1 AIM : add K-EW A1 or K-EW A2.
As its going to 11.7 with the M1A1 HC and Clickbait it should recieve a shell that is on par with the M829A2 those 2 vehicles are recieving and K-EW A1/2 fit that criteria.
I thought it had apds? Did they not add it?
yes the french one should be lower than those two
it has apds but not a dart, the rcv gets darts im pretty sure.
Vehicle in question: Stormer AD
Vehicle changes: 10.0>9.7
Inferior to the LAV-AD in most aspects bar mobility and radar.
EXCUSE ME NO. IRIAF F-14 NEEDS NERFS. I DONT NEED FOX 3s in my 11.3-11.7 GAMES.
Honestly, I would like to see B model gets AIM-9Ms if it going up to 13.0BR.
That should make them a decent counterpart to the F-15A/F-15J.
Ground Realistic Battle, A10C . 12.0 > 11.7.
Reasoning: Although it’s armed with 6 Mavericks and a great targeting pod (LITENING II), it doesn’t perform that well due to how slow the aircraft is. Unlike F16C that can climb and sling Mavericks from high and far away to give the AGM range, A10C cannot do that so the Maverick aren’t very effective unless you are close to the battle field which is well within AA range. Not to mention the AV-8B (NA) got the same ground attack load out and got better flight model and speed while sitting at 11.3
Feels as if you’re seriously missing the mark with the decompression. If EVERYTHING goes up, nothing has really changed if things don’t fill the voids left behind.
Ground realistic, JA-37C 11.0 → 10.0.
Reason: is comparble to the Mig 21bis and Mig23M/Mf that got a br decrease. JA37C had less countermeasures, worse ordanace and worse missiles (only rear-aspect) this warrents a decrease in br.
M1 Abrams→back to 10.3(GRB) or at least give it M833
I like how all that Gaijin did is blanket move everything 10.0+ without a hit a critical thought whatsoever and think about what even is the point of decompression , the entire list is so poorly thoughtout that with the one vehicle per post rule, I would have to spam the entire thread because so much shit on the list do not deserve to get moved up at all.
Vehicle: USS Pensacola
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 5.3 → 5.7
Reason: it has a braodside of 10x 8" shells which puts it far and above most other 5.7 heavy cruisers and has reasonably good armour for that BR as well. There is little that justifies it being lower BR than something like HMS London.
I think 10.0 at least will be fair for them.
Im face palming rn, RCV (p) is a 20mm Type 87 RCV is 25mm with no laser rangefinder. Stabilizer or thermals at 9.0, the (p) has the same gun as the XM800T buthas slower fire rate, worse ammo per belt, same apds, and is a worse vehicle than XM800T
Conveniently ignoring the fact the F-4C doesn’t have countermeasures there aren’t we?
Vehicle: USS Portland
Gamemode: Naval Realistic
BR Change: 5.3 → 5.7
Reason: it has a braodside of 9x 8" shells which puts it far and above most other 5.7 heavy cruisers and has reasonably good armour for that BR as well. There is little that justifies it being lower BR than something like HMS London.